Language and Reasoning Slides Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Communication

A

Most animals are capable of communication, and even across species. But their communication is not considered to be a language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is required for it to be a “Language”

A
  1. GENERAL PURPOSE
    A communication system is considered General Purpose when the language can be used to talk about any arbitrary (random) topic.

Ex. Bees have a very detailed communication system, but its only use is for the direction and distance of flowers. Not General Purpose

  1. SYMBOLICALLY ARBITRARY
    In language, any word can be used for a specific meaning and you will still understand the point that is being made. But other languages have a strict correlation between actions, and meaning for communication.

Animal comm is not symbolically arbitrary because meaning of the message is tied to how the message is conveyed.

Ex. Praire dogs have the same yelp when they see a new predator

Symbol Grounding: However, there may be evidence suggestion that human language isn’t symbolically arbitrary. Because we prefer to use smooth words for round shapes, and edgy words for triangles and squares.

Phenomenon: Sometimes the sound or spelling of a words is symbolic of its meaning.

ex. Slush, flash, fire, slide.

Etymology: The study of the history of words, and their origins.

Ex. Internet slang

Baby Speak:

  • “Mama” (Milk, mother)
  • “Dada” (Dad, dog, diaper, pacifier)
  • “Baba” (father, grandmother, brother, blanket
  • “Susu” (Milk, breast, pee)
  1. GENERATIVE
    Most animal communication is not capable of conveying infinite number of meanings. Therefore its not generative.

A system is generative when a FINITE number of elements can create an INFINITE number of possible outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Phenomenon

A

Sometimes the sound or spelling of a words is symbolic of its meaning.

ex. Slush, flash, fire, slide.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Etymology

A

The study of the history of words, and their origins. Provides insight as to whether or not language is arbitrary or not

Ex. Internet slang

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Symbol Grounding

A

However, there may be evidence suggestion that human language isn’t symbolically arbitrary. Because we prefer to use smooth words for round shapes, and edgy words for triangles and squares.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Elaborate on Generatively

A

Finite elements of language

PHONEMES
In english, 40-50 phonemes are utilized during speech.

Not all languages have the same phonemes, Japanese do not use “L”.

Every language uses a FINITE (Limited) number of phonemes.

Phoneme Acquisition: As we grow up, we are capable of learning and hearing all of the phonemes. But as we get older, we tune them out if our language doesn’t require them.

MORPHEMES
Elements of language that convey basic units of meaning to listeners

Affixes are also morphemes (-ish, -ing, –s, re-, -de, -ive)

Languages have a LIMITED/FINITE number of morphemes, but put them together and you have an INFINITE number of meanings. This is called GENERATIVITY

The outcomes products of language are MEANING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Syntax

A

We seem to combine phonemes and morphemes according to a set of rules called SYNTAX, or GRAMMAR

Suffix/Affix rules:
drink + -ing = Drinking

Phrase Rules:
(Noun) (Verb) (Adjective)
Bob Ran Fast

Syntax allows us to perform generativity. (Finite # of morphemes, unlimited meanings)

Languages have obvious patterns in word usage, and it suggest that we unconsciously follow syntactic rules while producing and comprehending speech

We then assert that if a sentence has syntax, then we understand it. And if not, then we don’t understand.

Not all SYNOPTICALLY VALID STATEMENTS are practically correct (Buffalo example)

Syntactically Malformed Statements: You’ve done well VS You’ve done good
(Same meaning, but the second is irritating)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Age differences in Language Acquisition

A

The younger we are, the easier we pick up new languages. And harder as we get older.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pidgin Languages

A

People with different linguistic backgrounds are forced to interact, and this results with the development of pidgin languages.

They are not true languages because they are not GENERAL PURPOSE

ex. Common within ethically diverse workgroups, slave communities.

This later developed into a Creole language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Creole Languages

A

Children who are raised in communities using Pidgin languages, develop the language into a more robust communication system.

This turns it into a true language, unlike pidgins.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Nicaraguan Sign Language

A

NSL started in 1977 when children attending the centre for special education. Started off as a pidgin language, but then developed into Creole in multiple years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Infant Language Developmental Stages (Language Acquisition)

A
  1. COOING and BABBLING

Cooing (2 Mo) Vowel sounds only, the simples sounds. “ahhh, ohhhh”

Syllables (3-5 Mo) Coordination of constant and vowel sounds - requires moving the vocal tract during speech “Ga, Doh”

Reduplicative (Repetitive) Babbling (6 Mo) Long strings of repeated syllables, motor coordination. “Badadabab, momomo”

Conversational Babbling (10 Mo) Mixing syllables in unpredictable order in conversational tone, turn taking w caretakers. “Bag ado coodita”

  1. WORD PRODUCTION

Infant display word comprehension around 9 months

Speaking around 1 year of age, their language is simplified and error-prone (ba-ba, da-da)

Placeholders and Errors: Over-generalizations are also common in early speech

ex. Using mom to refer to all common females
3. USE OF SYNTAX

Children display the ability to understand syntax at 1.5 yrs

They are able to understand it before they can perform syntactic sentences.

Why this delay? Difficulty in articulating mouths … children need to develop muscle in their mouth area to produce such syntactic utterances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reading

A

As we get older, reading becomes more automatic.

