Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

Attachment

A

Close two way emotional bond between two individuals in which each individual sees the other as essential for their own emotional security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Animal studies

A

In psychology these are studies carried out on non human animal species rather than human, either for ethical or practical reasons, practical as animals breed faster and researchers interested in seeing results across more than one generation of animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Learning theory

A

A set of theories from the behaviourist approach to psychology that emphasises the role of learning in the acquisition of behaviour. Explanations for learning of behaviour include classical and operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Monotropic

A

Term sometimes used to describe bowlby theory indicating that one particular attachment is different from all the other and central importance to child development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Critical period

A

Time with which attachment must form if it is to form at all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Internal working model

A

Our mental representation of the world, such as representation we have of out relationship to our primary attachment figure which affects are future relationships as it carries are perspective of relationships should be like

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Lorenz research allow others to understand better

A

To understand infant caregiver attachment better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When did Lorenz first observe imprinting

A

When his neighbour gave him a newly hatched duckling and it followed him around

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was Lorenz procedure with the goose

A

Set up a classic experiment where he randomly divided a large clutch of goose eggs, half the eggs were hatched with the mother goose in natural environment and half were hatched in a incubator with Lorenz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was Lorenz findings

A

Incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere but control group followed the mum everywhere, when the groups mixed together, experimental group still followed Lorenz everywhere, called imprinting where bird species that are mobile at birth follow the first moving thing they see and Lorenz identified a critical period when this must happen, depending on species it is only a few hours after hatching and if imprinting doesn’t happen chicks didn’t attach to a mother figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the second thing Lorenz investigated

A

Relation between imprinting and adult mate preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case study did Lorenz describe

A

A peacock that’s as born in a reptile house and it’s first moving object was a giant tortoise and as an adult the same peacock only showed courtship behaviour to giant tortoises, so Lorenz concluded that the peacock had undergone sexual imprinting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why was Harlows research important

A

As he used monkeys which are similar to humans and would show similar attachment results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did harlows research find about the importance of contact comfort

A

New borns in a cage alone often died, but they survived if they had something to cuddle like a cloth or blanket

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was Harlows procedure

A

Tested the idea that soft objects served some of the mothers function, he had 16 monkeys and observed their behaviour with a wired monkey dispensing milk and a cloth covered monkey which wasn’t dispensing milk (they acted as mothers) and tested moneys response when they were scared by adding a noisy mechanical teddy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were Harlows findings

A

Baby monkey cuddled cloth monkey and sought comfort from it when it was scared regardless of which mother dispensed the milk, showing contact comfort is more important to baby monkeys than food in attachment behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How long did Harlow follow the monkeys for

A

To adulthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Harlow find about the long lasting effect of maternal deprivation

A

Monkey with plan wire was most dysfunctional but even ones with the cloth mother didn’t develop normal social behaviour, the monkeys were more aggressive, less social and bread less as they were unskilled at mating and when they were mothers they neglected and attacked and in some cases killed their children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Harlow conclude that the critical period for attachment to form normal development was

A

90days and after this attachment was impossible and damage of early deprivation was irreversible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a strength of Lorenz research

A

Existence if support of imprinting as Regolin and Vallotigara exposed chicks to simple shape combinations that moved (triangle w rectangle) then a range of different shape combo were added but they followed the first one most closely which supports Lorenz view that animals have innate mechanism to imprint on moving object in critical period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a limitation of Lorenz research

A

Birds are very different to humans and mammal attachment is more complex than birds for example it is a two way process, and Lorenz ideas can’t be generalised to humans but some kind of imprinting explains some human behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is a strength of Harlow research

A

Important to real world application as it can help social workers understand that lack of bonding may be a risk factor in child development and it can help prevent poor outcomes according to Howe, also it helps understand importance of attachment in monkeys at zoos and in wild breeding programmes, so Harlows research is theoretical and practical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is a limitation of Harlow research

A

It cannot necessarily be generalised to humans, monkeys more similar to humans than birds but human brain is still more complex and it isn’t appropriate to generalise Harlows findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Ethical issue with Harlows research

A

Baby monkey had long term and severe distress but Harlow research was practical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Who said caregiver infant interaction can be explained by learning theory

A

Dollard and Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What approach emphasises the importance that caregiver provides food

A

Cupboard love.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is cupboard love

A

Children learn to love whoever feeds them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is classical conditioning and an example

