Kinetics 4: Complex reactions: pre-equilibrium, steady state, MM Flashcards

1
Q

Define an elementary step.

A

An elementary step is a single reactive encounter between species – is the smallest unit of a reaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define (kinetic) mechanism.

A

A proposed set of elementary steps accounting for the features of a reaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define an elementary reaction

A

Consists of a single elementary step

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Elementary reaction: Cl + O2 –> ClO + O, with rate constant k

Write the rate of change for each species.

A

elementary reaction means rate laws can be taken directly from eq since everything is simultaneous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The complex reaction below occurs in 2 elementary steps. Write the rate of change of:

  • product
  • carbocation
A
  • to calculate how [P] changes with time, the diff eqs must be integrated, which is possible here but gets complex as more steps are added, since a given variable appears in multiple eqs.*
  • Hard to solve w/o computer, so the following methods remove some of the complex time-dependence by making assumptions about the relative rates of processes.*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Two sequential, first-order reactions, with rate constants k1 and k2:

A –> B (1) B –> C (2)

Suppose k1 << k2. Draw conc of each species against time on the same axes, and state which step is rate-determining.

A

1 is the RDS

process 1 has smaller rate constant therefore slower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two sequential, first-order reactions, with rate constants k1 and k2:

A –> B (1)

B –> C (2)

Suppose k1 >> k2. Draw conc of each species against time on the same axes, and state which step is rate-determining.

A

2 is the RDS

process 2 has smaller rate constant therefore slower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Study the reaction scheme below. What conditions are required for the pre-equilibrium hypothesis to apply?

A
  • Rate of process 1 >> rate of process 2
  • Such that rates of [1] and [-1] are equal (i.e. equilibrium is established between E, H3O+ and EH+)
  • And therefore process [2] is rate-determining

pre-eq hypothesis is often useful for intermediates involving protonation or deprotonation, since these processes are usually faster than breaking/making bonds to atoms heavier than hydrogen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Study the reaction scheme below. Use the pre-equilibrium hypothesis to derive an expression for the rate equation for formation of products.

A

Rate of process 1 >> rate of process 2, such that rates of [1] and [-1] are equal (in equilibrium), and process [2] is rate-determining:

k1[E][H3O]+ = k-1[EH+][H2O]

So [EH]+ = (k1/k-1)([E][H3O]+/[H2O])

= keq([E][H3O]+/[H2​O])

r = d[P]/dt = k2[EH+][H2O]

= k2keq([E][H3O]+)

  • pre-eq hypothesis makes final rate eq simpler since it involves only reactants, so can be integrated as in previous sections*
  • Could then find experimentally that rate = kexp([E][H3O]+/[H2​O]) – comparing with theoretical rate law would show kexp is a composite of the rate constants of 3 steps*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What conditions permit using the steady state approximation? Include a graph of concentration against time.

A

Applicable when, in a complex mechanism, a reactive intermediate reacts as soon as it’s formed, such that its concentration is assumed to be constant.

Only applicable when reaction is in steady state - not in the initial or final phases.

simplifies solving differential eqs since it removes the time dependence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consider the sequential reaction A –> B –> C with rate constants k1 and k2.

Use the steady state approximation to derive an expression for the rate of product formation.

A

as expected, eq indicates B reacts as soon as it’s formed, such that the first step of the reaction is the RDS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In the reaction scheme below, EH+ is assumed to be in the steady state. Derive an expression for the rate of formation of products.

A

r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k1+k2)) x [E][H3O]+

general process

  • identify the intermediate(s)
  • write the rate law for each, each reaction producing/consuming the intermediate contributes a term to the expression, those consuming it give negative terms
  • set this = 0
  • rearrange for [intermediate]ss
  • write rate law for products, sub in [intermediate], simplify
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In the reaction scheme below, EH+ is assumed to be in the steady state. The rate of formation of products is given by:

r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k1+k2)) x [E][H3O]+

Suppose the rate of [2] >> that of [-1]. Simplify the expression.

A

k2[EH+][H2O] >> k-1[EH+][H2O]

Therefore k2 >> k1

Approximate denominator (k1+k2) = k2

So rate law becomes

r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k2)) x [E][H3O]+

= k1[E][H3O]+

reaction is effectively 2 sequential steps (since -1 is negligable), with the first being slower, so ​rate depends on [1] only since it’s the RDS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In the reaction scheme below, EH+ is assumed to be in the steady state. The rate of formation of products is given by:

r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k-1+k2)) x [E][H3O]+

Suppose the rate of [-1] >> that of [2]. Simplify the expression.

A

k2[EH+][H2O] << k-1[EH+][H2O]

Therefore k2 << k-1

Approximate denominator (k-1+k2) = k-1

So rate law becomes

r = d[P]/dt = ((k1k2)/(k-1)) x [E][H3O]+

= keqk2[E][H3O]+

NB identical to rate law derived assuming [1] and [-1] form a pre-equilibrium. this is since assuming that rate of [-1] >> [2] assumes an equilibrium is set up, and that [2] is a slow RDS, ie bleeding off of EH+

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

try page 36 on notes, decomposition of N205

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is saturation kinetics?

