I&G Week 7 Person Perception Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the raw materials of social perception?

A

Physical appearance
Behaviour
Situational factors
– (e.g. where you live, your friends, your job)
Communications from other people (tell us about the person)
Communications from the person themselves

(Ichheiser, 1949)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some of the reasons for personality misinterpretations?

A

The tendency to overestimate the unity of personality (if see someone behaving in a way in one context- we assume they will behave the same in other contexts)

Stereotyped classifications as sources of misinterpretations.

Limits of insight as sources of misinterpretation- (we tend to believe we know what’s going on in other peoples lives- when we don’t actually know)

Mechanisms of rigidity- (we view personality as something that is fixed- does not change over our lifespan)

The tendency to overestimate the role of personal and to underestimate the role of situational factors- ( e.g. may see someone who looks anxious at the dentist- then may believe they are an anxious person in general-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Asch say about forming impressions?

A

Impression formation is very fast- we immediately form an impression of their character.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Primacy effects

What study did Asch conduct?

A

Asch (1946), Experiment 6

Lists of traits of two individuals:

Target A: intelligent—industrious—impulsive—critical—stubborn—envious
Target B: envious—stubborn—critical—impulsive—industrious—intelligent
What do you think of these two people?

They gave the same adjectives, but put them in a different order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Primacy effects

What were the results of Asch study?

A

For person A- they were given a more positive description, as the first adjectives in the lost describing the individual were positive.

For person B- given a more negative description- as the negative adjectives were first.

Conclusion- the order depends on how the person is perceived- it matters which information is presented first- which is then used to understand the subsequent information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Central traits

Asch 1946 - what was the study?

A

Asch (1946), Experiment 1

Lists of traits of two individuals:
Target A: intelligent—skillful—industrious—warm—determined—practical—cautious
Target B: intelligent—skillful—industrious—cold—determined—practical—cautious

What do you think of these two people?

Only difference is A is “warm” and B is “cold” (character traits). They key trait then shapes how the other traits are viewed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Central traits

What was the conclusion from Asch 1946 study?

A

we are very quick to form judgement & observations.

The central traits (warmth & coldness) effected the interpretation of all the other traits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What two traits were argued to be particularly important when forming impressions of others?

A

“warmth” & “competence”

They argued they are fundamental & universal dimensions of how we judge others as individuals.

They are central for aspects of stereotypes too.

Argue- whether we see someone as warm/ cold will affect our emotions towards the person

Also affect the actions we are motivated to take towards others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some examples of stereotypes for low/ high competence & warmth?

A

High warmth- low competence:
- Elderly
- People with disabilities
- Children

Low competence- low warmth:
-Poor
- Homeless people
- Immigrants

High competence- high warmth:
- Citizens
- Middle class
- Majority groups

High competence- low warmth:
- Rich people
- Professionals
- Technical experts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who was the originator or attribution theory?

A

Fritz Heider

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Heider believe about how we view others behaviour?

A

When see someone behaving in a certain way- it captures our attention.

We then ignore the context surrounding the behaviour which may explain why they are behaving in that way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is attribution theory?

A

Heider (1958) idea of “naïve psychology” (all have different ideas on how peoples brains work/ how people think)

Attribution theory is concerned with how people make causal explanations for their own and others’ behaviour (Kelley, 1973).

Focused on how we as social perceivers use information to arrive at these causal explanations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the different types of attribution?

A

Dispositional vs situational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is dispositional attribution?

A

Process of assigning a behavior’s cause to internal characteristics such as personality traits, efforts, moods, judgements, abilities, motives, or beliefs

(about the person themselves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is situational attribution?

A

Assigns the behavior’s cause to an event or situation outside the individual’s control such as the weather, other people’s attitudes, time, task difficulty, and luck

(external factors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is correspondent inference theory interested in?
(Jones & Davis, 1965)

A

Concerned with the conditions under which people will make dispositional attributions of others’ behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the factors in correspondent inference theory?

A

choice- (if someone chose to behave in a way- it reflects what the person is like.)

social desirability-(if behaviour is desirable- they did it to do the right thing & its not a true reflection of their own disposition- how they would naturally behave.

social roles- (if the behaviour is fulfilling a role that you would expect them to fill- then their behaviour is more to do with the role then the person.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Example study: Jones and Harris (1967) and the attitude attribution paradigm

What did they do in the study?

