Generalization & Maintenance Flashcards
Behavior Trap
An interrelated community of contingencies
of reinforcement that can be especially powerful, producing substantial and long-lasting behavior changes.
Effective behavior traps share four essential features:
(a) They are “baited” with virtually irresistible reinforcers
that “lure” the student to the trap;
(b) only a low-effort response already in the student’s repertoire is necessary to enter the trap;
(c) once inside the trap, interrelated contingencies of reinforcement motivate the student to acquire, extend, and maintain targeted academic and/or social skills; and
(d) they can remain effective for a long time because students shows few, if
any, satiation effects.
Contrived Contingency
Any contingency of reinforcement (or punishment) designed and implemented by a behavior analyst or practitioner to achieve the acquisition, maintenance, and/or generalization of a targeted behavior change.
Contrived Mediating Stimulus
Any stimulus made functional for the target behavior in the instructional setting that later prompts or aids the learner in performing the target behavior in a generalization setting.
General Case Analysis
A systematic process for identifying and selecting teaching examples that represent the full range of stimulus variations and response requirements in the generalization setting(s).
Generalization Across Subjects
Changes in the behavior of people not directly treated by an intervention as a function of treatment contingencies applied to other people.
Generalization Probe
Any measurement of a learner’s performance of a target behavior in a setting and/or stimulus situation in which direct training has not been provided.
Generalization Setting
Any place or stimulus situation that differs in some meaningful way from the instructional setting and in which performance of the target behavior is desired.
Indiscriminable Contingency
A contingency that makes it difficult for the learner to discriminate whether the next response will produce reinforcement. Practitioners use indiscriminable contingencies in the form of intermittent schedules of reinforcement and delayed rewards to promote generalized behavior change.
Instructional Setting
The environment where instruction occurs; includes all aspects of the environment, planned and unplanned, that may influence the learner’s acquisition and generalization of the target behavior.
Lag Reinforcement Schedule
A schedule of reinforcement in
which reinforcement is contingent on a response being different in some specified way (e.g., different topography)
from the previous response (e.g., Lag 1) or a specified number of previous responses (e.g., Lag 2 or more).
Multiple Exemplar Training
Instruction that provides the learner with practice with a variety of stimulus conditions, response variations, and response topographies to ensure the acquisition of desired stimulus controls response forms; used to promote both setting/situation generalization and response generalization.
Naturally Existing Contingency
Any contingency of reinforcement (or punishment) that operates independent of the behavior analyst’s or practitioner’s efforts; includes socially mediated contingencies contrived by other people and already in effect in the relevant setting.
Programming Common Stimuli
A tactic for promoting setting/situation generalization by making the instructional setting similar to the generalization setting; the two-step process involves (1) identifying salient stimuli that characterize the generalization setting and (2) incorporating those stimuli into the instructional setting.
Response Generalization
The extent to which a learner emits untrained responses that are functionally equivalent to the trained target behavior.
Undesired response generalization occurs when any generalized response produces undesired outcomes
Setting/Situation Generalization
The extent to which a learner emits the target behavior in a setting or stimulus situation that is different from the instructional setting.
Can be undesirable: Overgeneralization & faulty stimulus control