A

Learning to associate 2 stimuli together so we respond to both in the same way we respond to one, e.g. food is an unconditional stimulus as it gives us pleasure but we don’t learn it and so we give an unconditional response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What stimulus does a caregiver start as and then what happens in classical conditioning

A

Caregiver starts as a neutral stimulus as gets no response from the baby but over time the caregiver feeds the baby and then the baby associates the caregiver with food, so neutral stimulus becomes a conditional stimulus as sight of the caregiver provides a conditional response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is the conditional response the baby would give to the sight of their caregiver

A

Love and so attachment forms to their caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Which psychologist believed in classical conditioning

A

Pavlov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is operant conditioning

A

Learning from consequences of behaviour, if behaviour gives pleasant response it will be repeated again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

In operant conditioning what is behaviour said to be

A

Reinforced so if behaviour gives an unpleasant response/ punishment it won’t be repeated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What is an example of a behaviour which provides a pleasant response in operant conditioning

A

When baby cries for comfort, important behaviour in building attachment and crying gives a response from caregiver such as feeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What happens in operant conditioning if the caregiver provides the right response

A

Behaviour is reinforced and baby will in future cry to seek comfort and the caregiver will respond with comforting ‘social suppressing’ behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Why is reinforcement a two way process

A

When a babies cry is reinforced, caregiver gets negative reinforcement as crying stops because the caregiver escapes from something unpleasant so it is reinforced and this mural reinforcement strengthens attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

As well as conditioning what else does learning theory draw the concept of

A

Drive reduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What kind of drive is hunger and why

A

A primary drive as it is innate and a biological motivator as we are motivated to eat in order to reduce the hunger drive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What did Sears et al suggest in learning theory

A

As caregiver provides food, primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to them so attachment is a secondary drive learned by association between caregiver and satisfaction of a primary drive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Who believed in operant conditioning

A

Skinner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What is a limitation of learning theory explanations for attachment

A

The lack of support from other animal studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Which animal studies contradict the idea of learning theory and why

A

Lorenz geese imprinted on first moving object regardless of its association with food and Harlows monkeys preferred cloth mother than the mother providing food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What does the limitation of learning theory due to lack of support from other animal studies show

A

Shows factors other than association with food are important in attachment formation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is another limitation of learning theory explanations

A

The lack of support from studies of human babies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Which psychologist conducted studies in human babies which contradict learning theory

A

Schaffer and Emerson found babies tend to form attachment to their mother regardless of who feeds them and Isabella et al found high levels of interactional synchrony predicted the quality of attachment not food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What does the lack of support from other studies on human babies show about learning theory

A

Suggests that food is not the main factor in attachment formation in humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What is a strength of learning theory

A

Elements of conditioning could be involved in some aspects of attachment, although unlikely that association to food plays the central role in attachment, it may still have a role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What is an example of a babies behaviour which isn’t to do with food

A

Baby may associate feeling warm and comfortable with the presence of a particular adult and it may influence babies choice of primary caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What may learning theory still be useful in

A

Understanding development of attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

What is the counterpoint of the strength that learning theory could be involved in some aspects of attachment and who said that

A

Both classical and operant conditioning explanations see baby playing passive roles in attachment development, simply responding to associations with comfort and reward but Feldman and Eildelman showed babies take an active role in interactions to produce attachment so conditioning may not be an adequate explanation of any aspect of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What did Hay and Vespo suggest about learning theory

A

Parents teach their children to love them by demonstrating attachment behaviours like hugging, parents also reinforce loving behaviour by showing approval to their babies show attachment behaviour such as cuddles to their parents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Why does social learning perspective have more advantages than learning theory

A

It is based around two way interactions so it fits better with research into reciprocity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

What theory did Bowlby reject and what did he look at instead

A

Rejected learning theory and looked at Lorenz and Harlow work for an evolutionary explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

What did Bowlby believe

A

Attachment was an innate system that gives survival advantages, so attachment evolved as a mechanism to keep young animals safe to ensure they stay close to their adult caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

What does Bowlby theory mainly described as

A

Monotropy as he emphasised child’s attachment to one particular caregiver and he believed child’s attachment to one particular caregiver is different and more important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

What did Bowlby say about monotropy

A

He said the more time a child spends with their primary caregiver the better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

What two principles did Bowlby use to clarify monotropy

A

Law of continuity-more constant and predictable child care, the better quality their attachment is & law of accumulated separation-effects of every separation from primary caregiver add up (safest dose it 0)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

What did Bowlby say babies were born with and why

A

A set of cute innate behaviour like smiling and gripping to attract mothers attention know as social releases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

