Improving Stress Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the aim of Michenbaum?

A

Compare SIT with standard behaviour systematic desensitisation and a control group on a waiting list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the method used in Michenbaum?

A

Field experiment, assessed before and after treatment

Self report and grade average used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who were the pps in Michenbaum?

A

21 students ages 17-25 who responded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the design used in Michenbaum?

A

Matched pairs design, randomly allocated to either SIT therapy, waiting list group or standardised desensitisation group
Matched on gender and anxiety levels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the procedure in Michenbaum?

A

Each pp tested via Q then allocated to group.
SIT- receiver 8 sessions, given insight approach prior to test to help gather thoughts. Given pos statement Said+ relaxation method to use in test.
System- 8 sessions, progressive relaxation training, encouraged to practise at home.
Control-told on waiting list, receive therapy in future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the results in Michenbaum?

A

Performance in tests improved in SIT compared to other 2
Significant difference between 2therapy and control
SIT showed more improvement in anxiety levels
Both therapy groups higher than control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the conclusion in Michenbaum?

A

SIT more effective was to reduce anxiety in students, prone to tests.
More effective than behavioural such as systematic as it adds a cognitive component.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the aim in Budzyski?

A

See whether biofeedback is an effective method of reducing tension headaches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the method in Budzyski?

A

Experimental method, patients trained in a lab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who were the pps in Budzyski?

A

18 pps who replied to an advertisement in local paper in Colorado

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the design used in Budzyski?

A

Independent measures, pps randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the procedure for Budzyski?

A

For 2 weeks, patients kept record of headaches.
A+B had 16 sessions, 2 a week for 8 weeks
Group A- taught relaxation, slower clicks of biofeedback machine= less tension, vise versa
Group B- told concentrate on varying clicks, given pseudo feedback.
Group C- no training, told start it in 2 months.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the results in Budzyski?

A

After 3 months, A’s muscle tension significantly lower than B’s
A’s reported headaches dropped significantly, significantly lower than B+C
Drug use in A lower than B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the conclusion from Budzyski?

A

. Biofeedback effective training for patients to relax and reduce tension headaches, effective method of stress management.
. Relaxation training more effective than just being monitored, but better when with biofeedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the aim of Waxler-Morrison?

A

See how social relationships influences response to breast cancer survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the method used in Waxler-Morrison?

A

Quasi with women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Independent measures as women had existing social networks

17
Q

Who were the pps in Waxler-Morrison?

A

133 women under 55 years old

18
Q

What was the procedure in Waxler-Morrison?

A

Mailed self-examination Q, gathering info on their demography and existing SN, education level, who they responsible for, contact, f+f, perception of others.
psychometric test of SN, combined marital status, contact with f+f, church membership.
Details of diagnosis abstracted from medical records, 80-81, survival+ recurrence rates checked from records jan 85

19
Q

What were the results in Waxler-Morrison?

A

6 aspects of SN significantly linked with survival:

Marital status, support from friends, contact with friends, total support, SN, employment.

20
Q

What was the conclusion from Waxler-Morrison?

A

The more SN and support, the higher the survival rate of women with breast cancer.
Type of cancer still a main factor.