functionalism and crime Flashcards
according to Durkheim what is a crime?
functional
inevitable
normal
why is crime inevitable?
- not everyone equally socialised into shared norms and values
- diversity leads to variations of norms and values decreasing value consensus
- as society becomes more law-abiding norms and values adapt and tighten things that weren’t a crime may become one (ex segregation)
-anomie therefore more likely in modern societies, where smaller more specialised groups exist
when do abnormal levels of crime occur?
when there is social upheaval and the power of collective conscience is weakened and a state of anomie develops as people look after their own interests
why is crime normal?
- communities with no crome could suggest oppression and people fearing the police or government. crime is needed for boundary maintenance and progressing society further
what is boundary maintenance? (Durkheim)
when crime unites members. condemning the wrongdoer and reinforcing their commitments to the shared norms and values
what is an example of boundary maintenance?
2011 London riots lead to communities coming together to clean up
how do courtrooms help in boundary maintenance?
by reaffirming the values of the law-abiding majority discouraging often from breaking rules
criticism of boundary maintenance
cohen- media plays the role of ‘dramatisation of evil’ in his view the media coverage of crime creates ‘folk devils’
what is adaptation and change? (Durkheim)
all change starts with a deviant act. individuals with new ideas cant are completely shifted by the weight of social control they need to be able to challenge existing norms and values to promote change where needed
why is too much crime a problem? (Durkheim)
too much crime threatened to tear apart society with chaos and anomie
why is too little crime a problem
signifies a repressive regime (north Korea)
example of adaptation and change
martin Luther king was arrested over 30 times for leading demonstrations over segregation. this lead to the 1964 civil rights act. and the 1965 voting rights act
criticism of adaption and change
doesnt consider negative impacts (ie on victims and families)
what is the safety valve? (davis)
deviance can act as a safety valve releasing stress in society, preventing greater disruption.
Davis uses the example of prostitution as it prevents the nuclear family breakdown as a prostitute affair is better than an emotional one
safety valve criticism
no justification for believing that it will prevent further disruption