🫂• Language & Social Groups: Studies Flashcards
List All 4(?) Key Themes That Each Study Relates To
School Girls & Social Cliques
Who were the linguist(s) responsible for this study?
(+ Date of Study)
Emma Moore
2010
School Girls & Social Cliques
What was the focus/ methodology for this study?
- Analysed 39, 12-13/ 14-15 yeard old (as study lasted 2 years) girls from both upper-working or lower-middle class from Bolton, Greater Manchester
- Recorded 50 hours of girls speaking
- Measured frequency of girls’ non-standard lang usage in relation to their identites/ social groups - Language feature: if girls used non-standard ‘were’ or standard ‘was’
- Linguistic Ethnography approach
School Girls & Social Cliques
What were the key findings for this study?
- POPULAR GIRLS: anti-school attitude, took part in rebellious activities e.g. drinking alcohol and smoking - LANGUAGE: mixed usage, 3 girls who used ‘were’ most frequently were from highest class, resistance identity these girls were rebelling, perhaps due to hormones, to converge to ‘cool’ standard/ language use to fit in - covert prestige
- EDEN VALLEY GIRLS: also engaged in school life but unlike geeks had trendy teen style and liked activites e.g. dancing/ shopping - LANGUAGE: used standard ‘was’, may be due to many being higher class and many living further away from school with high class neighbours so wouldnt hear non-standard ‘were’ very often
- GEEKS: actively participated in school activities and valued education - LANGUAGE: used standard ‘was’, due to them caring for school reputation so may have wanted to converge to higher standard to reflect well on school
- TOWNIES: similar to populars but without rebellious behaviour - LANGUAGE: non-standard ‘were’ used frequently, all had at least 1 parent born in Bolton + were friends with working class boys from Bolton where non-standard very common
School Girls & Social Cliques
What core theme(s) does this study relate to?
Jocks & Burnouts
Who were the linguist(s) responsible for this study?
(+ Date of Study)
Eckert
1989
Jocks & Burnouts
What was the focus/ methodology for this study?
WAITING FOR CONDENSED STUDY
Jocks & Burnouts
What were the key findings for this study?
WAITING FOR CONDENSED STUDY
Jocks & Burnouts
What core theme(s) does this study relate to?
WAITING FOR CONDENSED STUDY
Teen Language Study
Who were the linguist(s) responsible for this study?
(+ Date of Study)
Martinez
2011
Teen Language Study
What was the focus/ methodology for this study?
- Comparison between teenage language and adult language
- Completed via informal face-face conversations extracted from Diachronic Corpus of Present-day Spoken English (DCPSE) - ‘data-bank’ of almost 40,000 words collected from 1960s onwards
- Allowing for identifcation of typical lang features of teenagers
Teen Language Study
What were the key findings for this study?
- QUOTATIVES: using ‘like’ as a quotative - telling stories very common in teen speech, therefore wide range of quotative markers, used in multi-modal range, showing solidificaiton of feature
- VOCATIVES: expletives commonly used as vocative, commonly placed after pronoun ‘you’. e.g.= bastard, cunt, dick, dickhead, tosser, idiot, wanker, cow & plonker
- BOYS: higher use than girls, favour: dick, dickhead & chiefer
- –> GIRLS: favour: cow, bitch & whore
- VAUGE LANGUAGE: increased frequency of vauge terms: most common include variations of ‘thing’ e.g. thingamajig or thingymabob - teens express vaugeness very differently to adults
LANGUAGE OF BRITISH TEENS CAN BE CHARACTERISED BY FREQ OF DISSTINCTIVE LEXO-GRAMMATICAL (multiple lang levels) FEATURES WHICH MAKE IT DIFFERENT TO ADULT LANGUAGE
Language can also be asociated with ‘Teen Culture’ and seeking covert prestige amongst teenagers the same age
Teen Language Study
What core theme(s) does this study relate to?
Teeside Study
Who were the linguist(s) responsible for this study?
(+ Date of Study)
Snell
2015
Teeside Study
What was the focus/ methodology for this study?
- Focused on use of non-standard, regional dialect feature of the singular ‘us’ (when ‘us’ is used in replacement of the first-person singular pronoun ‘me’ when reffering only to ones’ self)
- Analysed how children of differing classes in Teeside in North of England speak + semantics/ meanings behind their speech
- For 7 months Snell made weekly visits to 2 schools as classroom helper, one school was lower-working class and the other lower-middle class
- Recorded 50 hours of speech produced by 4 year old children aged 8-9 Yrs as they interacted with eachother - recorded speech of 10 children from each school, monitoring frequency of use of singular ‘us’
- LINGUISTIC ETHNOGRAPY APPROACH in order to achieve in-depth participant observation and immersion into school dynamics - removing possibility of demand characteristics by children skew data