*important concepts* Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

having a then b
and b then a

A

counter balancing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

participants and researcher dont know which group is which

A

double-blind control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

small scale study first to see limitations and imprive

A

pilot study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

thing that actually has no affect

A

placebo

can be a pill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

reducing dividing bias

A

random allocation

can be with wheel spinner, names in hat, flipping coin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

researcher knows which group is which, placebo or real

participants dont

A

single blind control

controls placebo effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cross-sectional design:

A

Comparing two or more groups on a particular variable at a specific time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Event sampling:

A

A data collection strategy for observational studies. This is when the researcher makes note only when a specific behavior is observed. For example, only when aggression is observed on the playground.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

quantitive data aims

A

for generalisation and is stistical, can determine % chance and relpicated/compared easily

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

qualititave data is

A

subjectivr and hard to analyse but specific to people

can asses findings and potentially generalise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

for qualitative the researchder nends to be

A

professional with subject since it is over as long term their releatinship cant form, and need to pºrotoect participants trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

participant effectsss

A

reactivity
(act diffrent cause of being watchrd
conformity effrct
social desirsability (dont wanna be judged
expectancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

triangulation

A

theory tri (cognititive, bio, socioal apporach)
researcher tri
method tri (can prove results are not chance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

relextivity

A

personal- researcher reflects to see is their own biases have affected

epistemological- they reflect about the method and of thast made a diffrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

a case study is not a

A

method,

it has many methods but itsself is a collection/report of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

holistic

A

everything is connected, explained onlw wich the whole image

17
Q

case studies cant be

A

repeated, generaslised, data hard to asnaluyse, attrition of participsntds
researcher can delevop releayionships eith aprticipsants

18
Q

planning something

A

Type of data colection method
how to mske ethicaln
AIM
data? what type and how to collect
defined variabçes
ethicaç
TRIANGULATION

19
Q

case studies can be transferability

A

transferability generalised

depending on sample size, dirversity, location socio-economic makeup

can be more generaslised if many studies have the same result

20
Q

sturctured invertiws are good for

A

when researcher wants to know specific things
standardised
can be repeated

21
Q

sturctured invertiws are bad for

A

priming from previous q
demand
low eco validity
limit to what can be asked

22
Q

focus groups are

A

quick and give more credibility since +1 perdon hears what is said

23
Q

unstructured interviews

A

are like tell me what you saw/happened

good for holocaust surfvivours
can ask confrmnation questions but R wont influencer results

hard to standardise/draw concusionsn