Groups and Leadership Flashcards

1
Q

What is a group

A

Two or more people who share a common definition and evaluation of themselves and behave in accordance with that evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Group Entitativity

A

The property of a group that makes it seem like a coherent, distinct and unitary entity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Common bond groups

A

Based on direct attatchment among members

–> personal goals are more salient - egocentric principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Common identity groups

A

based in direct attatchment to the group

–> group goals are more salient - altruistic principe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

aggregates

A

not all groups are groups - sometimes merely social aggregates (lowes entitativity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social facilitation theory

A

an improvement in the performance of well learned/easy tasks and a deterioration in the performance of poorly learned/hard tasks in the mere presence of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Drive Theory

A

the mere presence of the same species instinctively causes arousal that motivates performance of habitual behaviour patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluation Apprehension Model

A

The argument that the physical presence of members of the same species causes drive because people have learnt to be apprehensive about being evaluated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Distraction conflict theory

A

The presence of an audience creates conflict between attending to the task and attending to the audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Self awareness Theory

–> non drive theory

A

people focus their atttention on themselves as an object

–> they make comparisons between actual self and ideal self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self discrepancy theory

–> non drive theory

A

discrepancy between actual self and ideal self increases motivation and effort to bring the two in line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Self presentation

–> non drive theory

A

people focus on self presentation - the best possible presentation of themselves –> increases or decreases task performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Task Taxonomy

Ivan Steiner 1972,1976

A

Classification of group tasks

  1. Whether a division of labour is possible
  2. whether the is a predetermined standard to be met
  3. how an individual´s inputs can contribute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Social loafing

A

A reduction in individual effort when working on a collective task, compared with working either alone or coactively

  • -> effect of group size might be caused by social impact
  • -> the responsibility the expereimenter gives to the participants is more and more diffused when its more people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ringelmann effect

A

the individual effort on a task diminishes as group size increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Free rider effect

A

Taking advantage of a shared public resouce without contribution to its maintenance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When do we loaf

A
  1. Output equity - we believe others loaf so we try to maintain equity
  2. Evaluation apprehension - we loaf less when we feel evaluated, when we are anonymous we loaf
  3. Matching to standard - missing knowledge of the group´s standards produces loafing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Social compensation effect

A

Sometimes people work harder collectively then coactively, to compensate for anticipated loafing by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Group cohesiveness

A

The property of a group that actively binds people as group members to one another and to the group as a whole
Entails: - attatchment to the group
- mutual support
- uniformity of conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Group socialisation

A

Dynamic relationship between the group and its members that describes the passage of members through a group in terms of commitment and of changing roles

  1. Evaluation,
  2. Comittment,
  3. Role transition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Model of group socialisation

Moreland and Levine

A

Explains passage of individuals through groups over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Group norms

A

Attitudinal and behavioural uniformities that define group membership and differentiate between groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Ethnomethodology

A

The violation of hidden norms in order to reveal their presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Moral foundation theory

A

Disagreement between people on what is morally good rests on the fact that they prioritise different moral principles in their moral reasoning

