Lec 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What is a crime

A

Crime is any conduct that has a prescribed punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where are crimes defined

A

Criminal code/law of Canada

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Indictable offences

A

Murder, kidnapping, terrorism, drug trafficking, robbery, aggravated sexual assault

Min 2 years
Max life in prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Summary offences

A

Soliciting a prostitute, drunk driving, causing a public disturbance– less harmful offences

Max penalty is 5k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mixed or hybrid offences

A

Assault, sexual assault, assault with a weapon, theft under 5k, fraud under 5k

Can be tried as either kind of offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Actus reus

A

Refers to the guilty action or all non-mental elements of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Actus reus consists of three elements

A

Conduct (voluntary)
Circumstances
Consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does Canada have “duty to rescue” laws

A

No but Quebec is an exception (people have the obligation to protect others from harm if they have no harm caused to themselves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Under what circumstances in the Canada Criminal Code is failure to act a crime

A

-There was a pre-existing duty to act (eg. parents)
-An individual creates a hazardous situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mens rea

A

Refers to the mental elements contained in the definition of a criminal offence
-Guilty mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Subjective mens rea- relating to the individual context

A

The accused should be convicted if

They deliberately intended the consequences
They subjectively realized the consequences might occur
They were willfully blind to the consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Objective mens rea- relating to the general context

A

Someone should be convicted if a reasonable person would have avoided the act

The judge or jury decide whether the accuse acted reasonably

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When is objective mens rea not used

A

Serious crimes such as murder that require proof of subjective mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Strict liability offences

A

Applies to most regulatory offences (eg driving offences)

The accused has to she he was not negligent
Accused assumed to know the regulations
Penalties are lenient
No intentions needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Criminal law

A

Defines meaning of crimes and identifies penalties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does criminal law adress

A

True crimes

17
Q

3 components of criminal law

A

Prohibition
Sanction
Directed against a “public evil”

18
Q

Legislation sources of criminal law in Canada

A

Constitution (Act of 1867)
Statutes-Criminal code of Canada
Regulatory Law

19
Q

Other sources of Criminal law in Canada

A

Common Law (except Quebec which retains French system)
International law from the UN

20
Q

The Criminal code of Canada

A

First passed in 1892

Defines criminal acts and the legal elements that must be present for a conviction

Specifies the criminal procedure to be followed in prosecuting a case and the powers of CJS officials

21
Q

Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility in Canada

A

12 years of age (UN recommend)

22
Q

What form of defense is given to a child below the age of 12

A

Defense of infancy

23
Q

Parties to criminal offences (section 21)

A

A person can be convicted of a crime if

They commit the offence
Assists in the offence
Formed common intention with others to commit an offence
Counsels the commission of an offence
Accessory after the fact (Unintentionally helps someone after the crime)

24
Q

Inchoate crimes

A

The accuser seeks to bring about commission of a particular crime, but he/she isn’t successful in doing so

25
Q

Examples of inchoate crimes

A

Attempt, conspiracy, counselling

26
Q

Defense of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD)

A

Absence of a “guilty mind”-mens rea

It does not mean freedom to the accused

27
Q

Do most individuals in the NCMRD commit violent crimes

A

No, less than 3 percent of all violent crimes come from people with mental illness

28
Q

Where do most NCMRD cases come from

A

BC Ontario Quebec

29
Q

Allan Schoeborn

A

Killed his three children but wasn’t sane at the time of the killings, is now in a psychiatric hospital in BC

30
Q

Defense of mistake of fact

A

The accused made an honest mistake that resulted in a crime

31
Q

Defense of intoxication

A

May be a defense if it prevents the accused from forming intent required for a specific offence.

Expert evidence is needed for successful defense

32
Q

Can defenses get rid of a sentence

A

No, only lessen them

33
Q

Defense of necessity

A

The person commits a less evil of a crime to avoid a greater evil

34
Q

The shipwrecked sailors case

A

Dudley and Stephens were convicted of murder which was later turned into a 6 month prison term

35
Q

Defense of duress

A

The accused was forced to commit a crime as a consequence of threats of death or serious bodily harm made by another person

36
Q

Defense of duress factors

A

Threatened action must be illegal
Causal link between defendants action and the threat
Immediacy is crucial
Defendant must have had no reasonable opportunity to act otherwise

37
Q

Defense of provocation

A

The accused responded to such a wrongful act that an ordinary person would have done the same
Can reduce murder to manslaughter

38
Q

Defense of self-defense factors

A

The nature of the threat and response
The imminency of the threat
Other means available to respond
The person’s role in the incident
Relationship between parties

39
Q

Section 34 of the Canada criminal code states

A

A person may use a reasonable amount of force in self defense if they were to become a victim of assult