Chapter 6 Flashcards
Twenty Statements Test
- Asked to come up with 20 statements to respond to the question “I am —”
- Western cultures (Americans, Australians, Brits, Canadians) more likely to use personal characteristics
- People in other places in the world (Asians, Africans, Indians, Masai/Samburu, Native Americans) more likely to use social role/identity statements
- Different brain activity occurs for Western vs. non-western cultural groups when asked to think about personal characteristics (or social roles)
ingroups vs. outgroups: differences due to indep vs. interdep view of self
- Ingroups/outgroups more stable and important in interdep
- Interdep less likely to trust people in the outgroup
- Conformity more contingent on ingroups/outgroups for interdep (much more likely to conform to ingroups, less likely to conform to outgroups)
individualism vs. collectivism: similarities
- Should be thought of as a continuum, not discrete categories
- Can be influenced by culture (ie. encountering more collectivistic situations on a daily basis, facilitating your collectivistic view)
individualism vs. collectivism: definitions
- Individualism: more likely to focus on independent aspects of themselves, feel distinct from others, prioritize being self-sufficient (more common in places like Can, US, Aus, Europe; and in people with high SES)
- Majority of psychological research done on individualistic people
- Collectivism: more likely to focus on interdependent aspects of their self-concepts, like close relationships and group memberships (more common in Africa, Asia, South America; and in people with low SES)
Gender and culture: differences in traits
- tested differences in collectivism, agency, assertiveness, and relatedness (ex. helping people in need because you can almost feel their pain) in men vs. women → wanted to see whether men were more individualistic and women were more collectivistic
- Only difference was in relatedness (women scored higher)
culture and gender equality: sex role ideology study
- investigated people’s attitudes towards how men and women should act
- Egalitarian views in individualistic, northern, urbanized, more Christian places (ie. Netherlands, FInland, Germany)
- Traditional views in places in collectivistic, southern, less urbanized, more Muslim places (ie. India, Pakistan, Nigeria)
- In each culture, men and women tended to share the same views, though men were usually slightly more traditional
influence of shifting vs. plow cultivation on gender norms
- Shifting: people dig up earth themselves → women participate more in labour sphere
- Plow: people lead animals as they plow earth → women participate less in labour sphere, much more in domestic sphere
- The early method a culture used (shift or plow) has lasting impacts on gender norms
essentialization
- If a certain gender is more “essentialized” in a culture, it means that it’s thought to reflect an underlying unchangeable essence; there are less socially acceptable ways to express it
- Generally, the gender associated with power in a culture is more essentialized (male in America, female in India)
cognitive dissonance
- The distressing feeling we have when we act inconsistently → 2 options: become more consistent, or change your attitudes to stop appearing inconsistent (dissonance reduction)
- After making a tough decision, we can reduce cognitive dissonance by rationalization (playing up the good aspects of our choice and vice versa)
- Related to self-consistency → assumes we have powerful motivation to be consistent
cognitive dissonance CD study
- In Heine’s CD study, Canadians reduced dissonance after a tough choice using rationalization, but Japanese did not (but apparently will be more likely to do it if it’s a decision that involves others)
- More individualistic cultures are more concerned with staying consistent to themselves, whereas more collectivistic cultures are more concerned with staying consistent to others (ex. doing what peers would do)
2 types of self-awareness
- Objective self-awareness: viewing yourself through a “me” state/through the POV of others (the way others perceive us); as if we were an object; concerned with ourselves; from the outside-in; “third person imagery”
- More common with interdependent self-construal
- Subjective self-awareness: viewing yourself through an “I” state/through your own POV (the way we perceive the world); concerned with the world around us; largely unaware of ourselves; from the inside-out; “first-person imagery”
- More common with independent self-construal
self-awareness: Heine’s mirror study
When people with independent self-construals (ie. Americans) are placed in front of a mirror, it puts them in a state of objective self-awareness and they become more self-critical; this effect doesn’t happen for people with interdependent self-construals (ie. Japanese) because they’re pretty much always in a state of objective self-awareness
self-views (related to self-awareness)
- people tend to be more accurate in their judgments about the ways others will behave compared to the ways they’ll behave
- People from collectivistic cultures and/or with interdependent self-construal tend to be more accurate when predicting their behaviour
how do incremental or entity theories impact education?
- Can influence types of tests students do
- Ex. American SATs are supposed to evaluate innate ability (entity theory); Japanese university exams are supposed to be based on how much you study (incremental theory)
- Can influence difficulty of tests
- Ex. American bar exam easier than Japanese → reflects Japanese incremental theory of self (expected that you’ll fail at first, then study harder and improve)
Limitations of the Big 5
- May not provide sufficient coverage to capture all variation in the world - would the same 5 factors emerge if questionnaires were developed from trait terms in different languages?
- Research shows no: additional/different factors occur in Chinese, Filipino, South African, and other languages (openness is least cross-culturally reliable)
- Vast majority of studies that use it have been with WEIRD samples (studies with rural, non-industrialized populations don’t tend to support the Big 5)