History and Theories of Management Flashcards
Individualism
- individual employee, his unique characteristics, needs and motivations are important
- individual is the primary unit of analysis
- god calls individuals to specific work
Key Concepts:
- employee autonomy
- recognition of diversity
- employee empowerment
Materialism
- focus on the tangible & material aspects of an organization
- pragmatic, results oriented approach
Key Concepts:
- profit maximization
- resource efficiency
- short-term focus
Productivity vs. Efficiency
Productivity - producing maximum effort under a certain amount of time
Efficiency - how resources are used in production (time, resources, etc.)
Scientific Management Theory
- Organizing “Classical” Era (1910-1930)
- Micro Approach
- Fredrick W. Taylor
- defining and maximizing productivity of individual jobs
Proponents:
- systematic work (Fredrick W. Taylor)
- Henry Gantt (Gantt Chart)
- Frank B. Gilbreth (time and motion studies)
Bureaucracy Theory
- Organizing “Classical” Era (1910-1930)
- Macro Approach
- emphasis on structure and functions of management to optimize productivity of the organization
- Max Weber’s view of maturing organizations and its factors: employee competence, positional authority in formal structure, rules and procedures for efficiency of the structure
Henri Fayol
- Organizing “Classical” Era (1910-1930)
- created the 4 functions of management and other principles:
- unity of command: each employee reports to only one superior
- unity of direction: every manager & employee is guided by a single plan of action
- scalar chain: chain of authority dictating hierarchy of every employee
Mary Parker Follett
- Leading “Human” Era (1930-1950)
- “mother” of the leading era
- emphasized human/behavioral side of management:
- authority is in the workers whose knowledge and expertise makes them best serve the company
- managers facilitate instead of control
- psychology and sociology help managers see people as a collection of beliefs and emotions
Lilian Gilbreth
- Leading “Human” Era (1930-1950)
- focused on human resource mgm’t
- studied ways to reduce job stress
- advocated for standard work days, child-labor laws, protection of workers from unsafe working conditions
Chester Barnard
- Leading “Human” Era (1930-1950)
- leadership and the informal organization
- social groups form within the org.
- organizations should not be managed impersonally
- “zone of indifference” activities employees will not rebel against doing
Hawthorne Effect
- Leading “Human” Era (1930-1950)
- respect for workers leads to increased productivity
- relationships help understand behavior in organizations
- turning point in the evolution of management
Human Relations Movement
- Leading “Human” Era (1930-1950)
- actions to increase employee satisfaction to increase productivity
- Theory X & Y (Douglas McGregor 1906-1964)
- Theory X: people are lazy and prefer to be directed, design systems to ensure people will work hard
- Theory Y: people want to work and prefer control over their work, management should support people to excel at their own work
Management Science
- Planning “Calculating” Era (1950-1970)
- Operations research and management
- Systems Theory: considers the complexity of managing organizations between a closed and open system
Contingency View
- Planning “Controlling” Era (1950-1970)
- course of action is contingent upon the situation at hand
- Bounded Rationality (Herbert Simon): limited information limits management decision making
- Burns & Stalker: mechanistic structures in stable environments, organic structures in dynamic environments
- Strategic Choice Theory (John Child): key decisions of the leaders of the mgmt.
Institutionalization
- Controlling “Values & Beliefs” Era (1970-1990)
- “valued” rules established as norms or culture in an organization as a result of:
- dysfunctional social-cultural “scripts
- irrational social norms
- peer pressure
- simple inertia
Social Construction of Reality
- reality is a result of social interaction
- management roles create meaning for others through the way they interact with these roles