A

Participants (N = 41) read essays on Castro’s Cuba (communist leader- controversial topic at time)

Informed that a student had written the essay in response to the following instructions:

either (a) “Based on the past week’s discussion and lectures, write a short cogent criticism of Castro’s Cuba as if you were giving the opening statement in a debate”

or (b) “…short cogent defence of Castro’s Cuba as if…”

or (c) “…. short cogent essay either defending or criticizing Castro’s Cuba as if …”.

200-word pro-Castro or anti-Castro essay
Asked to judge characteristics of author and estimate their true attitude towards Castro

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Example study: Jones and Harris (1967) and the attitude attribution paradigm

What were the results from the study?

A

When the student believed that the individual writing the essay was given a choice on their argument- and the essay was positive towards Castro- they believed the students actual attitude was positive.

If the individual wrote a negative essay and was given the choice- they believed their actual attitude held was negative.

20
Q

What is correspondence bias?

A

The correspondence bias is the tendency to draw inferences about a person’s unique and enduring dispositions from behaviors that can be entirely explained by the situations in which they occur.

21
Q

What is the fundamental attribution error?

A

Says we tend to underestimate the impact of situational factors & overestimate the role of dispositional factors- when trying to explain peoples behaviour.

22
Q

Cognitive load

Gilbert and Malone (1995) suggest attribution processes happen in what two stages?

A

Dispositional inference (automatic and instant)

Situational correction (takes effort and attention)

When we see someone behaving in a certain way- our first reaction is to believe their behaviour is due to what they are like as a person (dispositional inference)

If we then have the cognitive resources- we will think further & look into the situational corrections & come to a more balanced judgement.

23
Q

Cognitive load

What can increases in cognitive load (e.g. distraction tasks) result in?

What does cognitive load increase?

A

Can undermine situational corrections (people don’t have the mental capacity to make these corrections.)

Cognitive load- increases dispositional inference.

24
Q

What has research on dispositional and situational inferences found?

A

Research on group differences in people’s tendencies to make dispositional or situational attributions.

Study in USA- between liberals vs conservatives
Found liberals more likely to pay attention to situational factors when explaining someone’s behaviour.

25
Q

What people are there more situational inferences amongst?

A

Liberals vs. conservatives (Skitka et al., 2002) (liberals take more attention to situational attributions when explaining peoples behvaiour)

Cross cultural differences- East Asian vs. North American participants (Asians take more situational attributions)
(Miller, 1984; Morris & Peng, 1994)

26
Q

What are the possible reasons for different groups/ people making situational/ dispositional inferences?

A

Different groups have different automatic inferences to start with (some groups may look at the situation first- then the disposition).

Different groups may be motivated to make the correction- take effort to think about the situation.

Difference in cognitive style- holistic/ analytic thinking (typically differs between East Asian & Western people.

Different group agency beliefs

27
Q

What is Thomas Theorem?

A

If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences.

In other words, the interpretation of a situation causes the action. This interpretation is not objective.

28
Q

What is a self-fulfilling prophency?

A

“The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behaviour which makes the original false conception come ‘true’.
(you behave according to your false conception of whats happened)

This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning”
(you behave according to what you think is true- making what you thought come true & you believing that you were always right)

Merton 1968

29
Q

What is a self-fulfilling prophency?

A

“The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behaviour which makes the original false conception come ‘true’.
(you behave according to your false conception of whats happened)

This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning”
(you behave according to what you think is true- making what you thought come true & you believing that you were always right)

Merton 1968

30
Q

What study was made by Rosenthal & Jacobson 1968?

A

Pygmalion in the classroom

31
Q

Who was the study, Pygmalion in the classroom, made by?

A

Rosenthal & Jacobson 1968?

32
Q

What happened in the study, Pygmalion in the classroom?

A

Told primary teachers some students would be “growth spurters” in scholastic achievement

Fake “Harvard Test of Inflected Acquisition”

Actually randomly assigned

Children labelled as “growth spurters” showed significant gains in IQ compared to peers

Strongest effects in youngest age groups

33
Q

Who was the behavioural confirmation study by?

