Intro to Cultural Psych Flashcards
Kroeber & Kluckholm’s academic definitions of culture
- Descriptive definition
- Historical definition
- Normative Definition
- Structural Definition
- Psychological definition
Kroeber & Kluckholm: descriptive definition of culture
- culture refers to “all social activities in the broadest sense, such as language, marriage, property system, etiquette, industries, art, etc.”
- Ex. Definition of German culture: people speaking a Germanic language who have a diet consisting of lots of meat
Kroeber & Kluckholm: historical definition of culture
- culture is the total heredity (vs. Biological heredity) of mankind, while as a specific term a culture means a particular strain of social hierarchy
- Ex. Definition of Chinese culture: people with 5000 years of history characterized by philosophical and scholarly progress
Kroeber & Kluckholm: normative definition of culture
- culture is all standardized social procedures and customs, passed on socially, that form a people’s way of life
- Ex. Definition of Korean culture: people who are younger are socially required to be respectful to people who are older than them
Kroeber & Kluckholm: structural definition of culture
- Structural definition: culture is a system or organization of interdependent values common to specific social groups, forming a pattern unique to each society
- Ex. Korean culture: respect elders -> demonstrating respect for authority
Kroeber & Kluckholm: psychological definition of culture
Psychological definition: culture consists of all results of human-learned effort at adjustment to pressures (emphasis on learning)
Our textbook’s definitions of culture
- INFORMATION acquired from other members of one’s species through social learning can that affect one’s behaviours (more psychological)
- GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS existing in some shared context (more descriptive)
Issues with defining culture
- Cultural boundaries are fuzzy boundaries: difficult to know where one ‘culture’ ends and another begins (ex. Because China borders so many different countries, you’ll see different types of culture in different locations)
- Constant changes: culture changes over time (ex. Support for gay marriage and marijuana has increased with time)
- Often more differences within cultural groups than between cultural groups (ex. China: Northeast has more Mongolian and Korean culture, southwest culture influenced by rice farming, etc.)
Evolution of general psychology & cultural psychology: Wilhelm Wundt
founding father of psych in the early 1900s, established one of the first psych labs in Germany studying low-level processes like memory; established importance of strict experimental controls; later focused on higher-level processes like language, religion, etc. (what we would consider culture) -> argued that when we study these things, we need to relax experimental controls
Evolution of general psychology & cultural psychology: John B. Watson
founder of behaviourism in the early 1900s (behaviourism = human behaviours are simply what can be objectively measured as stimulus-response patterns) -> if we can’t measure something using stimulus-response patterns, it’s not psychology
Evolution of general psychology & cultural psychology: Cognitive revolution
psychologists recognized that humans have thoughts, feelings, and mental processes with that have meaning -> rise of computers led to use of computer as metaphor for brain -> assumed that brains were the same; that non-western brains were the same as western brains -> culture became statistical noise to be controlled for
Evolution of general psychology & cultural psychology: Richard Shweder
in the 1980s, Richard Shweder recommended that we think in more nuanced ways about that metaphor -> brains are active and influence environment (we create art and architecture, etc.) -> mind and environment mutually constitute each other (culture cannot be eliminated as statistical noise)
Universality tree
Is it cognitively available?
- If not -> non-universal (cultural invention -> cognitive tool not found in all cultures; ex. abacus)
- If so, is it used the same way?
- If not -> existential universal (cognitive tool found in all cultures, but serves different functions in different cultures; ex. criticism)
- If so, does it have the same accessibility?
- – If not -> functional universal (cognitive tool serves the same function in all cultures, but present in different degrees; ex. punishment)
- – If so -> accessibility universal (no variation -> cognitive tool equally accessible in, and serves the same purpose across all cultures; ex. Social facilitation)
Examples of culturally universal things vs. culturally variable thing
- Culturally universal things:
- Ability count to 2
- Label for black
- Smiling when happy
- Culturally variable things:
- Ability to count to 3+
- Label for blue
- Sticking tongue out when feeling embarrassed
How might something be universal and culturally specific at the same time?
- More culturally variable = more specific
- Ex. mathematical computation beyond 2
- More universal = more general
- Ex. mathematical computation