What is the purpose of social releasers and what did this tell Bowlby about attachment

A

To activate adult social interaction to make adult attached to the baby and Bowlby reconsider attachment was reciprocal as both mum and baby are hard wired to form attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

What gradually builds a relation between caregiver and infant and when does this begin

A

Interplay between adult and child attachment systems gradually builds a relation between them and can begin in early weeks of life, known as critical period around 6months when baby’s attachment system is active

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

What did Bowlby call the critical period and why

A

Sensitive period between 6month and 2years and if attachment isn’t formed in this period the baby will find it hard to make one in later life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

What was the final thing Bowlby proposed about attachment

A

Child forms mental representation of their relationship with their primary attachment figure called internal working model as it sets model for what relations should be like

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

What will a child believe if their first relation was reliable and loving

A

They will expect future relationships to be like that and they will also bring these qualities to a relation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

What will children treated poorly in their first relation expect of later ones

A

They will treat people poorly and expect the same in return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

What does internal working model also process the effect of

A

Effects child’s ability to parent themselves as people base their parenting on their own experience which explains why children from functioning families tend to have similar families themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

What is a limitation of Bowlby theory

A

Concept of monotropy lacks validity, Schaffer and Emerson found although most babies form one attachment first, some form multiple at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

Why is monotropy not valid

A

First attachment has a strong influence in later behaviour, but other attachments to family members provide all the same key qualities like support and safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

What does lack of validity of monotropy mean for Bowlby theory

A

He may be incorrect that there is a unique quality and importance to child’s primary attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

What is a strength of Bowlby research

A

Supporting evidence of the role of social releasers as their is strong evidence showing babies cute behaviours are designed to elicit caregiver interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

What study showed supporting evidence for social releasers and what does this indicate

A

Brazelton et al observed babies trigger interaction with adults using social releasers, babies who were shown to be normally responsive became more distressed and some curled up motionless when the caregiver didn’t respond to their releases, illustrating role of social releasers in emotional development and suggest they are important in attachment development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

What is another strength of Bowlby theory

A

Support for internal working model as Bailey et al assessed attachment relations in 99mums and their babies, researchers measured mothers attachment to their primary attachment figure and found mothers with poor attachment to their parent, were more likely to have poor attachment to their baby

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

How does Bailey et al research support that of Bowlby

A

Supports idea that mothers ability to form attachments to their baby is due to internal working model and that it comes from their own early attachment experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

What is a counter point to internal working model

A

Some psychologist believe genetic differences in anxiety and sociability effect social behaviour in babies and adults which could impact their parenting - Korienko. Means that Bowlby may have overstated importance if internal working model in social behaviour and parenting at the expense of other factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

What was the stranger situation

A

Developed by Mary Ainsworth with aim to observe key attachment behaviours as a means of assessing the quality of a baby’s attachment to their caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

What observation is stranger situation

A

A controlled observation procedure designed to measure the security of attachment a baby shows towards their caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

Where did stranger situation take place

A

In a room with controlled conditions (lab) with a 2way mirror and cameras through which psychologist can observe the babies behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

What were the 5 behaviours being observed in stranger situation

A

Proximity seeking. Exploration and secure base behaviour. Stranger anxiety. Separation anxiety. Response to reunion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

What is proximity seeking

A

Baby with good quality attachment will stay fairly close to their caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

Exploration and secure base behaviour

A

Good attachment enables baby to feel confident to explore using caregiver as a secure base

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

What is Stranger anxiety

A

A sign of close attachment is anxiety when a stranger approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

What is separation anxiety

A

Sign of close attachment is to protest when separated from attachment figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

What is response to reunion

A

Babies who are securely attached greet caregivers return with pleasure and seek comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

What is the first 3min stage of stranger situation

A

Beginning; caregiver and baby enter an unfamiliar play room

84
Q

What is stage one of the stranger situation

A

Baby encouraged to explore, looking at exploration and secure base

85
Q

What is stage 2 of stranger situation

A

Stranger enters and talks to the mother and then approaches the baby, exploring stranger anxiety

86
Q

What is stage 3 of stranger situation

A

Caregiver leaves baby and stranger, looking at separation and stranger anxiety

87
Q

What is stage 4 of stranger situation

A

Caregiver returns and stranger leaves, looking at reunion behaviour and exploration and secure base

