Intra Flashcards
There are multiple factors that may affect a constable’s perceptions of online fraud
agences ayant des procédures et des politqiues claires(Agencies with no clearly written policies on how to respond to victims may make it harder for constables to understand the similarities between traditional crime and online fraud and how they should respond accordingly )
, he individual constable’s views toward online incidents and offenses are also likely to shape their willingness to investigate and pursue investigationsConstables who view online frauds as similar to those occurring offline may feel more prepared to respond to cases
The received constables’ occupational training and their on-the-job experiences may also shape their feelings of preparedness toward these offenses. Specifically, constables’ skill and comfort with technology with more personal experience with technology may be more aware of the potential risks for victimization and theft
Prior cybercrime training and experience investigating these cases in the field may also lead constables to feel more prepared by improving their awareness of the negative consequences of fraud (ense que la police néglige et que ça devrait plus être un priorité)
Occupational and demographic backgrounds of constables may also influence their ability to respond to online fraud calls for service
===Response officers typically serve in general patrol roles and are the primary point of contact for the public
=== Criminal Investigation constables may be detectives, and typically handle complex cases which may include fraud Thus, individuals serving in CID roles may be more likely to deal with fraud cases generally and feel more prepared to respond.
===It is also unclear how race and gender may influence constables’ feelings of preparedness. Limited research has found that white officers were more likely to agree that cybercrime was not taken seriously by law enforcement while males and females differed on views of cybercrime severity (Bossler and Holt 2012; Holt et al. 2018). Constables with less formal education may be less likely to feel prepared
Comment défineriez vous la fraude ?
Fraud can be broadly defined as the criminal acquisitiion d’argent ou la propriété d’une vicitme par la tromperie, la manipulation, la tricherie.
Pourquoi la fraude a migré vers le cyberespace plutôt que de se faire en eprsonne ?
Accès à une grande population simultanément. greater impact on victims through virtual environments
Il existe plusieurs types de cyberfraude, qu’ont-ils en commun ?
request for money or personal information from a victim
Online fraud (also known as cyberfraud or Internet fraud) poses a significant challenge to society
with emotional and economic losses for the millions of victims affected by these crimes every day
En quoi L’intervention policière n’est non seulement pas satisfaisante en ce qui à trait à la fraude, mais en quoi elle peut même être négative ?
Their response may actually make the experience worse due to officers’ negative perceptions of both victims and the offenses (having their victimization trivialized by officers, and finding themselves blamed for their own victimization )
en ce qui à trait à sa dénonciation, en quoi la fraude est un crime particulièrement unique ?
Fraud is unique to other crime types in that there is a multiplicity of agencies to which victims can report. This includes the police but also extends to consumer protection, financial institutions, and several government and non-government agencies.this encompasses the criminal justice system, civil system, and other statutory and private systems.
the general constabulary often serves as the first point of contact for crime victims, regardless of the offense
fraud has historically not been the priority of police agencies, pourquoi ?
This is reflected in the absence of fraud being listed as a performance target for police agencies (a lack of recognition in published police priority areas
increased focus among police on street crimes may reinforce the myth that fraud is not a serious offense,
In subsequent years, many factors have contributed to a perceived decline in the ability of police to respond to fraud, quels sont-ils?
shifting policing priorities, reducing budgets, changing management structures, and demanding constables spend time engaging in front-line and public-facing services
general lack of resources, few specialists dedicated to fraud, the complex nature of reporting online fraud cases, and limited information sharing from the national to local level (
The concurrent rise in a centralized police response to fraud may be part of this issue taht police has problem to respond to fraud, how come ?
leading local police to feel they have no real response role in these crimes (D’autres agences s’occupent du problèem)
Quelles recommandations peut-on tirer de l’étude de Bossler ?
Beyond agency-level resources, there may be substantial value in the implementation of early training programs to ensure incoming generations of constables realize the problem of cybercrime generally and online fraud specifically
===a system-wide training program for select officers would help facilitate a knowledge base that would create cascading benefits
this study demonstrated the value of creating, implementing, and reinforcing policies and procedures related to online incidents and crime.
this study suggests agencies without clear policies and procedures about online fraud incidents should be encouraged to create and discuss them with the constabulary. Having educational materials to provide to victims did not make officers feel better prepared to respond.
In addition, this study demonstrated that constables’ exposure to online fraud cases in the field shapes their perceived ability to respond to these cases
==Thus, promoting awareness of these cases and investigations during agency shift meetings may prove value to help diffuse best practices within the agency, which should also improve officers’ ability to respond
Beyond agency-level resources, there may be substantial value in the implementation of early training programs to ensure incoming generations of constables realize the problem of cybercrime generally and online fraud specifically.
===Beyond agency-level resources, there may be substantial value in the implementation of early training programs to ensure incoming generations of constables realize the problem of cybercrime generally and online fraud specifically.
el. While recommendations from research can influence policy makers, police administrators generally follow one of three paths in the adoption of innovative practices and policies, quels sont-ils ?
contingency theory posits that organizations change their behavior as a rational response to a perceived threat (these crimes are increasing across jurisdiction)
The second explanation for policing policy change comes from resource dependence theory. Police departments depend on financial support from local, state, and federal governments. This dependence affects departments’ abilities to realize goals and they often must conform to resource providers’ expectations or risk losing scare resources
Third, police leaders often implement new policies because they are following their peers’ lead. Institutional theory proposes police department adopt practices to appear legitimate to other agencies and industry principals
===As early adopters in the policing industry, typically big city agencies, implement practices and then promote them, smaller agencies begin to copy them
Apart from the immense material damage that can result from fraud, intentional deception often results in what ?
long-term mental damage and a general loss of interpersonal trust for its victims.
Convincingly deceiving fraud someone requires what ?
assuming another person’s perspective and emotional world, mentally generating and remembering complex sequences of action,
Unlike most other groups of offenders, fraudsters who deceive their victims face-to-face appear to have what ?
particularly good cognitive and socio-emotional abilities, especially a high level of self-control.
===fraudsters seem to have very good observational abilities and to be extremely sensitive to the perception of the emotional state of their counterparts