Helping Behaviour Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Bystander effect

A

more people present, less likely individuals are to help. If they do help, it’ll take them longer to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bystander effect: when we can see other’s responses (ex. Smoky Room study)

A

People conform to what they wrongly believe is others’ unconcerned reaction (pluralistic ignorance: people are all following a norm that nobody really believes in) - people tend to have blank faces in an emergency situation because they don’t know what to do, so when others look around to try and figure out what to do, they misinterpret blank faces as indication that it’s not an emergency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bystander effect: when we can’t see other’s responses (ex. Kitty Genovese murder)

A

Everyone assumes someone else will take care of it (diffusion of responsibility)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bystander intervention decision tree

A
  • 5 steps you have to go through in order to help:
    • Notice
    • Interpret as emergency
    • Assume responsibility
    • Know what to do
    • Decide to help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Decision tree: noticing need for help

A
  • If you’re rushed, you’re less likely to notice and less likely to help
  • ex. Good Samaritan study: students (half of whom asked to discuss parable of good Samaritan) need to walk to a building, experimenters manipulated how rushed they’d be, wanted to see if they’d notice/help someone slumped over in a doorway on their way
    • No rush: 60% helped; very rushed: 10% helped
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Decision tree: interpreting as emergency

A
  • More bystanders = pluralistic ignorance

- Ambiguity of situation (ex. Guy with a dog)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Decision tree: assume responsibility

A
  • More bystanders = diffusion of responsibility

- Ex. Drunk pedestrian on Sea to Sky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Decision tree: know what to do

A

expertise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

decision tree: decide to help

A

weigh costs (ex. fear of embarrassment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Individual differences in helping: gender

A
  • Men more likely to help in a single act of heroism in emergencies
  • Women are more likely to help in long-term nurturing situations (ie. Spending one hour a week helping Big Sisters)
  • Women receive more help (especially when dressed femininely)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Individual differences in helping: relationships

A
  • In exchange relationships (strangers, acquaintances), cost of helping & likelihood of payback are very important
  • In communal relationships (close others), costs & payback are unimportant, but need is critical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how to increase helping

A
  • positive models

- education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

positive models

A

Helpful models increase chances of helping if a similar opportunity presents itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

education

A
  • Beauman et al. Study:
  • Randomly assigned to lecture topic (either bystander intervention or unrelated topic)
  • Two weeks later in a “separate study”, they’re with a confederate in a different building and see student lying on the floor
  • People who heard bystander lecture are more likely to help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Latane and Darley emergency situation study: what did they do?

A

Undergraduates put in smoke-filling room either alone, with 2 nonreacting others, or in groups of 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Latane and Darley emergency situation study: what did they find?

A

Less likely to report smoke when with passive others (10%) or in groups of 3 (38%) than when alone (75%)

17
Q

Latane and Darley emergency situation study: why did they find what they did?

A

Likely due to way people interpreted ambiguous situation -> pluralistic ignorance

18
Q

Bryan and Test helping study: what did they do?

A
  • 3 experiments about influence of altruistic models on helping (tested “the model effect”)
  • flat tire, coins in the kettle
19
Q

Bryan and Test helping study: what did they find?

A
  • presence of helping model significantly increased helping behaviour (whether changing flat tire or donating)
  • helpful models can overcome diffusion of responsibility - lots of people were around, but people still felt responsibility to help