Existence of God - Based on Observation Flashcards
What is Aquinas’ Fifth of the Five Ways? (Summa Theologica)
- The Idea from Aristotle of the Final Cause, the purpose of things
- Version of a design argument - achieves its end through its design
- Nature is teleological and everything serves a purpose
- Aquinas is not concerned with how things fit together
- There is purpose in the universe, purpose comes directly from the will of god
Quote Aquinas in his Fifth Way
“natural objects, act for a purpose, and this is evident from their acting always - or nearly always” - Note even he says ‘nearly always’ showing perhaps even he struggled to find purpose in some things
What is Aquinas’ example of the archer?
- An archer (who gives the arrow purpose) guides its arrow (which has no purpose) to the target just how God guides everything to its end
What are some clear issues with Aquinas’ Fifth Way?
- Word ‘purpose’ implies a mental state - objects do not have a mental state
- Dock leaves found near stinging nettles - but why do nettles sting in the first place?
- Nettles could perhaps be used as medicine - but does not follow that purpose is in the nettles themselves
- We give things purpose
Who was William Paley and what was his design argument?
- An enlightenment thinker
- Noted the complexity of the human eye and its ability
- Suppose you stumbled across a rock, you could denominate it came from natural causes e.g wind, erosion etc
- Instead you stumbles across a watch, there would be no denomination of a natural cause for it, it is far too intricate with its cogs etc - there must have been a watch maker
- Applied to the universe to show its intricacy has a creator, in this case God
What are 3 vital comments made by Paley
1) Our inference would remain the same even if we hadn’t ever seen a watch, the watch is so obviously different from the rock it must’ve had a different type of origin
2) Even if the watch did not function perfectly as does the universe, there is enough evidence of design to deduce the watchmaker
3) Our inference would still be correct even if there were parts of the machine whose function we could not work out
What is Humes 1st Criticism of Paley’s design argument?
The Aptness of the Analogy:
- The comparing of the world to a machine shapes the argument already, machines have machine makers.
- Suppose the world was a cabbage, it’s leaves are intricate in design and it serves a purpose however we would not draw the conclusion of a cabbage maker
- By choosing a machine for the analogy, they have already got the result they want
What is Humes 2nd Criticism of Paley’s design argument?
The Epicurean Thesis:
- Finite particles in the universe moved around freely for infinite time, underwent every combination
- One of these combinations was relatively stable and fit well together, the one we live in - a universe with some apparent order
- Monkeys in a room full of typewriters with infinite time would eventually undergo every combination, the bible and Shakespeares works
What is Humes 3rd Criticism of Paley’s design argument?
Argument from Effect to Cause:
- Cannot go from an effect to a cause greater than that needed to produce the cause
- Set of scales, only see one pan but it is in the air and we know the other is heavier
- We don’t know whether it has feathers or an elephant in it to make it heavier
- The same way we cannot go from the world with all its limitations to God
- Perhaps this world is a discarded effort of an infant deity or work of a committee of gods
What was John Stuart Mill’s objection?
- Amount of evil in the world as an objection to design
- A flawed universe has a flawed creator
- Natural evil, e.g illness, plague, volcanoes, earthquakes etc
- Seem to be a part of the world structure, a good shipbuilder would not be good if his ships were leaky
Quote John Stuart Mill
“Not even the most distorted and contracted theory of good”
- In his Essays on Religion, Nature and the Utility of Religion
Quote Anthony Kenny on Paleys type of argument
“leads to a God which is no more the source of good than the source of evil”
Explain the theory of Evolution
- Origin of Species, 1859
- ‘Survival of the fittest’ - T.H Huxley
- Natural Selection
- Survival is a matter of pure chance, species depend on their ability to fit in and adapt to the world
Explain F.R Tennants modern design argument
- Developed the anthropic principle
- The world has created a precise environment for man, this must have been planned
What does F.R Tennant assume?
- That the entire universe exists for the sake of the earth, this is unlikely
- The universe is an amount of vast space with so many possible events
- Where does evidence for design exist in remote uninhabited and uninhabitable galaxies?