Attitudes Flashcards
1
Q
cognitive dissonance
A
- feeling of discomfort caused by holding two conflicting cognitions
- Motivates change in cognition or behaviour to reduce conflict
- Ex. You could start recycling (changing behaviour), or decide that it’s not that important (changing cognition)
- Some element of choice is necessary to create dissonance (importance of external justification) - ex. Lisa’s forced choice doesn’t create dissonance
2
Q
Festinger study: cognitive dissonance and lying
A
- publicly stating someone you don’t privately believe creates dissonance -> can be reduced by retracting statement or changing private opinion
- Study: Boring task, people were paid either $20 or $1 to lie to others and tell them it was exciting
- People in the $1 condition felt dissonance (they had less justification for lying), causing them to convince themselves it was a fun task
- People in the $20 condition did not feel dissonance because they had enough justification for lying
3
Q
Elaboration Likelihood Model
A
- 2 routes to change attitudes through persuasion: central route and peripheral route
4
Q
central route
A
compelling arguments about why a product, etc. is good
5
Q
peripheral route
A
focuses on communicator attributes (ex. Attractive, expert, famous, etc.) and surface attributes of message (lots of long arguments – ie. Like bs-ing your way through a paper and hoping to convince your teacher)
6
Q
central and peripheral routes: when is each one effective?
A
- Key: motivation and ability to pay attention
- Ability: level of distraction
- Motivation: level of personal relevance, knowledge, and accountability
- High motivation and ability = central route
- Low motivation and ability = peripheral route
7
Q
long-term consequences of 2 routes
A
- central route (vs. peripheral):
- more enduring
- more resistant to later influence
- more predictive of behaviour
8
Q
Festinger dissonance study: what did they find?
A
- cognitive dissonance plays a role in:
- making a decision
- lying
- temptation
9
Q
Festinger study: cognitive dissonance and making a decision
A
- Once someone makes a choice, the attractive features of the thing they did not choose (or the unattractive features of the thing they chose) produce dissonance
- To reduce dissonance, must persuade themselves that attractive features of rejected alternative aren’t attractive (or vice versa)
- Ex. teen girl record study – rated record they chose higher than other record on the re-rating than the pre-rating (to reduce dissonance)
10
Q
Festinger study: cognitive dissonance and temptation
A
- Wanting something you cannot have creates dissonance – ex. Attractive aspects of a fun activity are dissonant with the knowledge that you can’t engage in it
- Ex. Kid’s toy study: kids play with all toys, then told they can’t play with one -> kids threatened with mild punishment showed dissonance and reduction (weak external justification), as shown in comparison of pre- vs. Post-ratings of toys)