Exam 2: Group Flashcards
Group
- 2 or more people who influence each other
- Influence can be direct (interaction, social group) or indirect (mere presence, non-social group)
Benefits (Group)
- Access to interaction
- Emotional support
- Identity
- Social norms (informational influence)
Direct Influence (Group)
- Compliance
- Obedience
- Group polarization
- Groupthink
Indirect Influence (Group)
- Conformity (perceived presence to change behavior)
- Social facilitation
- Social loafing
- Deindividuation
Social Facilitation (Groups Good or Bad?)
- Influence other people have on performance by mere presence
- People perform better in the presence of others (facilitation)
- People perform worse in the presence of others (inhibition)
What determines improvement or deterioration? (Social Facilitation, Groups Good or Bad?)
- Competition
- Nature of task
a. Simple (facilitation)
b. Complex (inhibition) - Presence of others increases arousal which increases dominant response (already aroused/nervous or not?)
Yerkes-Dodson Law (Social Facilitation, Groups Good or Bad?)
- Presence of others increases arousal
- Arousal has curvilinear relationship with performance
- Upside down U from “low” to “high” with 2 tangent lines on each side
Why?
- Makes us alert and observant
- Evaluation apprehension: predicts that when we work in groups, our concern of what they’ll think influences our decisions
- Distracting
Social Loafing (Groups Good or Bad?)
- Tendency to exert less effort as members of a group than when alone
- Works only when contribution is unknown/unnoticeable
Why Social Loaf?
a. Relaxation: because you’re not observed
- Simple tasks = more loafing
- Complex tasks = less loafing
b. Diffusion of responsibility: not held accountable
- Disappears when contributions are identifiable
- Less likely to occur if goal is highly valued
Deindividuation (Groups Good or Bad?)
- When personal identity is replaced by group identity
- Concerned with goals/actions of group
- Feeling of anonymity
- Loss of social constraints of behavior
- Loss of self-awareness (we forget what we would do as individuals)
Result?
- Feel less accountable for behavior
- Won’t be blamed
- Groups norm replaces personal norms
- Implications for online behavior (say or do things we wouldn’t do in person)
- Anti-social behaviors (actions that harm or lack consideration for the well-being of others)
- Prosocial only if the group is prosocial (actions that help the well-being of others)
Group Polarization (Groups Good or Bad?)
- When group decisions/agreements are more extreme than that of an individual’s
- “Risky” vs. “conservative”
Why?
a. Informational influence (people assume the actions of others in an attempt to reflect correct behavior in a given situation)
- Want to appear right
- Majority of arguments will support initial position
- Lead to additional initial position arguments
b. Normative influence (effect of other people that leads us to conform in order to be liked and accepted)
- Social comparison
- Desire to appear confident & “one-up” the other
c. Verbal statements increase commitment to argument