L17 - Face Perception in the Brain Flashcards

1
Q

Why study faces?

A
  • Can tell us age, gender, emotion, and who they are
  • Where someone looks, and if they are trustworthy, interested in us
  • Most frequent cue we see
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the case study of PS?

A
  • Woman came to London and got hit by a bus on the head
  • Sustained damage to occiptal and temporal lobes of brain
  • Profound inability to recognise faces = prosopagnosia
  • Impairment effecting recognition of identity from faces
  • But knows who people are from other cues
  • Called acquired prosopagnosia, and others are natural/through the lifespan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Bruce and Young do?

A
  • Cognitive model of face processing
  • Two distinct pathways for processing for visual identity and facial expression processing
  • Structural encoding initially where you extract details from faces and when trying to extract facial identity, you have the proportions for each person
  • Identity and expression are diff aspects of processing
  • One pathway is fixed, and the other is not
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Prosopagnosia?

A
  • Acquired through occipitotemporal cortex damage
  • Unable to recognise familiar faces, inc family/self
  • No impairments in identity of familiar
  • Ability to recognise and name other objects is spared
  • Within Bruce & Young model, prosopagnosia deficit located at face recognition unit stage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the neural basis of face perception?

A
  • Dorsal visual stream: concerned with locating objects in space to the ‘where’ pathway: occipital to parietal lobes
  • Ventral visual stream: concerned with identifying objects: ‘what’ pathway: occipital to temporal lobes = where face perception occurs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Fusiform Face Area (FFA)? (With study)

A
  • Area of brain specialised for processing faces
  • Put people in scanners and presented them with faces vs other categories of objects to compare brain activity
  • Specific brain region called Fusiform Face Area in the Fusiform Gyrus - responds more strongly to faces than other objects
  • Even when changing the faces stimuli (mismatched), area responds more preferentially to faces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the face-sensitive areas in the brain?

A
  • Occipital Face Area: specialised for faces and shows physical aspects of stimuli
  • FFA: specialised for faces and invariant aspects of faces e.g identity
  • Superior temporal Sulcus: responds to face and body and has a dynamic stimuli and changable aspects of aspects e.g expression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the Occipital Face Area in more detail

A
  • Located in inferior occipital gyrus
  • Early stage of face perception
  • Sends input to fusiform and superior temporal regions
  • Defined by greater response to faces than non-face categories = not anatomically defined but functionally defined, like the other areas
  • Responds to upright and inverted faces
  • Sensitive to physical changes in stimulus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the Fusiform Face Area in more detail

A
  • Located in the fusiform gyrus
  • Defined by greater response to face vs other non-face categories
  • Responds more to upright faces
  • Sensitive to changes in identity, relatively insensitive to physical changes
  • Acquired prosopagnosia usually due to lesions in or around FFA
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Study looking at OFA vs FFA

A
  • Presented morphs between Mag Thatcher and Marilyn Monroe: people will either see one/other
  • Adaptation was then repeated so neurons became fatigued
  • Had 3 conditions: identical - where both pics are same, within - changing physical features but keeping identity, between - physical features and identity different
  • Greater signal change in OFA when physical properties were changed
  • Greater signal change in FFA when perceived identity change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the Superior Temporal Sulcus in more detail

A
  • Located in superior temporal sulcus
  • Responds to faces, but also to other stimuli like bodies, eye gaze
  • Changeable aspects of faces (viewpoint, gaze direction, expression), but not identity
  • Responds to moving bodies and to changes in gaze direction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the updated model of face perception?

A
  • Distributed neural system for face perception
  • Core system: includes Inferior occipital gyrus, lateral fusiform gyrus, superior temporal sulcus
  • Core system interacts with extended system: includes amygdala etc.
  • Proposed that there are two pathways: facial expression, and identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is the FFA expertise or specificity? (specific to faces or region that responds preferentially to a category that we are expert at) (what are the arguments)

A
  • Domain-general (expertise) vs domain-specific (face specificity)
  • Expertise argues that face-specific mechanisms are highly specialised for distinguishing between exemplars of a category
  • Face-specificity: argues that face perception is a process occurring in dedicated, specialised cognitive and neural mechanisms: faces are specific discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is evidence for the face specificity hypothesis?

A
  • FFA responds more to faces than non-face categories
  • Activation to faces is more consistent and much more robust than face-selective activity in OFA and STS
  • But this neither conclusively provide evidence that FFA activation to faces supports this because faces are so special and theres nothing similar we are so familiarised to
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the evidence for the expertise account?

A
  • Faces require discrimination within a category
  • We become experts at face discrimination through prolonged experience
  • FFA sensitive to expert within category visual discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was an exp on greebles? and on the real world?

A
  • Can train people to recognise these figures and distinguish between them
  • Increased response in FFA to upright faces vs inverted greebles
  • Real word expertise: Found an increased FFA response for cars vs birds in car experts and vice versa for bird experts
17
Q

What was the case study of RM?

A
  • Prosopagnosic: could not identify himself/wife BUT collected miniature cars and was unimpaired in recognising them
  • Cannot be purely down to expertise
  • No known cases where recognition of faces and objects have both been impaired while recognition of non-expert objects is spared
18
Q

What else is the FFA important for?

A
  • Object processing = but not as much as face processing
  • Ventral stream important for object processing
  • Maybe there is relevant info processing in objects for other things in FFA
  • It is not amplitude of response but pattern of response that might contain info for discriminating between objects
  • But Prosopagnosia and visual agnosia speak against this idea as they can do one but not the other
19
Q

What was the third model?

A
  • Same processing stream at one point before it splits into facial expression and identity
  • In order to show expression and identity are separate pathways = need to show double dissociation = where people have impaired recog of identity but not in identity and vice versa
  • Prosopagnosics are impaired with facial identity, they also are slightly impaired in expression recognition and vice versa in other conditions so double dissociation can not be proven
20
Q

Do familiar faces have an emotional signal?

A
  • Emotional response to neutral familiar faces can be measured by skin conductance response - automatic and unconscious = seen in prosopagnosia patients too
  • Familar faces elicit greater SCR than unfamiliar
  • Two face recognition pathways: conscious and unconscious
21
Q

What is Capgras delusion?

A
  • Believe familiar people have been replaced by impostor
  • Able to recognise familiar faces, but no emotional response (increase in SCR)
  • Further evidence for dissociation between emotional response to faces and face recognition
    But patients with ventromedial frontal lobe damage have no SCR to familiar faces, and no Capgras delusion