88
Q

What is stage 5 of stranger situation

A

Caregiver leaves baby alone, looking at separation anxiety

89
Q

What is stage 6 of stranger situation

A

Stranger returns, exploring stranger anxiety

90
Q

What is stage 7 of stranger anxiety

A

Caregiver returns and is reunited with the baby, reunion behaviour is being observed

91
Q

What were Aimsworths stranger situation findings

A

Distinct patterns found in ways babies behave and they identified 3 main types of attachment

92
Q

What were the 3 attachment types Ainsworth et al found

A

Secure attachment(type B), insecure-resistant(type C), insecure-avoidant(type A)

93
Q

What is secure attachment

A

These babies explore happily but often return to caregiver, they tend to show moderate stranger anxiety, securely attached babies require and accept comfort from caregiver in reunion, they have moderate stranger anxiety and 60-70% of Uk babies are classed as secure

94
Q

What is insecure avoidant attachment

A

Babies explore freely and don’t seek secure base, they show little relation when caregiver leaves and stranger enters, makes little effort to contact caregiver when they return and may avoid contact, 20-25% of Uk babies classed as insecure-avoidant

95
Q

What is insecure resistant attachment

A

Babies seek more proximity and explore less, high levels of stranger and separation anxiety but resist comfort when reunited with caregiver, 3% of British babies classed as insecure resistant

96
Q

What is a strength of stranger situation

A

It predicts many aspects in babies later development, lots of research shows type B babies to have better outcomes than the others in later childhood and adulthood, suggest stranger situation measures something meaningful about a child’s development

97
Q

What were some studies and outcome which were based on the 3 attachment types

A

McCormick et al says type B less likely to be involved in bullying and likely to achieve better in school, Ward et al said Type B have better mental health in adulthood and insecure resistant babies tend to have worse outcomes and ones who aren’t either A B OR C

98
Q

What is a counter point to stranger situation predicting aspects of child’s development

A

Stranger situation clearly measures something associated with later development but some psychologist don’t believe this is attachment, Kagan suggest genetically influenced anxiety levels account for attachment variations in strange situations and later development which may mean stranger situation may not actually measure attachment

99
Q

What is another strength of strange situation.

A

Good inter rater reliability as Bick et al tested inter-rater reliability and found agreement on attachment types 94% of the time, means we can be confident of the attachment types of strange situation as they don’t depend on subjective judgment

100
Q

Why may there be high inter rater reliability of strange situation

A

As study was under controlled conditions and as behaviours like stranger and separation anxiety involved large movements they were easier to observe as anxious babies will cry and crawl away from stranger

101
Q

What is a limitation of stranger situation

A

May not be valid measurement of attachment in different cultural contexts as it was developed in UK and USA so may only be valid for Western European cultures and US

102
Q

Why may there be a cultural bound with the strange situation

A

Babies have different experiences in different experiences in different cultures and may affect their response to strange situation

103
Q

What was Takashi study

A

Japanese study, babies displayed very high levels of separation anxiety and disproportionate number were insecure avoidant and takashi suggested this was due to mother baby separation being very rare in Japan

104
Q

What did Takashi study show about strange situation

A

It is difficult to know what strange situation is measuring outside of Western Europe and USA

105
Q

What did Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg conduct a study on

A

Looked at secure, insecure-avoidant and insecure resistant attachments across a range of countries to assess cultural variation, also looked at differences within the same country to get an idea of variation in a culture

106
Q

What was Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg procedure

A

They found 32studies where strange situation had been used to investigate the proportion of babies with different attachment types, they were conducted in 8countries (15 in US) and overall used 1990children, data from the 32 studies was meta analysed

107
Q

What is meta analysis

A

Results of the study are analysed and combined together, weighting each study for its sample size

108
Q

What were Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg findings

A

There was wide variation between proportions of attachment types in different studies, in all countries secure attachment was most common but proportions varied as 75% in Britain but only 50% in China, in individualist cultures insecure-resistant were similar to Ainsworth as they were all under 14%, but in collectivists cultures from China, Japan, Israel it was above 25% and avoidant was lower, also variations in one countries were 150% greater than between different countries

109
Q

What was the findings of two US studies which showed huge cultural difference

A

Study found only 46% securely attached compared to another which found 90% securely attached

110
Q

What Italian study did Simonelli et al conduct

A

Italian study to see whether attachment matches other studies, he added 76babies age 12months using strange situation

111
Q

What were Simonelli findings

A

50% secure and 36% insecure avoidant, lower secure and higher insecure avoidant found in many studies and researchers suggest this is because increasing number of mothers working longer hours and using child care when baby is very young