The Stroop Test: Proficient readers have a hard time naming the colour of font of the names of colours. As opposed to poor readers and young children, because they are not as automatic.

Reading involves two main processes

  1. Whole Word Recognition
    - Instead of sounding out each word, our minds match a string of letters to our best guess for a word.
  2. Phonetic Decomposition

Dual Route Model:
-We can process language 2
different ways

  • The phonological route (sounding out words)
  • Or the Direct Route (taking individuals words in as a whole unit)
  • We are only capable of using the direct route for words we are very familiar with.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Theories of Language

Where does language come from?

A

THE BEHAVIOURIST ACCOUNT

Theory: Children acquire it by imitation and operant conditioning

Evidence against:

  • parents tend to reinforce semantics, not syntax.
  • Cannot account for articulation of novel utterances

THE NATIVIST ACCOUNT

Theory: We are born with innate propensities for language and grammar

Evidence against:

  • Language acquisition is gradual
  • Children who do not hear language before the age of 7 do not develop language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

A

The belief that language shapes the way we think about the world

Language is the framework to be able to think and reason

People tend to verbalize thought in their head, instead of images when they’re thinking.

EXPERIMENT

Method: participants were asked to summarize important events in their lives in Russian or English

Manipulation: participants were asked to list off events while they’re in Russia, and events while they’re in USA. Participants were asked to write down their events in Russian or English

Results: measuring detail of responses by how much words they use. When participants are recalling events in Russia in Russian, they write it in more description. Similarly,
participants use more detail for events that happened in USA when written in English.
Memories are encoded by the language of the environment at the time they were encoded. Language provides basis for thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Russian Blues

A

Russia has two different color-words for blue (light blue/dark blue)

Experiment: participants are shown coloured squares and reference squares and had to match which comparison squares best the top reference square [left in notes]

Manipulation: Either being done on native Russian speakers or native English speakers (two options are in Russian … might not matter for English speakers because they don’t know what it means)

Results: Russian speakers take more time doing the experiment because they understand the language. Russian speakers are sensitive if the two options are the same or not. English speakers don’t really have that problem.

Language effecting peoples decisions. Russians have more info to work with so they take longer to do it

17
Q

Restructuring and Insight

A
  • Sometimes we have a way of conceptualizing a problem that makes it difficult to solve it. But sometimes we have a moment where we make a new insight (realization) that rapidly leads us to the solution
  • Finding out the sum of the numbers 1 - 100 (series of 101’s added together) –> 101 x 50
  • Difficulty in problems is finding the right way to conceptualize It
18
Q

Analogical Transfer

A

Previously encountered problems can help us understand how to solve new problems in a different content domain

Analogical transfer: we usually don’t see/notice analogy. Our problem solving is usually tied down to content rather than abstraction and analogy.

Experiment: participants are given a short story and are told to remember it later on. Then they are given/presented to the radiation problem and given 20 minutes to solve

Manipulation: One story has the same functional form as the radiation problem (solution is in the story). The other one has nothing to do with the problem.

How does the story affect people’s exposure to radiation problem? (they are given hints that it has to do with the story)

Results: diving army into small groups from different angles. When people are given problem without back story, only 10% of people get it. If people have read the fortress story beforehand, then only 30% of people recognize the analogy. With the hint its 75%.

People fixate on superficial details

Analogical transfer –> coming to a solution to a problem from previous experience or linking it to a similar problem and applying the solution from one problem to another

People who fail to apply analogical transfer is because they focus too much on the surface characteristics and specific details that are irrelevant to the problem

Experiment: People make analogical transfers easier when it sounds similar to the other problem [e.g. light bulb problem vs. light ray/radiation problem]

People are asked to solve the problem … people are other exposed to radiation problem, and the other group had not been exposed

Results: only 10% come up with light bulb problem solution in the class without being previously exposed to the radiation problem. 80% came up with the problem that were previously exposed

The similarities in content is what draws people to make analogical transfers

19
Q

The Candle Problem

A
  • Problem is challenging because people fixate on the function of things {people think the box is only there to hold tacks} –> called functional fixation: when we are familiar of the function of things we cant make it do anything else

Experiment: box has tacks vs. box without tax

Results: without tacks –> 86% of people come up with a solution

Problem’s difficulties depend on how they’re framed.

Finding the right way to conceptualize a problem is the biggest step to coming up with a solution

20
Q

Functional Fixedness (Experiment)

A

Result: you can treat the strings like a pendulum and then tie them together … people realize how to solve the problem as soon as they see the string being rocked back and forth (done accidentally by the experimenter)

You can use a wrench to form a pendulum, even though that’s not the function of the wrench

People who have difficulty solving this is because they only think of the function of a wrench as being a wrench only and not other things

21
Q

The Water Jug Problem

A

Fill up the larger one once, then 25 liters twice and then pour out 14 liters of small one

Some times people fixate on one solution and they miss alternative and easier ways of doing the same problem

Experiment: show people a series of water jug problems and provid a solution (with trials) and ask them to solve the problems.

All of these problems can be solved in one way…… 2 of the problems can be solved in a simpler form

Manipulation is WHEN the easier solution is shown, either in the beginning or the end

If occurs In the beginning —> people tend to put use the simple solution

If occurs at the end –> people over look the simple solution and they use the complicated version and fixate on what they know and will not come up with more creative solution that is equally as effective.