Issues And Debates Flashcards
What is the free will determinism debate
Is our behaviour down to free will or are a set internal/external influences determining our behaviour
How do different approaches differ in precise cause of human behaviour in terms of free will determinism
Biological approach says causes are internal (nature/nurture), behaviourist says causes external. Humanistic believes in free will
What is free will
Humans are self determining and chose their own thoughts and actions, doesn’t deny biological and environmental forces but able to reject these forces as in control of our behaviour
What approach focuses on free will
Humanistic approach
What is hard determinism
All human behaviour has a cause and should be possible to identify and describe these causes, everything we do is dictated by internal or external forces we can’t control
What is soft determinism
Scientists explain what determines our behaviour but we still have freedom to make rational choices in everyday situations
What approach is example of soft determinism
Cognitive approach
What is biological determinism
Biological approach emphasised this, like influence of autonomic nervous system on stress response or influence of genes on mental health
What is environmental determinism
Skinner said free will was illusion and all behaviour result of conditioning. We may think we’re acting independently but choice is a sum of total reinforcement throughout our lives
What is psychic determinism
Freud believed free will is illusion but emphasised influence of biological drives and instincts. Saw behaviour as determined by unconscious conflicts, repressed in childhood, no such thing as accident and something random cause of the unconscious
What is one of the basic principles of science and how does it relate to free will determinism debate
Every event has a cause and causes explained using general laws (hard determinism), knowledge of causes and formulation of laws important in allowing scientists to predict and control future events
In psychology why are lab experiments the ideal of science
Enables researchers to demonstrate causal relationships
What is strength of free will
Free will has practical value, common sense view is we exercise free choice on daily basis and even if it isn’t the case, thinking so can improve mental health. Roberts et al saw teens who believed in hard determinism had greater risk of developing depression and people with external locus of control less optimistic. Suggests even if we don’t have free will, thinking so will have positive impact on mind and behaviour
What is a limitation of free will
Brain scan evidence supports determinism not free will. Libet et al told participants to filial their leg randomly at any moment and measured activity in their brain. Participants had to say when they felt conscious will to move and Libet found unconscious brain activity leading to conscious movement happened half a sec before they moved. Interpreted as meaning even most basic experiences determined by brain before we’re aware of them
What is counterpoint of free will determinism debate
Libets findings show brains involved in decision making is not surprising and is what we expect. Just because action comes before conscious decision to act doesn’t mean no decision to act but decision took time to reach consciousness. Suggests evidence is not appropriate as a challenge to free will
What is a limitation of determinism
Position of legal system on responsibility. Hard determinism is individuals choice isn’t cause of behaviour and inconsistent with way our legal system operates. In court of law, offenders held responsible for actions. Main principle of our legal system is a defendant exercised free will in committing a crime. Suggests in real world determinist argument doesn’t work