25
Roles
Patterns of behaviour that distinguish between different activities within the group, and that interrelate to one another for the greater good of the group
26
Role identity theory
Roles can influence who we are, our identity, our concept of self - -> Social expectations about behaviour can create enduring, real identities for people - -> Correspondence bias - we have the tendency to attribut the roles internally to the role player --> therefore avoid lower status roles
27
Status
Consensual evaluation of the prestige of a role in a group or of the prestige of a group and its members as a whole
28
Expectation states theory/status characteristics theory
Theory of the emergency of roles as a consequence of people´s status-based expectations about others´ performance 1. specific status characteristics (e.g. ability) 2. diffuse status characteristics (maybe no relevance e.g. high social status) - -> also leadership theory Theory of influence in groups that attributes greater influence to those who possess both task-relevant characteristics and characteristics of high-status groups in society
29
Communication networks
set of rules governing the possibility or ease of communication between different roles in a group
30
Schism
The division of a group into subgroups, that differ in their attitudes, values or ideology
31
Subjective group dynamics (Marques, Abrams) --> Marginal members
Marginal members are either 1. anti-normative deiviant - towards an outgroup 2. pro-normative deviant - away from the outgroup
32
Uncertainty-identity theory | --> why do people joing groups
To obtain social identity and reduce uncertainty we join groups
33
Social ostracism
Exclusion from a group by common consent | --> can lead to fatal reaction like low self-esteem or aggression
34
Leadership
Getting group members to achieve the group´s goals
35
Great person theory
Perspective on leadership that attributes effective leadership to innate or acquired individual characteristics (personality)
36
Three leadeership styles
1. Autocratic leader - style based on giving orders to followers 2. Democratic leaders - style based on consultation and obtaining agreement and consent from followers 3. Laissez-faire leaders - style based on desinterest in followers
37
leader behaviour description questionnaire (LBDQ)
Scale devised by ohio state leadership researchers to measure leadership behaviour and distinguish between 1. Initiating structure --> task oriented 2. consideration --> relationship oriented --> most effective leaders score high on both of the scales
38
Contingency theories
Theories of leadership that consider the leadership effectiveness of particular behaviours or behavioural styles to be contingent on the nature of the leadership situation
39
Fiedler´s contingency theory
distinguishes between 1. task oriented leader - most effective when situational control high or low 2. relationship oriented leader - more effective when between the extremes
40
Normative decision theory | --> contingency theory
Contingency theory of leadership that focuses on the effectiveness of different leadership styles in group decision making context 3 strategies: 1. autocratic - leader makes decisions 2. consultative - consulting subordinates but leader makes the decision 3. group decision making - shared decision making process
41
Path goal theory | --> contingency theory
Contingency theory of leadership that can also be classified as a transactional theory - focuses on how structuring (task oriented) and consideration (relationship oriented) behaviours motivate followers
42
Transactional leadership
approach to leadership that focuses on the transsaction of resources between leader and followers
43
Idiosyncrasy credit | Hollander
Transactional theory, that followers reward leaders for achieving group goals by allowing them to be relatively idiosyncratic
44
Leader-member exchange theory
Theory of leadership in which effective leadership rests on the ability of the leader to develop good quality personalized exchange relationships with individual members
45
Transformational leadership
Approach to leadership that focuses on the way that leaders transform group goals and actions – mainly through the exercise of charisma
46
Leader categorization theory
We have a variety of schemas about how different types of leader behave in different leadership situations. When a leader is categorized as a particular type of leader, the schema fills in details about how that leader will behave
47
Social identiy theory of leadership
when group becomes a salient and important basis for self-conception and identity, group prototypicality becomes perhaps more important than leader schemas for selecting a leader
48
Social dilemma
Situation in which short-term personal gain is at odds with the long-term good of the group
49
Role conguity theory
Role congruity theory proposes that a group will be positively evaluated when its characteristics are recognized as aligning with that group's typical social roles Mainly applied to the gender gap in leadership – because social stereotypes of women are inconsistent with people’s schemas of effective leadership, women are evaluated as poor leaders
50
Brainstorming
Uninhibited generation of as many ideas as possible in a group, in order to enhance group creativity
51
Illusion of group effectivity
Experience-based belief that we produce more and better ideas in groups than alone
52
Groupthink
Mode of thinking in highly cohesive groups in which the desire to reach unanimous agreement overrides the motivation to adopt proper rational decision-making procedures
53
Group polarization
Tendency for group discussion to produce more extreme group decisions than the mean of members’ pre-discussion opinions, in the direction favored by the mean
54
The bandwagon effect
people in discussion may compete to appear to be stronger advocates of that position
55
Pluralistic ignorance
people sometimes behave publicly in ways that do not reflect what they actually think --> e.g. confroming to a norm because you think everyone thinks so but the others actually don´t either but act the same way as you do
56
Example: Evaluation apprehension model and distraction conflict theory --> bottle
people were supposed to rate a facial expression on a tv but at the same time squeez a bottle as firmly as possible - -> they were either watched closely or alone - -> they performed better when watched
57
Example Ringelmann effect | --> pulling a rope
- -> young men were supposed to pull on a rope either alone, or in groups of two, three or eight - -> the force exerted per person decreased as a function of group size
58
Example study Zimbardo: stanford prison experiment --> roles influence on behaviour
The studends complied to well with the roles they were assigned --> roles can influence our identity and concept of self
59
Transactive memory of groups
Group members have a shared memory for who within the group remembers what and is the expert on what --> they might remember things better together