112
Q

What do Simonelli findings suggest

A

Patterns of attachment types aren’t static but vary in line with cultural changes

113
Q

What Korean study did Jin et al carry out

A

Conducted study comparing Korean baby attachment to other studies

114
Q

Jin et al findings

A

Majority of babies being secure but more insecure we’re resistant and only one was avoidant and similar to Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg study, probably as Japan and Korea have similar child rearing styles so explains similar results

115
Q

What conclusion can be made from the 3 cultural variation of attachment type studies

A

Secure attachment is the norm in a wide range of cultures, supporting Bowlby idea that attachment is innate and universal and this is the norm type, but research clearly shows cultural practices have an influence on attachment type.

116
Q

What is a strength of the cultural variation studies

A

They were conducted by indigenous psychologists, had the same cultural background as the participants (Kroonenburg German and Takashi Japanese) which means potential cross cultural communication issues are avoided and there are no bias of cultural stereotypes

117
Q

What is the counter point to all cultural variation studies were carried out by indigenous psychologists

A

No all were, for example Morelli and Tronick were outsiders in a study conducted in the USA so data from some studies may be affected by bias and communication difficulties

118
Q

What is a limitation to Kroonenburg and Ijzendoorn study

A

Meta analysis may not have been accurate due to confounding variables within the study such as room size, age, urban/rural, poverty and social class may all effect the results, also if less toys in the room babies are less likely to explore so less visible proximity seeking, therefore looking at attachment behaviours from different studies may not tell us about cross cultural patterns as may have different variables effecting their results

119
Q

What is another limitation of the cross cultural variation studies

A

Trying to impose a test designed for one culture to another know as imposed etic, cross cultural psychology includes idea of emic (cultural uniqueness) and etic (cross cultural university)

120
Q

What is an example of imposed etic

A

Babies response to caregiver reunion, in UK and USA lack of response may indicate avoidance and insecurity but in Germany it indicates independence

121
Q

What does imposed etic mean about strange situation variations between cultures

A

Strange situation behaviours may not mean the same thing in different cultural contexts and comparing them across cultures is meaningless

122
Q

What has been said about cross cultural research showing similar attachment types in different countries

A

Bowlby theory explain this by saying attachment is innate and universal but Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg said it is due to global media representation of how parents and babies are meant to behave which overrides cultural differences in how children are brought up

123
Q

What other theory did Bowlby propose and what did it involve

A

Theory of maternal deprivation, idea was that continuous presence of a caregiver/substitute is essential for normal psychological development of babies, both emotionally and intellectually being separated from mother in early childhood has serious consequences

124
Q

What does separation mean

A

Separation means child not being in presence of primary caregiver

125
Q

When does separation become problematic

A

When child becomes deprived of emotional care, can happen if mother isn’t present or is depressed

126
Q

Is brief separation an issue

A

With a substitute caregiver who provides emotional care is sufficient for normal development but extended separation can lead to deprivation which is harmful

127
Q

What did Bowlby say the impact on intellectual development was if maternally deprived and Golfarb

A

Maternal deprivation during critical period means the children would have lower IQs, Goldfarb found lower IQ in institutional care than those in foster homes as there is less emotional care which backs Bowlby theory

128
Q

What did Bowlby say the effect of emotional development may be if child is maternally deprived

A

Bowlby identified affection less psychopathy (no emotion or guilt to others) which prevents relationships and associates to criminality

129
Q

What did Bowlby do in 1944

A

Studied 44 thieves and examined the link of maternal deprivation and affectionless psychopathy

130
Q

What was Bowlby maternal deprivation procedure

A

Used 44 criminal teenagers accused of stealing and they were interviewed and examined for signs of affectionless psychopathy, characterised by lack of affection and remorse for their crime, their families were also interviewed to see if they were maternally deprived, this was then compared to a control group of 44 non thieves but who were emotionally disturbed

131
Q

What were Bowlby maternal deprivation findings

A

14/44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths and 12 of them experienced maternal deprivation but only 5 of remaining thieves experienced maternal deprivation, only 2/44 in control group experienced prolonged separation, so Bowlby concluded prolonged early separation/deprivation causes affectionless psychopathy

132
Q

What is a limitation of Bowlby theory of maternal deprivation

A

It is based on poor quality evidence as Bowlby carried out both child’s and family interview so he may have been bias as he knew in advance who to expect psychopathy in, also Bowlby was influenced by Goldfarb study on wartime orphans which led to issues of confounding variables such as early trauma and institutional care as well as prolonged separation from primary caregiver which means Bowlby original source of evidence is flawed and wouldn’t be taken seriously nowadays

