Lecture 01 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is another term for crowd behaviour?

A

Collective behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can collective behaviour be explained via meta-theories?

Give 3 examples of different meta-theories

A

No

  1. Personality/individual differences
  2. Social cognitions/self interest
  3. Social organisation/sturctures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of explanation for behaviour (societal or intra-individual) is self interest?
What about social organisation?

A

Intra-individual

Societal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who is LeBon? Describe his work

A
  • He researched crowd behaviours and wrote a book on it. His explanations were very popular at the time.
  • He grew up in the French revolution and therefore had a lot of experience of crowd events.
  • He said that crowds reduce civilised behaviour and increase primitive instincts. He also believed that when in a crowd, one becomes homogenous and uniformed. There is a collective mind as conscious personality vanishes and one becomes more impulsive
  • This can be explained via 3 psychological mechanisms.
  • This idea got into the wrong hands as it was so fertile, for example it helped fuel Hitler’s control over a crowd.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are three psychological mechanisms that LeBon said describes crowd behaviour?

A

Contagion; Ideas with a crowd spread fast
Anonymity; No behaviour can be traced back to you as an individual
Suggestibility; People are more open to new ideas or new leaders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe Hogg and Vaughan’s work on the crowd

A

They adapted LeBon’s model of the crowd and supported the idea that when in a crowd one becomes more violent. This idea is still held today in some aspects like riots.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When LeBon’s theory was revised more scientifically, what did the model become?
Describe it

A
  • It became the deindividualisation theory.
  • It contrasts against the idea of the group mind but it still believes that people become more prone to anti-normative, uncontrolled behaviour and their constraints against deviant behaviour decreases.
  • This theory made the idea of the group mind unpopular.
  • Zimbardo then created a deinvdividualisation model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List 2 traditional theories of crowd behaviour

A

LeBon’s theory

Deindividualisation theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe Zimbardo’s deindividualisation model

A

It consists of three stages:
Input variables; the crowd causes anonymity and group size affects behaviour also.
Subjective changes; You have decreased self-observation and decreased concern for social evaluation.
Output behaviour; This results in impulsive behaviour, disinhibition, uncontrolled behaviour etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When in a crowd with no anonymity, is your anti-social behaviour likely to b higher or lower?

A

Lower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe Zimbardo’s 1969 study

A
  • It was a similar set up to Milgram’s experiment.
  • All of the participants were female.
  • People who were deindividulated with a cloak and hood gave shocks that were far longer than those who were in plain clothes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe Diener’s contemporary approach of deindividuation to explain crowd behaviour

A
  • When not in a crowd, we focus on objective self-awareness, whether it is private self awareness or public.
  • However, when in a crowd, this reduces. Attentional cues reduces it as they cause an output of self awareness. This then results in anti-normative behaviour.
  • Public and private self awareness was developed by Prentice-Dunn and Rogers. There is a clear distinction between the two.
  • Some see public self awareness as an extension of objective self awareness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List some problems with the deindividuation theory with evidence

A
  • Postmes and Spears did a review study looking at effect sizes and found that there was little empirical support for the theory.
  • There wasn’t any cause and effect between group size/anonymity and anti-normative behaviour. Therefore it can’t be confirmed that anonymity reduces self awareness.
  • There was contradictory evidence where people who are deindividuated still behave normatively.
  • Johnson and Downing found this. There was no difference between people who were individuated and deindividuated when delivering shock intensity. However, when they were dressed as nurses, they acted normatively (for a nurse) and delivered shocks much less. Especially when deindividuated.
  • Deindividuation doesn’t explain all types of crowd behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What has historical evidence shown about crowd behaviour?

A

It shows that crowd behaviour isn’t chaotic and irrational but it’s actually structured and disciplined. People usually have a purpose to get justice or redress injustice. This made psychologists rethink crowd behaviour and they began to focus on change instead of loss (e.g. identity).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Discuss what the Social Identity Theory (SIT) is

A

Taifel and Turner explored this. It’s a distinction between your personal self and your social self. Your social self identifies in many groups called intergroups, e.g. gender. Normative behaviour, motivations and social comparisons change within a group and this is collective behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Reicher claim about SIT

A

He said that people don’t lose their sense of individuality, they make a transition from their personal self to their social self.

17
Q

Compare deindividuation and SIT

A

Anonymity causes D whereas factors making identity more important causes SIT
The process of D involves losing one’s identity whereas the process of SIT involves a transition
The outcome of D is anti-normative behaviour whereas SIT is normative behaviour (which can still be aggressive).
D doesn’t account for variations in crowd events whereas SIT looks at intergroups.

18
Q

Give an example of intergroup behaviour.

What is intergroup behaviour?

A

Competitive team sports
It’s when perception, cognition and/or behaviour is influenced by other members of a social group. Hogg and Vaughan said it’s regulated by the awareness of and identification with different social groups.

19
Q

What is relative deprivation?

A

It’s a perceived gap between attainments (what is) and expectations (what ought to be). It’s relative and can be seen as a precondition for intergroup aggression.

20
Q

Describe the J curve hypothesis of RD

A

Davies created it and it’s a graph. The graph means that as time goes on the gap between what is and what ought to be increases. This is associated with levels of one’s/ a group’s aggression; the larger the gap the more aggressive they feel. However, this doesn’t have much evidence and it excludes people who are actually happy with what is.

21
Q

What are the two types of RD?

Are they dependent or independent from each other?

A

Egoistic RD; Personally feeling you have less than you’re entitled to relative to other individuals.
Fraternalistic RD; A sense that your group has less than entitled to relative to other groups. This is associated with social unrest.
Independent.

22
Q

What theory did Sherif come up with?

Describe it

A

The realistic conflict theory.
It’s the idea that different groups compete over scarce resources which can cause intergroup conflicts or intergroup harmony. Intergroup behaviour is determined by the interest of your own group compared to another and the nature of the goals. If the goals are mutually exclusive, conflict will arise compared to if goals require interdependence to get the resource. This can cause discrimination.

23
Q

Is realistic conflict always a pre-cursor for discriminatory intergroup behaviour?

A

No it’s not. For example, Tajfel’s minimal group studies.
Reicher and Haslam’s study shows examples of discriminatory intergroup behaviour caused by realistic and no realistic conflicts.