Fagen et al - elephant learning Flashcards

1
Q

what is the psychology being investigated

A

1) Operant conditioning
-This is the idea that we learn from consequences of our actions

positive consequences strengthen the behaviour so the behaviour is more likely to be repeated

Punishing consequences weaken the behaviour hence it is less likely to be repeated

2) SPR (secondary positive reinforcement) training
this is when a secondary reinforcement e.g a sound marker is paired with a positive reinforcement e.g food to enable an animal to make a marker food association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain operant conditioning

A

-This is a theory of learning , it is the idea that we learn from consequences of our actions

rewarding consequences (behaviour that has good consequences) strengthen the behaviour hence it is likely to be repeated

Punishing consequences ( behaviour that has bad consequences) weaken the behaviour hence it is less likely to be repeated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the background

A

-> Diagnosis and treatment of animals is an important part of captive animal welfare

-> Fagen et al , used SPR training in elephants to reliably and voluntarily get them to engage in a trunk washing procedure

-> Samples are obtained using water/saline solution from the trunk to test for tb (tuberculosis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the aim

A

-To see whether free contant traditionally trained elephants can be trained to participate in a trunk wash by using SPR training.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the methodology

A

-Type of controlled observation
-(because the physical context of the elephant was changed to get them to trunk wash)

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the sample

A

-4 female juveniles (numbered 1-4)
- 1 female adult
-All housed at the same elephant stable in Nepal
- The juveniles were aged between 5-7 years
-The adult was estimated to be in her 50’s

  • The elephants spent most of the day grazing in the jungle under control of their mahouts
  • They spent the rest of the day leg chained to the stable , with a freedom to move 6-8 feet around the stable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the criteria for eligibility for the sample

A

-They could not be currently pregnant or looking after a calf
- They were docile
- Their mahouts (elephant handlers) were willing to take part in the study
- None of the elephants had previous experience of SPR training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the SPR technique used

A

-The primary reinforcer was chopped banana

-The secondary reinforcer was a short whistle blow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When was training conducted in the study by Fagen

A

-During 7:30 - 10:00 am ; morning sessions

  • During 4:00 - 7:00 pm ; afternoon sessions
    -no elephant went longer than 2 days without a training session
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did the elephants indicate their unwillingness to participate- right to withdraw

A

They would do this by walking to the other side of the stall or
turning away from the trainer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where were the mahouts during training in the study by Fagen

A

the mahouts were present at all sessions and stood at the periphery (edge) for the safety of the trainer but were instructed not to speak or signal the elephants in any way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the 3 techniques of SPR used in the study by Fagen

A

1) Capture technique
2) Lure technique
3) Shaping technique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe capture technique as an SPR technique in the study by Fagen

A

A spontaneous natural behavior is captured by marking and rewarding the behavior, until it becomes appropriate for collection of the sample for tb

Example;
capture the natural blow associated with breathing and shape it for more force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe lure technique as an SPR technique

A

-Here for non-natural behaviours the animal is initially drawn into a wanted body position , by a strategic placement of a reward

-This body position is rewarded and used as a starting point from which to work on a desired behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give an example of capture technique used in the study by Fagen et al

A

capture the natural blow associated with breathing and shape it for more force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Give an example of the lure technique used in the study by Fagen et al

A

To get the saline solution to the base of the trunk , banana pieces are held above the trainers head for the elephant to trunk up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe the shaping technique

A

This involves rewarding approximations closer to the target behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What were the 5 behavioural tasks

A

1) Trunk here
2) Trunk up
3) Bucket
4) Blow
5)Steady

20
Q

Explain “Trunk here” behavioural task used in Fagen et al

A

-The elephant gently places the end of her trunk in the trainers outstretched hand in preparation to allow the instillation of saline or water into her trunk

-The lure method was initially used to teach this with banana pieces placed on the outstretched palm of the trainer for the elephant to retrieve.

-The lure method was removed after a few repetitions

21
Q

Explain “Trunk up” behavioural task used in Fagen et al

A

-The elephant lifts her trunk upward to allow the saline or water to run down to the base of her trunk

-The elephants were trained for this task using lure and shaping techniques

-For the Lure technique the trainer initially lured the trunk up position by bringing banana pieces a few inches above the forehead , for the elephants to retrieve with their trunks

22
Q

Explain “Bucket” behavioural task used in Fagen et al

A

-The elephant places the distal end of her trunk in a bucket in preparation to blow

-The elephants were trained for this task with a lure where the banana pieces were placed in the bottom of the bucket

23
Q

Explain “Blow” behavioural task used in Fagen et al

A

-The elephant gives a strong exhale through her trunk to blow out the solution for sample collection

-The elephants are trained for this behaviour by capturing the natural exhale associated with breathing and shaping it for more force , in order to collect enough sample for testing.