133
Q

What is the counterpoint to Bowlby maternal deprivation having poor quality of evidence

A

New lines of research show long term effects of maternal deprivation, Lévy separated baby rats from their mother and had permenant effect on their social development but not other aspects of their development which means Bowlby originally based study in flawed evidence but since there has been supporting evidence

134
Q

What is another limitation of Bowlby maternal deprivation study

A

The confusion between different types of early experience, Ritter drew important distinction between two early types of negative experience

135
Q

What were the two types of early negative experience Ritter talked about

A

Deprivation which is loss of attachment after one has developed and privation which is failure to form an attachment in the first place

136
Q

What did Rutter say about Bowlby maternal deprivation study

A

Long term damage is more likely due to privation instead of deprivation, so Goldfarb study may also have observed privation not deprivation

137
Q

What did Rutter theory say about Bowlby maternal deprivation research

A

He may have over estimated seriousness of effects of deprivation in children’s development

138
Q

What is the final limitation of Bowlby maternal deprivation study

A

The idea of a critical period as for Bowlby damage was inevitable if child didn’t form an attachment in the first 2.5years but there is evidence suggesting good aftercare can prevent any damage

139
Q

What study contradicts Bowlby idea of critical period

A

Koluchova reported a case of Czech twins who experienced severe physical and emotional abuse form 18months to 7years, they were severely emotionally damaged but they received excellent aftercare and by teens were fully recovers

140
Q

What does the case about the Czech twins mean for Bowlby maternal deprivation study

A

Lasting damage is not inevitable even in cases of severe privation which is why the critical period is better seen as a sensitive period

141
Q

Why did research into maternal deprivation use orphans

A

To study emotional and intellectual effects of deprivation, it was a tragic opportunity to see the consequences of institutionalisation in 1990 Romania

142
Q

Why were there so many Romanian orphans

A

Former president required women to have 5children and many couldn’t afford this so they ended up in an orphanage

143
Q

What were the quality of Romanian orphanages

A

Large and poor quality

144
Q

What happened after 1989 in Romanian

A

Revolution happens and many orphans adopted, some by British people

145
Q

What was Ritter et al procedure in his Romanian orphan study

A

Ritter et al followed 165 Romanian orphans for many years as part of an English Romanian adoptee study, orphans were adopted by English parents and aim was to investigate the extent of which good aftercare can make up for poor early experiences in institutions

146
Q

What did Ritter measure and at what ages

A

Physical, cognitive and emotional development measured at the age of 4, 6, 11, 15 and 22-25

147
Q

What did Ritter use as his control group in Romanian orphan study

A

52 adopted kids from the UK at the same time were the control group

148
Q

What were Rutter et al findings

A

When kids first arrived they showed signs of delayed intellectual development and under nourishment, age 11 they showed different rates of recovery depending on when they were adopted, IQ of children adopted before 6months was 102, 6month-2years was 86 and 2years+ was 77, differences remained at age 16 and ADHD common in orphans age 22-25

149
Q

What did children adopted after 6months show in Rutter study and what did those adopted before 6month show

A

Adopted after 6months showed particular attachment known as disinhibited attachment, symptoms were attention seeking, clinginess, social behaviour was indiscriminately directed towards all adults, not just caregiver, but those adopted before 6month rarely displayed disinhibited attachment

150
Q

What was Zeanan et al procedure into Romanian orphans

A

Zeanan et al conducted a Bucharest early intervention project, assessing attachment in 95 Romanian children aged 12-31 months who spent most of their time in institutional care and compared them to a control group of 50 who never lived in an institution, attachment type measured using strange situation and careers were asked about unusual social behaviour which relates to disinhibited attachment

151
Q

What were Zeanan et al findings in Romanian orphan study

A

74% of control group were securely attached compared to only 19% of institutionalised kids, disinhibited attachment applied to 44% of orphans but less than 20% of the control group

152
Q

What is disinhibited attachment and what causes it

A

Typical effect of spending time in institution, children are squally friendly and affectionate to familiar people and strangers which is unusual as most babies at this age show stranger anxiety

153
Q

How did Ritter explain disinhibited attachment

A

The orphans had multiple caregivers during their sensitive period of attachment formation and in poor quality institutions in Romania children may have had up to 50 carers but didn’t spend enough time with only one of them to form an attachment

