Group And Team Dynamics Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Group definition

A

Groups are those social aggregates that involve mutual awareness and the potential for interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

mutual awareness

A

where individuals know about the activities of other group members and the overall progress of the group.

eg a football crowd is too large to be considered a group as mutual awareness is not possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stage of Formation of groups and sports teams

A
  1. Forming
  2. Storming
  3. Norming
  4. Performing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Forming

A

The familiarisation stage where group members get to know each other and their strengths and weaknesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Storming

A

Members question the group structure and compete for status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Norming

A

A need for common goals is recognised and members begin to work together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Performing

A

Each member is aware of their role within the team and feels they can contribute to the success of the team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

stages of Steiners model of group effectiveness

A

Actual productivity
Potential productivity
Faulty processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Actual productivity

A

the degree of success of a team’s performance at a given time during a game or event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Potential productivity

A

the full capabilities of the group when they are working together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Faulty processing

A

the factors that can go wrong in team performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

two categories of Faulty processes

A

1.Co-ordination losses: a breakdown in teamwork also known as the Ringelmann effect
2.Motivation losses due to social loafing: a withdrawal of effort by team members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ringlemann effect

A

is a faulty process due to a breakdown in teamwork, when the effectiveness of the team to operate as a group cannot be sustained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

causes of the Ringlemann effect

A

•Large group numbers
eg: a large team such as a Rugby Union team is more likely to have a breakdown in teamwork: the success of an attacking move may rely on several players coordinating the timing of their runs.
•Lack of timing
eg: a football player mistimes a run and is caught offside
•Lack of understanding of tactics
eg: a hockey defender may not understand the half press and so the opposition gain possession in front of goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strategies to reduce the impact of the Ringlemann effect:

A

•Allocate clear roles within the team
•Repetition / practice of set plays in training
•Prioritise effective communication of tactics to team members / select good communicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

social loafing

A

Social loafing is a withdrawal of effort caused by reduced motivation, leading an individual to coast for a period of play or even for a whole game

17
Q

causes of social loafing

A

•Lack of accountability
•Lack of self confidence; perceived or actual lack of ability; task too difficult
•The perception that others are not trying
•Individual efforts not valued
•’Off the pitch’ problems such as emotional or social issues
•Lack of identity or poorly defined team roles

18
Q

Strategies to reduce the impact of social loafing

A

•Give credit for personal success such as highlighting assists / tackle count
•Give encouragement; attribute success to effort (internal unstable reasons)
•Punish social loafing; select ‘team’ players who are less likely to social loaf