Health Flashcards
psychological adjustment
- Process of altering behaviour to reach harmonious relationship with the environment.
- Coping successfully with stress; maintaining emotional equilibrium
- often used as a way of referring to mental health and psychological well-being more generally
Health
- Complete state of well-being, encompassing:
- Physical well-being
- Mental well-being
- Emotional well-being
- Social well-being
- Cultural well-being
- Spiritual well-being
- Environmental well-being
Stress
- Arises when individuals perceive that they cannot adequately cope with the demands being made on them or with threats to their well-being
- the RESPONSE to situations (the situations themselves are “stressors”)
Transactional model of Stress (Lazarus)
- Stimulus ->
- Cognitive appraisal ->
- Primary appraisal (whether event is seen as threatening/demanding)
- Secondary appraisal (whether person believes they have resources to cope with the event)
- If seen as threat & no resources -> stress, otherwise no stress (cannot occur with just one or the other)
Coping
- Behavioural response of the individual (doesn’t have to be successful or adaptive)
- Technically, efforts to manage both internal and external demands of a situation; whether successful or not
- A dynamic process; comprises a series of transactions between the individual and the environment
- Adaptive coping strategies: problem-solving, positive reappraisal, support-seeking
- Maladaptive coping strategies: denial, avoidance, rumination
Models of personality-illness interaction
- interactional model
- transactional model
- health behaviour model
- predisposition model
- illness behaviour model
Personality-illness models: Interactional
- Personality influences a person’s ability to cope
- Personality moderates the relation between stress and illness (lessens or worsens)
- Objective events happen to a person, but personality determines the impact of those events on illness by affecting ability to cope
- Ex. Someone with Type A personality may be more predisposed to take less time off to recover from illness, making their illness worse
Personality-illness models: transactional
- Transactional -> people don’t just respond to events, they also create situations through their choices and actions
- Personality has 3 potential effects:
- Personality can influence coping
- Personality can influence how a person appraises events
- Personality can influence events themselves
- Ex. Someone with low agreeableness and high neuroticism will fight more often with others and then be more stressed after fights, reducing coping and increasing illness
Personality-illness models: health behaviour
- Personality affects the stress-illness link indirectly, through health promoting or health degrading behaviours
- Builds on interactional/transactional models with consideration of health behaviours
- Personality influences event, appraisal, coping, and health behaviour
- Ex. Someone low in conscientiousness might engage in more problematic behaviours to cope with an approaching deadline, making them more vulnerable to heart disease
Personality-illness models: predisposition
- Associations may exist between personality and illness because of a third variable that is causing them both -> 3rd variable is aka a “predisposition”
- Ex. Enhanced sympathetic reactivity may be the cause of both subsequent illness and behaviours and emotions that make up neuroticism
- Predisposition -> physiological responsiveness, which influences illness and personality (which correlate with each other)
- Ex. Someone with a dopamine receptor gene that results in needing more arousal might lead to both drug addiction and high novelty-seeking
Personality-illness models: illness behaviour
- A model of illness behaviour (not illness itself)
- Personality influences:
- The agree to which a person perceives and attends to bodily sensations
- The degree to which a person interprets and labels sensations as illness
- Both of these influence reporting of symptoms
- Ex. Someone with high neuroticism might perceive fatigue during flu season as the flu, which would make them more likely to engage in health behaviours or see a doctor
exposure (and Big 5)
- amount of stress reported; differences in stress exposure may be due to actual differences in experiences/situations or differences in how stress is perceived and/or reported
- Ex. Those high in neuroticism experience greater stress exposure; report more daily/life stress
- Ex. Those high in extraversion report more events in general; mixed findings on stress exposure
- Ex. Agreeableness: fewer stressful events; fewer negative interactions
- Ex. Conscientiousness: perceive less stress
- Ex. Openness: perceive fewer stressful events
Appraisal (and Big 5)
- tendency to appraise events as more or less threatening
- Ex. Those high in neuroticism appraise events as more threatening and demanding
- Ex. Those high in extraversion appraise events as less threatening and demanding
- Ex. Agreeableness: appraise many events as less threatening and demanding (b/c they’re so easy-going they end up in situations that end of being stressful)
- Ex. Conscientiousness: appraise events as less demanding
- Ex. Openness: appraise many events as less threatening; greater stress resilience (open even with negative events)
Reactivity (and Big 5)
- degree of physiological and psychological responsiveness
- Ex. Those high in neuroticism have greater stress reactivity; higher blood pressure reactivity; more negative emotions; greater interpersonal conflict
- Ex. Those high in extraversion have lower physiological stress reactivity; more positive emotions
- Ex. Agreeableness: Lower physiological stress reactivity in some studies; some studies suggest greater reactivity in certain settings
- Ex. conscientiousness: lower stress reactivity
- Ex. Openness: lower stress reactivity; lower blood pressure reactivity; more positive emotions
Coping (and Big 5)
- behaviours or responses to stress
- Ex. Those high in neuroticism perceive fewer coping resources available; often choose maladaptive coping strategies; cope less effectively
- Ex. Those high in extraversion perceive more interpersonal coping resources available; often cope more effectively, especially on an interpersonal level -> social connections help them out*
- Ex. Agreeableness: Less interpersonal conflict; employ more interpersonal and adaptive coping strategies; generally cope more effectively with stress.