154
Q

What did Rutter say most infants showed signs of when arriving in the UK but then what happened

A

Signs of intellectual disability, but most adopted before 6month caught up with control group by age 4 which means similar to emotional development, damage to intellectual development as a result of institutionalisation can be recovers if adoption happens before 6month (critical period)

155
Q

What was a strength of a Romanian orphan studies

A

Their application to improve conditions for children growing up outside family homes

156
Q

What did studying Romanian orphans mean for real world application

A

It improved psychologists understanding of the effects of early institutional care and how to prevent the worst of these effects according to Langton which led to improvements of conditions experienced by looked after children

157
Q

What did Romanian orphan studies mean for orphans to come

A

Children growing up in orphanages now have less numbers of caregivers for each child but instead they have 1/2 main caregivers who play a central role in their emotional care and also institutional care is seen as an undesirable option so a considerable effort is made to accommodate such children in foster care to get them adopted

158
Q

What did Ritter research mean for orphans in institutions

A

Children in institutions now have a better chance to develop normal attachments and disinhibited attachment is avoided

159
Q

What is another strength of the Romanian orphan studies

A

Lack of confounding variables, children from Romanian orphan studies had been handed over by loving parents who couldn’t afford them which means they were less likely to be confounded by other early negative experiences so they have high internal validity

160
Q

What is an example of orphans which were studied but confounding variables were involved

A

WW2 orphans as they had experienced early trauma and it is difficult to reverse the effect of neglect

161
Q

What is another strength of the Romanian orphan studies

A

Lack of confounding variables, children from Romanian orphan studies had been handed over by loving parents who couldn’t afford them which means they were less likely to be confounded by other early negative experiences so they have high internal validity

162
Q

What is an example of orphans which were studied but confounding variables were involved

A

WW2 orphans as they had experienced early trauma and it is difficult to reverse the effect of neglect

163
Q

What is the counterpoint to lack of confounding variables in Romanian orphan studies

A

Studying children from Romanian orphanages may have introduced different confounding variables as the quality of care in these institutions were poor and children received little intellectual stimulation or comfort which means harmful effects seen in studies of Romanian orphans may represent the effects of poor institutional care rather than institutional care on the whole

164
Q

What is a limitation of the Romanian orphan studies

A

There is a current lack of data on adult development, latest data from ERA study looked at the children in their early to mid 20’s which means there is no current data to answer some of the most interesting research questions about the long term effects of early institutional caregiver

165
Q

What research questions are yet to be answered about Romanian studies due to lack of data on adult development

A

Lifetime prevalence of mental health problems and participants success in forming and maintaining adult romantic and parental relationships

166
Q

Why is it hard to to gather adult development data from orphan studies and what does this mean

A

It will take a long time to gather this data due to the longitudinal design of the study like the same participants being followed for a long period of time which means it will be some time before we know more completely what the long term effects are for the Romanian orphans and it is possible that late adopted children may catch up but tests have not be carried out for us to know

167
Q

Orphan studies

A

Concern children placed in care as their parents can’t look after them, an orphan is a child whose parents have either died or have permanently abandoned them

168
Q

Institutionalisation

A

A term for the effects of living in an institutional setting. Institution refers to a place like a hospital or orphanage where people live for long, continuous periods of time. In such places there is little emotional care and in attachment research we are interested in the effects of institutional care on children’s attachment and subsequent development

169
Q

What did Bowlby suggest about babies attachment to their primary caregiver

A

It leads to a mental representation of their relationships, internal working model acts as a template for the future childhood and adult relationships

170
Q

Why is quality of babies first attachment crucial

A

The template will effect the nature of their future relationships

171
Q

What will happen is a child’s first attachment is loving and reliable

A

They assume this is how relationships are meant to be so they will seek functional relationships and behave functionally with them

172
Q

What are qualities in a relationship where the baby had a loveable upbringing

A

They are involved, uninvolved suggests insecure-avoidant or if they are controlling and argumentative they are insecure-resistant

173
Q

What is likely to happen to a child with bad experiences first experiences in their future relationships

A

They will bring there first experience qualities to later relationships, they may struggle to form relationships (avoidant) and may behave inappropriately within a relation (resistant)

174
Q

What is attachment type associated with

A

Quality of peer relationships in childhood

175
Q

What did Kerns say about secure and insecure babies

A

Secure babies go on to form the best quality childhood friendships but insecure babies will find difficulty in making friendships

