EXAM Q2 Pt2 Flashcards

1
Q

How to Write a REACTION PAPER

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

Step2: Limit the Quantity of the Words

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

Step 4: Analyze the Key Points

Step 5: Write a Good Concluding Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

try to catch every important idea and in order not to miss anything take notes scrupulously

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

while reading think about the author’s POV, his/her motives to think so

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

it will be useful to study the author’s biography before reading his book to be aware of his background

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

take notes attentively and write down every wise and disputable thought to analyze it further

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

a successful reaction paper is quite a short piece of writing

A

Step2: Limit the Quantity of the Words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

you are expected to focus on several points which you support or not

A

Step2: Limit the Quantity of the Words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

try to make your reaction paper strictly-structured: one paragraph for one idea and analyze it briefly

A

Step2: Limit the Quantity of the Words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

now it is time to start writing a reaction paper

A

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

first of all present a brief summary of the text under analysis and mention its title

A

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

describe the main idea of the text, the main problems and questions

A

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

analyzing the content start with the author’s POV, his attitude to the facts presented in his book or article

A

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

now, write the body of the reaction paper

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

you should demonstrate that you have understood the ideas of the author and the general problem of the text

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

choose several author and the general problem of the text

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

choose several essential points for analysis

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

you are free to agree or disagree with the author, but you must rely on the evidence from the text

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

in order to be logically, devote one paragraph for one point for discussion

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

express your attitude towards the text and its parts

A

Step5: Write a Good Concluding Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

summarize how your POV differs from the author’s and what ideas you share with him

A

Step5: Write a Good Concluding Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

proofread the paper several times to avoid mistakes and finally check if you have chosen the proper citation style

A

Step5: Write a Good Concluding Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

are specialized forms of writing in which a reviewer or reader evaluates

A

REACTION PAPER, A REVIEW, and a CRITIQUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

REACTION PAPER, A REVIEW, and a CRITIQUE are specialized forms of writing in which a reviewer or reader evaluates any of the following:

A
  1. Scholarly Work
  2. A Work of Art
  3. Designs
  4. Graphics Designs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

They usually range in length from (how many) words

A

250 to 750

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

they are NOT SIMPLY SUMMARIES but are critical assessments, analyses, or evaluations of different works

A

REACTION PAPER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

do not rely on merely on opinions; rather they use both proof and logical reasoning to substantiate their comments

A

REVIEWERS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

they process ideas in a specific field of study, and present an analytical response to a scholarly, literary, or artistic work

A

REVIEWERS

28
Q

Critical Approaches in Writing a Critique

A
  1. Formalist Criticism or Formalism
  2. Feminist Criticism or Feminism
  3. Reader Response Criticism
  4. Marxist Criticism
29
Q

claims that literary works contain intrinsic properties and treat each work as distinct work of art

A

FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM

30
Q

it posits that the key to understanding a text is through the text itself

A

FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM

31
Q

the historical context, the author, or any other external context are not necessary in interpreting the meaning

A

FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM

32
Q

someone who uses formalist criticism looks into the aspects

A

FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM

33
Q

FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM looks into the following aspects:

A

Author’s techniques in resolving contradictions within the work

Central passage that sums up the entirety of the work

Contribution of parts and the work as a whole to its aesthetic quality

Relationship of the form and the content

Use of imagery to develop the symbols used in the work

Interconnectedness of various parts of the work

Paradox, ambiguity, and irony of the work

Unity of the work

34
Q

Sample formalist critique of “Dead Stars,” a classic Filipino short story by

A

Paz Marques Benitez

35
Q

focuses on how literature presents women as subjects of socio-political, psychological, and economic oppression

A

FEMINIST CRITICISM OR FEMINISM

36
Q

it also reveals how aspects of our culture are patriarchal, i.e., how our culture views men as superior and women as inferior

A

FEMINIST CRITICISM OR FEMINISM

37
Q

Someone who uses feminist criticism looks into the following aspects:

A

How culture determines gender

How gender equality (or the lack of it) is presented in the text

How gender issues are presented in literary works and other aspects of human
production and daily life

How women are socially, politically, psychologically, and economically
oppressed by patriarchy

How patriarchal ideology is an overpowering presence

38
Q

concerned with the reviewer’s reaction as an audience of a work

A

READER RESPONSE CRITICISM

39
Q

this approach claims that the reader’s role cannot be separated from the understanding of the work

A

READER RESPONSE CRITICISM

40
Q

a text does not have meaning until the reader reads it and interprets it

A

READER RESPONSE CRITICISM

41
Q

readers are therefore not passive and distant, but are active consumers of the materials presented to them

A

READER RESPONSE CRITICISM

42
Q

Someone who uses Reader Response criticism looks
into the following aspects:

A

Interaction between the reader and the text in creating
meaning

The impact of reader’s delivery of sounds and visuals
on enhancing and changing meaning

43
Q

Concerned with differences between economic classes and implications of a capitalist system, such as the continuing conflicts between the working class and the elite

A

MARXIST CRITICISM

44
Q

it attempts to reveal that the ultimate source of people’s experience is the socioeconomic system.

A

MARXIST CRITICISM

45
Q

Someone who uses Marxist criticism looks into the
following aspects:

A

Social class as represented in the work

Social class of the writer/ creator

Social class of the characters

Conflicts and interactions between economic classes

46
Q

Two characters/ Women in Dead Stars

A

Esperanza
Julia Salas

47
Q

Structure of a Reaction Paper, a Review, and a Critique (Scholarly Books and Articles)

A

Introduction (5% of the paper)

Summary (10% of the paper)

Review/Critique (75% of the paper)

Conclusion (10% of the paper)

48
Q

title of the book/article/ work

A

INTRODUCTION

49
Q

writer’s name

A

INTRODUCTION

50
Q

thesis statement

A

INTRODUCTION

51
Q

objective or purposes

A

SUMMARY

52
Q

methods used (if applicable)

A

SUMMARY

53
Q

major findings, claims, ideas, or messages

A

SUMMARY

54
Q

overall impression of the work

A

CONCLUSION

55
Q

scholarly or literary value of the review article, book, or work

A

CONCLUSION

56
Q

benefits for the intended audience or field

A

CONCLUSION

57
Q

suggestion for future direction or research

A

CONCLUSION

58
Q

Structure of a Reaction Paper, a Review, and a Critique (Other types of Review)

A

INTRODUCTION

PLOT SUMMARY/ DESCRIPTION

ANALYSIS/ INTERPRETATION

CONCLUSION/ EVALUATION

59
Q

basic details about the material such as its title, director or artist, name of exhibition/ event, and the like

A

INTRODUCTION

60
Q

main assessment of the material

A

INTRODUCTION

61
Q

gist of the plot

A

PLOT SUMMARY/ DESCRIPTION

62
Q

simple description of the artwork

A

PLOT SUMMARY/ DESCRIPTION

63
Q

reinforcement of main assessment

A

CONCLUSION/ EVALUATION

64
Q

comparison to a similar work

A

CONCUSION/ EVALUATION

65
Q

recommendation of the material (if you liked it)

A

CONCLUSION/ EVALUATION

66
Q

levels of PLAGIARISM

A
  1. MILD
  2. MODERATE
  3. SEVERE