EXAM Q2 Pt2 Flashcards

1
Q

How to Write a REACTION PAPER

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

Step2: Limit the Quantity of the Words

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

Step 4: Analyze the Key Points

Step 5: Write a Good Concluding Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

try to catch every important idea and in order not to miss anything take notes scrupulously

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

while reading think about the author’s POV, his/her motives to think so

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

it will be useful to study the author’s biography before reading his book to be aware of his background

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

take notes attentively and write down every wise and disputable thought to analyze it further

A

Step1: Read Attentively and Take Notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

a successful reaction paper is quite a short piece of writing

A

Step2: Limit the Quantity of the Words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

you are expected to focus on several points which you support or not

A

Step2: Limit the Quantity of the Words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

try to make your reaction paper strictly-structured: one paragraph for one idea and analyze it briefly

A

Step2: Limit the Quantity of the Words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

now it is time to start writing a reaction paper

A

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

first of all present a brief summary of the text under analysis and mention its title

A

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

describe the main idea of the text, the main problems and questions

A

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

analyzing the content start with the author’s POV, his attitude to the facts presented in his book or article

A

Step3: Write a Summary of the Text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

now, write the body of the reaction paper

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

you should demonstrate that you have understood the ideas of the author and the general problem of the text

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

choose several author and the general problem of the text

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

choose several essential points for analysis

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

you are free to agree or disagree with the author, but you must rely on the evidence from the text

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

in order to be logically, devote one paragraph for one point for discussion

A

Step4: Analyze the Key Points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

express your attitude towards the text and its parts

A

Step5: Write a Good Concluding Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

summarize how your POV differs from the author’s and what ideas you share with him

A

Step5: Write a Good Concluding Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

proofread the paper several times to avoid mistakes and finally check if you have chosen the proper citation style

A

Step5: Write a Good Concluding Part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

are specialized forms of writing in which a reviewer or reader evaluates

A

REACTION PAPER, A REVIEW, and a CRITIQUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

REACTION PAPER, A REVIEW, and a CRITIQUE are specialized forms of writing in which a reviewer or reader evaluates any of the following:

A
  1. Scholarly Work
  2. A Work of Art
  3. Designs
  4. Graphics Designs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

They usually range in length from (how many) words

A

250 to 750

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
they are NOT SIMPLY SUMMARIES but are critical assessments, analyses, or evaluations of different works
REACTION PAPER
26
do not rely on merely on opinions; rather they use both proof and logical reasoning to substantiate their comments
REVIEWERS
27
they process ideas in a specific field of study, and present an analytical response to a scholarly, literary, or artistic work
REVIEWERS
28
Critical Approaches in Writing a Critique
1. Formalist Criticism or Formalism 2. Feminist Criticism or Feminism 3. Reader Response Criticism 4. Marxist Criticism
29
claims that literary works contain intrinsic properties and treat each work as distinct work of art
FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM
30
it posits that the key to understanding a text is through the text itself
FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM
31
the historical context, the author, or any other external context are not necessary in interpreting the meaning
FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM
32
someone who uses formalist criticism looks into the aspects
FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM
33
FORMALIST CRITICISM OR FORMALISM looks into the following aspects:
Author’s techniques in resolving contradictions within the work Central passage that sums up the entirety of the work Contribution of parts and the work as a whole to its aesthetic quality Relationship of the form and the content Use of imagery to develop the symbols used in the work Interconnectedness of various parts of the work Paradox, ambiguity, and irony of the work Unity of the work
34
Sample formalist critique of "Dead Stars," a classic Filipino short story by
Paz Marques Benitez
35
focuses on how literature presents women as subjects of socio-political, psychological, and economic oppression
FEMINIST CRITICISM OR FEMINISM
36
it also reveals how aspects of our culture are patriarchal, i.e., how our culture views men as superior and women as inferior
FEMINIST CRITICISM OR FEMINISM
37
Someone who uses feminist criticism looks into the following aspects:
How culture determines gender How gender equality (or the lack of it) is presented in the text How gender issues are presented in literary works and other aspects of human production and daily life How women are socially, politically, psychologically, and economically oppressed by patriarchy How patriarchal ideology is an overpowering presence
38
concerned with the reviewer's reaction as an audience of a work
READER RESPONSE CRITICISM
39
this approach claims that the reader's role cannot be separated from the understanding of the work
READER RESPONSE CRITICISM
40
a text does not have meaning until the reader reads it and interprets it
READER RESPONSE CRITICISM
41
readers are therefore not passive and distant, but are active consumers of the materials presented to them
READER RESPONSE CRITICISM
42
Someone who uses Reader Response criticism looks into the following aspects:
Interaction between the reader and the text in creating meaning The impact of reader’s delivery of sounds and visuals on enhancing and changing meaning
43
Concerned with differences between economic classes and implications of a capitalist system, such as the continuing conflicts between the working class and the elite
MARXIST CRITICISM
44
it attempts to reveal that the ultimate source of people’s experience is the socioeconomic system.
MARXIST CRITICISM
45
Someone who uses Marxist criticism looks into the following aspects:
Social class as represented in the work Social class of the writer/ creator Social class of the characters Conflicts and interactions between economic classes
46
Two characters/ Women in Dead Stars
Esperanza Julia Salas
47
Structure of a Reaction Paper, a Review, and a Critique (Scholarly Books and Articles)
Introduction (5% of the paper) Summary (10% of the paper) Review/Critique (75% of the paper) Conclusion (10% of the paper)
48
title of the book/article/ work
INTRODUCTION
49
writer's name
INTRODUCTION
50
thesis statement
INTRODUCTION
51
objective or purposes
SUMMARY
52
methods used (if applicable)
SUMMARY
53
major findings, claims, ideas, or messages
SUMMARY
54
overall impression of the work
CONCLUSION
55
scholarly or literary value of the review article, book, or work
CONCLUSION
56
benefits for the intended audience or field
CONCLUSION
57
suggestion for future direction or research
CONCLUSION
58
Structure of a Reaction Paper, a Review, and a Critique (Other types of Review)
INTRODUCTION PLOT SUMMARY/ DESCRIPTION ANALYSIS/ INTERPRETATION CONCLUSION/ EVALUATION
59
basic details about the material such as its title, director or artist, name of exhibition/ event, and the like
INTRODUCTION
60
main assessment of the material
INTRODUCTION
61
gist of the plot
PLOT SUMMARY/ DESCRIPTION
62
simple description of the artwork
PLOT SUMMARY/ DESCRIPTION
63
reinforcement of main assessment
CONCLUSION/ EVALUATION
64
comparison to a similar work
CONCUSION/ EVALUATION
65
recommendation of the material (if you liked it)
CONCLUSION/ EVALUATION
66
levels of PLAGIARISM
1. MILD 2. MODERATE 3. SEVERE