Energetics & Equilibria 4: Equilibrium Flashcards

1
Q

Write the expressions for the eq constant for the following reaction involving

  • gases
  • dissolved species
  • solids and liquids

A + B ⇔ P + Q

A

solids: trick question, solid species don’t contribute to expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do solids and liquids in reactions not contribute a term to the eq constant expression?

A

Chemical potentials of solids/liquids = standard chemical potentials

I.e. µ = µo, so the term that solid A with coefficient vA = (µ/µo)vA = 1. Therefore the contribution is to multiply the overall expression by 1 – no change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is true of Gibbs energy at equilibrium?

A

∆rG = 0

Effectively, ∆rG is the slope of a graph of Gibbs energy against composition, composition being the ratio of products to reactants. See image

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give the expression linking the standard Gibbs energy of reaction and the equilibrium constant.

A

∆rGo = -RTlnK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Derive that ∆rGo = -RTlnK

A

Assume generic reaction A + B ⇔ P + Q

For a mixture of gases (NB you could do equiv calculation assuming solutions instead):

rG = vpμp(pP) + vQμQ(pQ) - vAμA(pA) - vBμB(pB)

Assume all species are gaseous

μ(pi) = μoi + RT ln(pi/po)

Then sub in chemical potential expressions

rG = vpoP + RT ln(pp/po)) + vQ(…) - vA(…) - vB(…)

Gather together the standard chemical potentials

rG = (vpμoP + vQμoQ - vAμoA - vBμoB) + vpRT ln(pp/po) + vQ(…) - vA(…) - vB(…)

Quantity in bracket = ∆rGo. Put the stoichoimetric coefficients onto the ln terms

So ∆rG = ∆rGo + RT ln(pp/po)vp + …etc

Then gather the ln terms, from here on see image

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CaCO3(s) ⇔ CaO(s) + CO2(g)

Derive an expression for ΔrGo at equilibrium.

A

ΔrG = µ(CO2) + µ(CaO) - µ(CaCO3)

For the solids, µ = µo. For CO2 gas, write in terms of partial pressure, recalling µi(pi) = µoi + RTln(pi/po)

ΔrG = µo(CO2) + µo(CaO) - µo(CaCO3) + RTln(pCO2/po)

ΔrG = [µo(CO2) + µo(CaO) - µo(CaCO3)] + RTln(pCO2/po)

Quantity in [] = ΔrGo

ΔrG = ΔrGo + RTln(pCO2/po)

At equilibrium, ΔrG = 0, so:

ΔrGo = -RTln(pCO2,eq/po)

This demonstrates that, although solids/liquids don’t contribute to the expression for the eq constant K, they do still contribute to ΔrGo, and so they affect the value of K indirectly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • Rearrange the standard Gibbs energy equation to make K the subject
  • Use this to explain how the sign of the standard Gibbs energy predicts the position of equilibrium
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

reaction with +ve change in standard gibbs energy proceeds to some extent. overall, going from reactants to products is associated with a rise in gibbs energy, so this isn’t spontaneous and doesn’t occur. however, it’s not a straight line from reactants to products – it’s a curve which falls then rises. at the minimum of the curve is where gibbs energy is at a minimum. this is the eq composition.

Use this graph to demonstrate the basis of Le Chatelier’s principle, e.g. why the act of removing products (altering concentration) is counteracted.

A
  • removing product increases proportion of reactant in mixture
  • graph moves from eq position to position marked a
  • to return from a to eq is associated with a decrease in gibbs energy, therefore spontaneous
  • so some reactants reform products to counteract the change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • Derive the temperature-dependence of the equilibrium constant
  • Use this to explain why, for an endothermic reaction, increasing temperature shifts eq to products, and vice versa
A

Derivation

Recall ΔrGo = -RTlnK and also ΔrGo = ΔrHo - TΔrSo

So -RTlnK = ΔrHo - TΔrSo

Divide through by -RT

lnK = -(ΔrHo/R)(1/T) + (ΔrSo/R)

Interpretation

Assume ΔrHo and ΔrSo are temperature-independent over a modest temperature range.

  • For an endothermic reaction, ΔrHo > 0, so -(ΔrHo/R)(1/T) is negative, so increasing T makes the term less negative, so lnK and thus K increase. Shifts eq towards products (increased K)
  • For an exothermic reaction, ΔrHo rHo/R)(1/T) is positive, so increasing T makes the term less positive, so lnK and thus K decrease. Shifts eq towards reactants (decreased K)

NB this approach is only applicable for reactions which go to completion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Another method for determining the temperature-dependence of K uses the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation. Write it out

A

d/dT(G/T) = -H/T2 (constant pressure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Another method for determining the temperature-dependence of K uses the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation:

d/dT(G/T) = -H/T2 (constant pressure)

Use this to derive the van’t Hoff equation:

dlnK/dT = ΔrHo/RT2

A

d/dT(G/T) = -H/T2 (constant pressure)

Replace with standard quantities

d/dT(ΔrGo/T) = -ΔrHo/T2 (constant pressure)

Sub in ΔrGo = -RTlnK –> ΔrGo/T = -RlnK

d/dT(-RlnK) = -ΔrHo/T2

Divide through by -R

dlnK/dT = ΔrHo/RT2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Another method for determining the temperature-dependence of K uses the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation to derive the van’t Hoff equation:

dlnK/dT = ΔrHo/RT2

Use this to derive the temperature-dependence (should get the same result as before).

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

For dissolved species, altering pressure doesn’t have a significant effect, but it does for gaseous species.

State how pressure affects the equilibrium constant and composition.

A
  • For a gas phase reaction, Kp and ∆rGo are related via ∆rGo = −RT lnKp, and ∆rGo is defned under standard conditions (pressure = 1 bar), so Kp does not vary with pressure
  • Composition of eq mixture changes in order to keep Kp constant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Consider the following equilibrium:

A2(g) ⇔ 2A(g)

Use the concept of the degree of dissociation to determine the pressure-dependence of the equilibrium composition.

A

Let α = degree of dissociation of dimer A2, i.e. the fraction which have dissociated, where α = 0 means no dissociation and α = 1 means full dissociation.

n0 moles of A2 are allowed to reach eq at pressure ptot, giving degree of dissociation α.

So neq,A2 = (1-α)no, and neq,A = 2αno, and therefore neq,total = (1+α)n0.

Partial pressure of a species i: pi = xiptot

Then write out the partial pressures of each species and derive the eq constant, then rearrange for α (image from here on).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do biological systems drive thermodynamically unfavourable reactions?

A
  • Couple an unfavourable reaction (ΔrGo > 0) to a favourable one (ΔrGo​ > 0) such that overall (ΔrGo​ > 0), so the reaction can occur
  • Coupling occurs physically through connecting reactions closely, eg via an enzyme
  • Examples:
    • ATP hydrolysis is often the favourable reaction used to drive another, e.g. protein synthesis
    • ATP synthesis is therefore unfavourable; it is coupled to glucose oxidation
    • Photosynthetic production of glucose is not favourable, so is coupled to light energy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly