Acculturation and Globalization Flashcards
acculturation
- Consequences of people from different cultural groups being in continuous first-hand contact → change occurs in one or both groups
- Not just about the non-dominant group adjusting to the dominant groups → bi-directional relationship
- Can occur at group-level or individual-level
group-level acculturation
- 3 possible outcomes:
- destructive
- reactive
- creative
- none of these outcomes are inherently positive or negative
group-level acculturation: destructive outcomes
- Loss of culture through absorption or elimination due to continuous contact with another cultural group
- Ex. Indian Residential School System (negative outcome); loss of dangerous/painful cultural practices like foot binding (positive outcome)
group-level acculturation: reactive outcomes
- Groups re-establish their original cultures by revitalizing or reaffirming them
- Ex. language schools (ie. Chinese school), language revitalization efforts (ie. Squamish immersion house)
group-level outcomes: creative outcomes
- New cultures or cultural information emerge through interactions between the original cultures
- Ex. fusion food, religion (different practices across the world)
individual-level acculturation
- Acculturation takes on multiple strategies that reflect how people reconcile norms and values of:
- Culture of origin
- Culture of dominant society
- Acculturation strategies:
- unidimensional model (mutual exclusion model)
- 2-dimensional model
individual-level acculturation: unidimensional model
- Assimilation: adopting mainstream culture and rejecting heritage culture
- Separation: rejecting mainstream culture and retaining heritage culture
- Both of these strategies assume that adoption of dominant norms and values is inversely related to retention of original norms and values
individual-level acculturation: 2-dimensional model
- Mainstream identification can be high or low
- Heritage identification can be high or low
- Leads to 4 acculturation styles:
- Integration, assimilation, separation, marginalization
2-dimensional model: integration
- Strongly identifies with both mainstream and heritage culture; positive feelings towards both
- Participate in host culture but maintain traditions of heritage culture
- Most successful strategy (more social support - social networks in both cultures)
2-dimensional model: assimilation
- Strongly identifies with mainstream culture, but not with heritage culture; positive feelings towards mainstream, negative feelings towards heritage
- Participate in host culture and leave behind traditions of heritage culture
2-dimensional model: separation
- Strongly identifies with heritage culture, not with mainstream culture; positive feelings towards heritage, negative towards mainstream
- Ignore host culture and maintain traditions of heritage culture
2-dimensional model: marginalization
- No identification with either culture; negative feelings towards both
- Least common strategy
predictors of acculturation strategies
- High prejudice from host culture → high levels of separation
- Migrant’s lower socioeconomic status → high levels of marginalization or separation (financially “locked out” of host culture)
- Host valuing cultural diversity and multiculturalism → higher integration or assimilation
impacts of acculturation strategies
Even second and third generation Muslim Europeans have engaged in extremist radicalization → prejudice against Muslim migrants accounts for significant component of radicalization process
global orientation
- Individual differences in receptiveness to cultural globalization
- Can be affective, cognitive, and behavioural
- 2 types of responses: proactive responses and defensive responses