- Ex. Conscientiousness: Employ more active coping strategies like problem-solving and planning; less likely to engage in avoidance
- Ex. Openness: More likely to employ positive reappraisal/positive reframing coping strategies
Health (and Big 5)
- health outcomes (i.e., disease and illness)
- Ex. Those high in neuroticism have links to heart disease; poorer health in general, despite more visits to the doctor; increased risk of mortality from variety of diseases; more anxiety about health
- Ex. Those high in extraversion have better health in general; lower risk of mortality; some links to negative health behaviours like smoking and drinking
- Ex. Agreeableness: More positive health perceptions; fewer visits to the doctor; fewer medical problems; better health in general
- Ex. Conscientiousness: Engage in better health behaviours; better health overall, despite more visits to the doctor; lower mortality risk
- Ex. Openness: More positive health perceptions; better health overall; may be protective against all-cause mortality
Health psychology
study of the relationship between the mind, body, and the way they respond to the environment to produce health outcomes
attributional style (and optimism vs. pessimism)
- way of explaining causes of bad events
- 3 dimensions: external vs. internal, unstable vs. stable, specific vs. global
- optimists: unstable, specific, external attributors (predicts good health and positive health behaviours)
- pessimists: stable, global, internal attributors (believing their behaviour can’t influence things that happen; have more accidental or violent deaths)
concepts related to optimism: dispositional optimism, self-efficacy, & perceptions of risk
- dispositional optimism: expectation that good events will be plentiful in the future and bad events will be rare
- self-efficacy: belief that one can do the actions necessary to achieve a desired outcome
- perceptions of risk: optimists believe they are less likely to experience negative events (however, most people underestimate this -> “optimistic bias”)
3 roles of positive emotions in coping with stress
- sustain coping efforts
- provide a break from stress
- give people opportunity to replenish depleted resources (ie. social relationships)
3 positive emotion coping strategies
- positive reappraisal: focusing on the good in what has happened (ie. feeling like it’ll make you stronger)
- problem-focused coping: using thoughts and behaviours to solve underlying causes of stress (ie. creating to-do lists)
- creating positive events: creating a positive time-out from stress (ie. stopping to reflect on something positive)
categories of coping
- problem-focused: efforts to deal with source of stress (ie. making pro/con list) - Lazarus
- emotion-focused: efforts to deal with emotional affects of stress (ie. engaging in denial to avoid anxiety) - Lazarus
- relationship-focused: maintaining social relationships during stressful events (ie. responding to your partner empathetically) - DeLongis
- can include maladaptive strategies like “interpersonal withdrawal”, which is more common amongst people high in neuroticism
emotional inhibition
- pushing back negative emotions so you can deal with other events; prefrontal cortex involved
- ie. ignoring feelings of doing poorly on exam for now so you can focus on studying for another exam
- can be beneficial in some contexts (ie. to not hurt someone’s feelings), but not if it becomes chronic -> suppression of emotion takes additional effort/SNS arousal and physiological costs (ie. suppression of immune system)
Disclosure
- telling someone a private aspect of yourself
- researchers suggest always keeping things to yourself is a source of stress that could eventually lead to disease or psychological distress
- by sharing secrets, no longer have to spend energy/effort holding them in -> relief
- sometimes just writing down your feelings is helpful, even if you never disclose them to someone directly
- by writing about/talking about events, it helps you re-frame them and better understand them