24
Q

Explain “Steady” behavioural task used in Fagen et al

A
  • The elephant holds the position she was previously asked to do
  • The elephants were trained for this behaviour after they had learnt certain positions in which to apply the hold cue

-Shaping was used to increase the amount of time a position was held.

-Relaxation of the trainer out of the hand cue position , indicated the elephant could relax out of the hold as well and defined conclusion of the steady behaviour

25
How was the steady behaviour in Fagen et al reinforced
The steady behaviour was reinforced by repetitive marking of the hold with the primary reinforcer , delivered upon completion of the hold.
26
What happened once the elephant was skilled in the 5 basic tasks
The trainer progressed to create strings of behaviour through behavioural chaining
27
What is behavioural chaining in the study by Fagen et al
this is when separately acquired skills are performed in order, following the verbal cue
28
Why were three other tasks targeting trunk up and trunk down abandoned in the study by Fagen et al
-They were abandoned as they were not needed for performance of a trunk wash in this population
29
What were the verbal cues that were paired with the behaviour in the study by Fagen
-Monosyllabic distinctive words created to mean nothing in either English or Nepali to avoid any misconception on the mahouts part that the elephant could potentially learn the meaning (as researchers didn’t want the mahouts to think elephants understood human language)
30
Describe the desensitisation method in the study by Fagenet al
-The trainer introduced the use of a syringe in the trunk here position , this was done incrementally using a desensitisation method over a series of repetitions of the whole trunk wash sequence , the syringe was gradually brought closer to ; -the elephants trunk then touching the trunk then inserted then inserted with increasing amounts of fluid
31
How did the trainers in the study by Fagen reduce the likeliness that the elephants would drink the solution
The elephants were given water to drink at the beginning of each training session
32
What were the results in the study by Fagen (regarding the juvenile elephants)
-The 4 juvenile elephants successfully learned the trunk wash however the adult elephant did not
33
Why did the adult elephant in the study by Fagen not learn the trunk wash
1)the mahouts claimed that because of her age she had a visual impairment and trunk weakness 2)she had a foot abscess in one of her feet 3)She was distracted and impatient during the last week of the study because of a 2 month old calf in the next stall that kept on wandering into her stall distracting her
34
What were the results about elephant 2 and 4 in the study by Fagen
Elephants 2 and 4 never passed their steady test
35
What were the results in the study by Fagen regarding elephant 5
Elephant 5 did not pass her blowing to bucket , desensitisation to syringe or steady test
36
What were the results in the study by Fagen with data
the elephants gradually improved their performance over time the mean success rate went from 39% after ten sessions to 89.3% after 35 sessions
37
What were the conclusions in the study by Fagen
Juvenile traditionally trained elephants can be trained to participate in trunk wash using only SPR techniques moreover elephants voluntarily participate rendering the traditional punishment techniques of training
38
List 3 strengths of the study by Fagen
-It upheld the guidelines when using animals as ss -high internal validity -quantitative data
39
List 3 weaknesses of the study by Fagen
low in generalisability - small sample size low ecological validity low reliability
40
Useful applications to everyday life from the study by Fagen
SPR technique of training can be adopted to help vets obtain samples for testing of tb and other diseases this technique is more ethically acceptable as it does not use the traditional punishment techniques
41
Why is the study by fagen from the learning approach
it investigates how operant conditioning techniques of SPR such as Lure , shaping , capture can be used to train elephants to trunk wash in order to obtain samples for tb testing this is consistent with the assumption that operant conditioning can be used to explain changes in behaviour
42
Individual and situational explanations from the study by Fagen
Elephant 5 was unable to learn the trunk wash because of situational factors - her age Elephant 5 was unable to learn the trunk wash because of situational factors - the 2 month calf
43
Outline how ‘session times’ were measured in the study by Fagen
The assistant timed the session to the nearest minute; * It started from when the first cue was offered; * It ended after the elephant’s response to the last cue offered
44
What saline solution did the elephants start with
they started on 0.9 saline as the sample medium they were then transitioned to plain water for training purposes
45
Controls and standardization
- the eligibility criteria - the trainers were told not to speak or signal the elephants in any way during training sessions - the elephants were given drinking water before every session to prevent them from drinking the solution -they used monosyllabic words as verbal cues
46
Nature vs Nurture debate
nurture - the elephants were taught the trunk wash behaviour using SPR techniques this supports the nurture side nature - one elephant no. 5 was unable to learn the procedure because her age this supports the nature side