Law Flashcards

1
Q

Real property rights

A

Real property is the land, everything that is permanently attached to the land, and all of the rights of ownership, including the right to possess, sell, lease, and enjoy the land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Private nuisance

A

A private nuisance is when one individual unreasonably interferes in the enjoyment of another individual’s use of their land. The most common cases involve nuisance among neighbors. Nuisance can involve anything that annoys, inconveniences, or discomforts the other party. Remedy is Money Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

public nuisance

A

A public nuisance is an unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful interference with a right common to the general public. The sheer number of people affected doesn’t transform a private nuisance into a public one—rather, the public must be affected in a manner specifically prohibited by your city’s or state’s laws.

In general, public nuisances threaten a community’s health, safety, or overall welfare. Common types of public nuisance include pollution, drug activity, explosives storage, and possession of dangerous animals.

Remedy is stop the nuisance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

police power

A

In United States constitutional law, police power is the capacity of the states to regulate behavior and enforce order within their territory for the betterment of the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of their inhabitants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dillon’s Rule vs Home Rule

A

Dillon’s rule allows a substate government to engage in an activity only if it is specifically sanctioned by the state government. Home rule state’s constitution grants municipalities and/or counties the ability to pass laws to govern themselves as they see fit unless noted otherwise by the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tribal Lands

A

An Indian reservation is a legal designation for an area of land managed by a federally recognized Native American tribe under the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs rather than the state governments of the United States in which they are physically located.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bill of Rights

A

The United States Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a physical taking?

A

A physical taking occurs when the government encroaches upon private land for its own proposed use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a regulatory taking?

A

A regulatory taking can arise although the government actions do not encroach upon or occupy the property but still affect and limit its use to such an extent that a taking occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Due Process

A

Due process is the legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. Govt gets the benefit of the doubt. no money damages, nullification of law.
Procedural: Fair procedure process of law
Substantive: Not how the law is being noticed, but what does the content of the law actually say

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do bills become a law?

A

Step 1: The bill is drafted. …
Step 2: The bill is introduced. …
Step 3: The bill goes to committee. …
Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill. …
Step 5: Committee mark up of the bill. …
Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill. …
Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber. …
Step 8: The bill goes to the president.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Telecommunications Act of 1996

A

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the first major overhaul of telecommunications law in almost 62 years. The goal of this new law is to let anyone enter any communications business – to let any communications business compete in any market against any other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Civil Rights Act of 1871

A

Congress followed the Civil Rights Act of 1870 with an 1871 law “to enforce the Provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States,” which came to be known as the Third Enforcement Act or the Second Ku Klux Klan Act. Like the prior year’s legislation, the act was designed in large part to protect African Americans from Klan violence during Reconstruction, giving those deprived of a constitutional right by someone acting under color of law the right to seek relief in a federal district or circuit court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Civil Rights Act of 1968 / Fair Housing Act

A

On April 11, 1968, President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which was meant as a follow-up to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The 1968 Act expanded on previous acts and prohibited discrimination concerning the sale, rental, and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin, sex, (and as amended) handicap and family status. Title VIII of the Act is also known as the Fair Housing Act (of 1968).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Parsons Act (RLUIPA) of 2000

A

protect individuals, houses of worship, and other religious institutions from discrimination in zoning and landmarking laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

1st Amendment

A

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the freedom of speech, religion and the press. It also protects the right to peaceful protest and to petition the government.
Speech - sex & signs, religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

5th Amendment

A

nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” - Takings, Exactions, Due Process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

10th Amendment

A

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Police Power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

14th Amendment

A

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former enslaved people—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.” One of three amendments passed during the Reconstruction era to abolish slavery and establish civil and legal rights for Black Americans, it would become the basis for many landmark Supreme Court decisions over the years.
Equal protection & Discrimination, Due process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Hadacheck v Sebastian

A

-Early zoning district said you can’t have a brick yard in a residential zoned. Pre-existing brick yard declared a “public nuisance”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Munn v Illinois

A
  • Early example allowing states to use police power broadly. Illinois was told they had police power to regulate railroad hauling rates.
22
Q

Pennsylvania Coal v Mahon

A

-Coal sold surface rights to Mahon to build a house but remained sub-surface rights. State made rule prohibiting mining of coal if it could cause subsidence (sinkholes) to residences. Pennsylvania Coal sued state for REGULATORY TAKING due to restrictions that “go to far” they can no longer sell surface rights.

23
Q

Penn Central Transportation Co v City of New York

A
  • NY City Landmarks Preservation Law adopted to protect Grand Central Station. Established TDR SYSTEM to transfer air rights to other areas. SCOTUS determined this did not “go to far” to be considered a taking. “bundle of sticks” mentality looking at the entire property. Also defined “taking” criteria: 1. expected investment 2. nature of govt. action 3. degree of value loss
24
Q

First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v Los Angeles County

A

-SCOTUS decided Temporary Takings still require compensation. church handicapped camp property flooded. State puts moratorium on future development until flood mitigation can be done. Church sues for compensation during this time that they can’t develop. State decided this was not a regulatory taking due to the public necessity and danger outweighed economic loss.