A

Where, for a fixed quantity of enzyme, as [S] increases, the rate of reaction first increases linearly, then levels off to a limiting maximum value.

17
Q

Write out the Michaelis-Menten scheme.

A
18
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten scheme.

  • Give the expression for KM
  • What units does it have?
  • define it
A

kM = (k-1 + kcat)/k1)

Units of conc

KM is the substrate conc which gives ha;f-maximum velocity.

19
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten scheme.

Write the Michaelis-Menten equation, i.e. the expression for the velocity, V (ie rate) of reaction.

A

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + (k-1 + kcat)/k1)

= (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

where KM is the michaelis constant

20
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten scheme.

Using the steady state approximation, derive the Michaelis-Menten equation, ie the expression for the velocity, V (ie rate) of reaction.

A

Assume ES in steady state since intermediate

So d[ES]/dt = k1[E][S] - k-1[ES] -kcat[ES] = 0

Derive an expression for [E], then plug into the above (so that [ES] is the only unknown, given [E]0 is known)

[E]0 = [ES] + [E] –> [E] = [E]0 - [ES]

k1([E]0 - [ES])[S] - k-1[ES] -kcat[ES] = 0

Rearrange for [ES]

[ES]ss = (k1[E]0[S])/(k1[S]+ k-1 + kcat)

Plug [ES] into the expression for velocity (rate)

d[P]/dt = V = kcat[ES]

= (kcatk1[E]0[S])/(k1[S]+ k-1 + kcat)

divide through by k1

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + (k-1 + kcat)/k1)

= (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

where KM is the michaelis constant

21
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten equation.

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

Dependence of V on [S] is complex, so V is measured for the initial rate.

When substrate conc is low:

  • Simplify the equation
  • State the order of reaction in [S] and [E]0
  • State the rate constant and its order
  • Give the biological interpretation
A

[S] << KM so simplify denominator:

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / kM

1st order in [S] and [E]0

2nd order rate constant kcat/KM

There is more free enzyme than substrate-bound enzyme, so rate is limited by substrate availability, hence first order in [S].

22
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten scheme.

Write the expression for Vmax and define it.

A

Vmax = kcat[E]0

Maximum velocity which occurs when all enzyme is saturated, i.e. 0 order in [S].

23
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten equation.

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

Dependence of V on [S] is complex, so V is measured for the initial rate.

When substrate conc is high:

  • Simplify the equation
  • State the order of reaction in [S] and [E]0
  • State the rate constant and its order
  • Give the biological interpretation
  • State the RDS
A

[S] >> KM so simplify denominator:

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / [S] = kcat[E]0 = Vmax

0 order in [S], 1st order in [E]0

1st order rate constant kcat

Velocity is independent of S, due to saturation of V: enzymes all substate-bound so adding S has no effect.

RDS = ES –> E+ P

24
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten equation.

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

Substitute in the expression for Vmax and use this to interpret the meaning of Km.

A

Vmax = kcat[E]0

V = (Vmax[S]) / ([S] + kM)

Substate conc [S]1/2 results in half the max velocity

Vmax/2 = (Vmax[S]1/2) / ([S]1/2 + KM)

So 1/2 = ([S]1/2) / ([S]1/2 + KM)

So ([S]1/2 + KM) = 2[S]1/2

Thus [S]1/2 = KM

So KM is the substrate conc which gives half-maximum velocity.

25
Q

What is the interpretation of large and small KM?

A
  • Large Km: large [S] is needed to achieve half-maximum rate, since enzyme has weak affinity for substrate
  • Small Km: little [S] is needed to achieve half-maximum rate, since enzyme has strong affinity for substrate
26
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten equation.

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

Show how it can give a straight-line plot, and state the intercept and slope (give the version not using, and the one using, Vmax).

A

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

1/V = ([S] + kM) / (kcat[E]0[S])

= KM/(kcat[E]0) x (1/[S]) + 1/(kcat[E]0)

Plot 1/V against 1/[S], giving straight line with slope KM/(kcat[E]0) and intercept 1/(kcat[E]0)

Vmax version

recall Vmax = [S][E]0

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

1/V = ([S] + kM) / (kcatVmax)

= (KM/Vmax)(1/[S]) + 1/Vmax

Plotting 1/V against 1[S] gives a straight line with slope (KM/Vmax) and intercept 1/Vmax

27
Q

Shown is the Michaelis-Menten equation.

V = (kcat[E]0[S]) / ([S] + kM)

Plotting 1/V against 1/[S] gives a straight line with slope KM/(kcat[E]0) and intercept 1/(kcat[E]0), or a straight line with slope (KM/Vmax) and intercept 1/Vmax.

Why are these double-reciprocal plots prone to error?

A

Error in low [S] values are magnified, since in this region 1/[S] is high. So the position of the line, and thus the slope and intercept used to deduce kcat and KM, is overly influenced by these low [S] values.