176
Q

What can predict bullying

A

Attachment type

177
Q

What did Myron-Wilson and smith assess and how

A

If bullying and attachment type correlate, Used a questionnaire with 196children age 7-11 in London

178
Q

What were Myron-Wilson and smiths results

A

Secure were very unlikely to be involved in bullying, avoidant were likely to be victims and resistant were likely to be bullies

179
Q

What two major adult experiences are affected by internal working model

A

Romantic relationships and parental relationships with their own child

180
Q

What did McCarthy study

A

Studied 40adults women who were assessed as babies to establish their early attachment type

181
Q

What were McCarthy findings

A

Secure babies had best adult friendships and romantic relationships, insecure-resistant had issues maintaining friendship and avoidant struggled with intimacy in romantic relationships

182
Q

Why are attachment types often passed through generations in families

A

Parenting style based on internal working model

183
Q

What was Bailey et al study using 99mothers

A

Considered attachment of 99mothers to their babies and then to their own mothers, mother-baby attachment was assessed using strange situation and mother-mother attachment assessed using adult attachment interview

184
Q

What were Bailey et al attachment findings

A

Majority of women had the same attachment classification both to their baby and to their mother

185
Q

What classic study did Hazan and Shaver procedure

A

Analysed 620 replies to a love quiz in a local American newspaper, the quiz had 3 sections: 1st assessed respondents currant or most important relationship, 2nd assessed general love experiences such as number of partners, 3rd assessed attachment type by asking respondents to chose which 3statements best describe their feelings

186
Q

What was the love quiz aim

A

To look at association between attachment and adult relationships

187
Q

What were Hazan and Shaver love quiz findings

A

56% of respondents were securely attached, 25% were insecure-avoidant, 19% were insecure-resistant

188
Q

What were the conclusions from Hazan and shavers love quiz

A

Those with secure attachment were likely to have good, long lasting romantic experiences, avoidant respondents tend to revel jealously and fear of intimacy, findings suggest patterns of attachment behaviour are reflected in romantic relationships

189
Q

What is a strength of research into attachment and later relationships

A

There is Supporting evidence

190
Q

What did Fearon and Roisman do in terms of attachment and later relationships

A

Reviewed these studies and concluded that early attachment consistently predicts later attachment, emotional well being and attachment to own children

191
Q

What does later development depend on

A

How strong the relationship is between early attachment type and later development depends on both attachment type and aspects of later development

192
Q

What does insecure avoidant and disorganised attachment convey about later development

A

Insecure avoidant shows mild disadvantages in development and disorganised attachment is strongly associated with later mental health

193
Q

What does secure attachment convey compared to disorganised attachment

A

If a baby is secure coveys advantages for their future development while while disorganised appears to seriously disadvantage a child

194
Q

What is a disadvantage of research into attachment and later relationships

A

Not all evidence supports close link between early attachment and later development

195
Q

What was Becker-stoll et al longitudinal study

A

They studied 43 individuals from 1year old, at age 16 attachment was assessed using adult attachment interviews and there was no evidence of continuity

196
Q

What does not all supporting evidence mean for research into attachment and later relationships

A

Means it is not clear to what extent quality of early attachment really predicts later development, there may be other important factors

197
Q

What is a limitation of attachment and later relationships

A

Most research into the influence of attachment is early attachment is assessed retrospectively

198
Q

What are most research between link of early attachment and later development not

A

They aren’t longitudinal and don’t assess attachment in early life and the revisit same person in later life

199
Q

What do researchers often do instead of longitudinal studies

A

Researchers often ask adolescent or adult participants questions of their relationships with their parents and identify attachment type from this

200
Q

What are two validity issues does not doing a longitudinal study for early attachment

A

1-asking questions relies on honesty and accurate perception of participants, 2-means it is hard whether early attachment or adult attachment is being assessed

201
Q

What does most studies into early attachment and later development not being longitudinal mean

A

Means the measures of early attachment used in most studies may be confounded with other factors making them meaningless

202
Q

What is another limitation of early attachment and later development studies

A

The existence of cofounding variables

203
Q

What do some studies like McCarthys assess that is a good thing

A

Attachment in infancy which means early attachment is valid but even these studies may have validity problems as association between attachment quality and later development may be effected by cofounding variables

204
Q

What is an example of cofounding variable in early attachment and later development studies

A

Parenting style may influence both attachment quality and later development, alternately genetically influenced personality may be an influence on both factors

205
Q

What does confounding variables mean about early attachment and later development

A

Means that we can never be entirely sure that it is early attachment and not some other factor that is influencing later development