A

Snyder & Swann, 1978

34
Q

What happened in the behavioural confirmation study ?
Snyder & Swann, 1978

A

Experimental study of self-fulfilling prophecies

Male students (N = 108) in groups of three
(1) labelling perceiver, (2) target, (3) naïve perceiver

Target labelled as “hostile” vs. “non-hostile”
- based on fake survey of labelling perceiver and target
- additional attribution manipulation … (2x2 design)

Behavioural measure of hostility
‘noise weapon’ in reaction time task
labelling perceiver records impression of target

35
Q

What were the findings of the study- confirmation study ?
Snyder & Swann, 1978

A

When the labelling perceiver had been told that the target was hostile, the target ended up using the noise weapon more.

The target didn’t know how they had been labelled.

Their behaviour ended up to confirm the false information that had been given about them.

(This is a classic self-fulfilling prophency)

36
Q

What were the findings of the study- confirmation study ?
Snyder & Swann, 1978

What were the labelling perceivers final impressions of the targets?

A

If they had been told they were hostile & aggressively played with the noise weapon- the labelling perceiver believed they were therefore more aggressive.

37
Q

What was the attribution manipulation?

Snyder & Swann, 1978

A

Half participants- Disposition attribution (Use of noise weapon reflects their own personal characteristics)

Half participants- Situation attribution (Use of noise weapon reflects how the opponents treated them)

38
Q

Snyder & Swann, 1978

What did the naive perceiver do/ what were they told?

A

They are the third person- haven’t been told anything about the target.
They do the same task with the noise weapon.
The naive perceiver records their impression of the target.

39
Q

Snyder & Swann, 1978

What were the findings with the naive perceiver?

A

There was an interaction effect.

The effect of the label is different- depending on whether they were in the dispositional/ situational condition.

When they were told the noise weapon was a reflection of their own characteristics- the target went on being more hostile in the second interaction with the new person.

The non-hostile labelled target went on to be less hostile/ aggressive.

When told the situation explained peoples use of the weapon- the effect was wiped out.

40
Q

Behavioural confirmation

What are some other studies which show the same effects?

A

Attractiveness stereotypes (Snyder, Tanke, & Berscheid, 1977)
‘Male’ perceivers and ‘female’ targets in audio conversation
Males photographed and shown false photo of female target
Attractive photo 🡪 more sociable behaviour

Gender stereotypes (Skrypnek & Snyder, 1982)

Ethnic stereotypes (Chen & Bargh, 1997)
Extraversion (Fazio et al., 1981)- led to behave in a more extroverted/ introvert ways.

Age and task difficulty (Musser & Graziano, 1991) believe wrongly child is older or younger- so given wrong difficulty of task

Basketball ability (Weaver et al., 2016)- given false expectations about basketball ability- led to players performing more or less well.

41
Q

summary- person perception?

A

Person perception is often inaccurate or biased

Ichheiser suggests that misperception of others is widespread- bad at perceiving others.

Impressions depend on order of information

Impressions strongly influenced by ‘central traits’- warmth/ competence.

42
Q

Summary- attributions?

A

Attributions are often oversimplified

Focus on simple dispositional inferences

Correct for complex situations only if resources

Initially false perceptions of others can become self-fulfilling via behavioural confirmation

43
Q

Ashanti folk theory-

What is this?

A

On different days of the week
Different types of kra (soul) enter the body
Produce different dispositions (not destiny)

Monday’s boy-child
Soul name of Kwadwo
‘quiet, retiring, peaceful’

Wednesday’s boy-child
Soul name of Kwaku
‘quick-tempered, aggressive, trouble maker’

44
Q

Ashanti folk theory

What are monday children?

A

Monday’s boy-child
Soul name of Kwadwo
‘quiet, retiring, peaceful’

45
Q

Ashanti folk theory

What are wednesdays children?

A

Wednesday’s boy-child
Soul name of Kwaku
‘quick-tempered, aggressive, trouble maker’

46
Q

What was Gustav Jahodas study?

A

Gustav Jahoda (1954)
Sampling

446 delinquents (Juvenile Court records: 1948-1953)

1254 schoolboys (all boys in 10 schools)
Jahoda tested statistical associations between

Day of birth (kradin)

Delinquency (schoolboy vs delinquent)
Type of offence (against person vs other)