25
Q

Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council

A
  • after hurricane, state denied building permits on 2 lots due to a setback line for safety. Lucas sues for REGULATORY TAKING. SCOTUS determined “per se categorical taking” since the law took all economical use of the property. Settlement reached with state and owner. State bought and sold lots.
26
Q

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

A
  • A temporary moratorium is not a “per se” taking. RPA set moratorium so building permits couldn’t be issued until regulations were set for Lake Tahoe. Owners demanded compensation for time they couldn’t develop. SCOTUS denied.
27
Q

Berman v Parker

A
  • private property may be taken for aesthetic/blight and redevelopment.
28
Q

Kelo v City of New London

A
  • Aesthetics and economic development are sufficient to justify physical takings.
    City condemned an entire neighborhood just for aesthetics without any evidence of slum/blight and paid homes just compensation. SCOTUS allow this. States reevaluated their internal policies to make sure economic development wouldn’t be able to be used in the future.
29
Q

Nolan v California Coastal Commission

A

EXACTION: Essential Nexus - close tie of condition to state interest, To ensure public access to california coast, state conditioned redevelopment permit of private house with public easement. Nolan received compensation for lack of an essential nexus. SCOTUS determined it was up to agency to prove it’s nexus.

30
Q

Dolan v City of Tigard

A

EXACTION: Dual Nexus - Essential Nexus & Rough Proportionality: Dolan wanted permit to expand drug store. City required exaction for a bike path, stormwater and greenway (Essential Nexus for public services). But the proportion of the exaction requirement was greater than the impact to the owner. So this was considered a taking and compensation was required.

31
Q

Koonz v St. John’s River Water Management District

A

EXACTION: property owner wanted to build on wetlands. WMD gave owner solutions to remedy wetlands to make sure it’s developable. Owner declared this was a taking. SCOTUS said Dual Nexus test applies even if no permit is issued & if exaction requires money.

32
Q

Village of Belle Terry v Boraas

A
  • EXCLUSIONARY ZONING- town next to university excluded family homes zoning for students. SCOTUS allowed this.
33
Q

NAACP v Mount Laurel I (1975)

A

Discrimination: Urban renewal leads to white flight. police power deters blacks to stay. NJ Supreme Court determines all municipalities to provide their “fair share” of affordable housing options. But most cities refuse to comply. Robert Moses - Paul Davidoff

34
Q

Mount Laurel II (1983)

A

Discrimination: cities weren’t doing it, and supreme court says “we meant it” and state legislature creates fair share program with state standards.

35
Q

Young v American Mini Theaters

A

-Adult entertainment: ok to use zoning to regulate sex theaters and bookstores

36
Q

Metromedia v City of San Diego

A

-Signs & Billboards: city banned offsite billboards. SCOTUS can prohibit offsite billboards in areas, but can’t require billboards to be taken down.

37
Q

Reed v Town of Gilbert

A

-Free speech, Signs & commercial speech: town regulated size and time of signs, violation of 1st amendment regulate on basis of content!

38
Q

Mugler v Kansas

A
  • Mugler buys a brewery & the state bans alcohol sales and declares it a public nuisance. Not determined a taking due to police power and state’s rights. Does not eliminate all property value so no violation of Due Process.
39
Q

Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co

A

-Established standard zoning regulations we know today.

40
Q

Golden v Town of Ramapo

A

-concurrency: Adequate public facilities available when

the impacts of development occur. first statement of town to plan for its future.

41
Q

Construction Industry Association v City of Petaluma

A
  • Federal Case: Petaluma was seeing a lot of growth and came up with “The Plan” which restricted the number of single family homes that could be build, no of permits in specific locations, and a greenbelt around the town, restricting travel. SCOTUS said they can’t stop the natural growth of a town or inhibit the right to travel, upholding Growth management boundary and phases permit system.
42
Q

Associated Home Builders of the Greater Eastbay v City of Livermore

A
  • State Case: City restricted Residential permits until adequate public facilities were in place, ensuring concurrency
43
Q

Exactions

A

When a permit is conditioned on the permit holder giving something to the permitting agency.

44
Q

Palazzo v Rhode Island

A

Prior knowledge does not restrict a taking.
Palazzo acquired wetlands property knowing restrictions were going to happen in the future. SCOTUS determined if regulation is unreasonable, you can still claim a taking even if you knew about restrictions before you bought it. State decided there was no unreasonable loss of value and therefore no compensation.

45
Q

City of East Lake v Forest City Enterprises

A

DUE PROCESS: City required majority vote referendum for re-zoning. developer claimed violation of due process. SCOTUS said right of referendum to the people and city can do what they want.

46
Q

Village of Arlington Heights v Metro Housing Development Corp.

A

Church wanted to build low income housing in affluent neighborhood & City refused to rezone to allow it. SCOTUS said it doesn’t violate 14th Amendment since no proof of discriminatory intent, but could Fair Housing Act if they can prove discriminatory impact.

47
Q

City of Cleburne v Cleburne Living Center

A

EQUAL PROTECTION FOR DISABLED: city denies permit for group home of retardation, SCOTUS overturned saying no rational basis. Federal statutes can protect what constitution doesn’t.

48
Q

City of Renton v Playtime Theaters

A

Adult Entertainment: upheld 1000 ft buffer between adult and other uses.

49
Q

City of Renton v Playtime Theaters

A

Adult Entertainment: upheld 1000 ft buffer between adult and other uses. Just can’t have a complete ban.

50
Q

Civil Liberties for Urban Believers v City of Chicago

A

RILUPA:

51
Q

Fred Fench v City of New York

A

Planned Unit Development