Exam 1 - Aphasia Frameworks Flashcards

1
Q

unidimensional frameworks of aphasia

A

all of language is seen as one inseparable whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

multidimensional frameworks of aphasia

A

the view that there are varied forms or syndromes of aphasia, each syndrome corresponding to a site of the lesion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

medical frameworks of aphasia

A

incorporate multidimensional views and this may be considered a subset of that category of viewpoints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cognitive neuropsychological frameworks of aphasia

A

based on models of mental representation and types and stages of information processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

biopsychosocial frameworks of aphasia related to the WHO ICF

A

highlights attention to the complex interaction of multiple factors that constitute “disabilities” and affect health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

social frameworks of aphasia

A

focused on the interpersonal contexts of communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

every level of language, from phonology to morphology to syntax to semantics to pragmatics, is included in one cohesive ability or set of abilities

A

unidimensional frameworks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

production and comprehension are not seen as independent components

A

unidimensional frameworks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MTDDA based on which framework?

A

unidimensional framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

helps us to consider each individual with aphasia as having a unique set of challenges requiring individualized assessment that leads to the design of an individually tailored treatment program

A

unidimensional framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

classifications of fluent vs nonfluent, anterior vs posterior

A

multidimensional framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

classic classification systems suggesting specific aphasia syndromes

A

multidimensional framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strength: recognizes well-established patterns of brain-behavior relationships, which may help us predict particular difficulties w/ language as well as concomitant problems that may affect a person’s communication abilities

A

multidimensional framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

considering the corresponding structural changes in the brain may help us to think critically about why a person is having a particular linguistic problem

A

multidimensional framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

aphasia is considered primarily at the medical level, at the level of specific linguistic deficits

A

medical framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

focus on analyzing the cause in terms of a disease state or change in body structure

A

medical framework

17
Q

operating from this perspective may be consistent with the viewpoints of other rehab team members and this help an SLP feel more easily understood when communication with others about assessment and plan of care

A

medical framework

18
Q

weakness: tends to focus on weaknesses, not strengths, and on attempting to “fix” problems at the expense of helping people compensate for and cope with challenges they will likely continue to have lng after they are discharged

A

medical framework

19
Q

focused on the processing of linguistic information in particular, subset of cognitive neuropsychological framework

A

psycholinguistic framework

20
Q

PALPA

A

psycholinguistic theory

21
Q

models of neuroanatomical structures and functions

A

connectionist models

22
Q

limitation: the components said to be responsible for any particular processing stage cannot capture the complexity of what must really happen in the brain to achieve whatever processing is intended to be captured at that stage

A

neuropsychological frameworks

23
Q

based on models of mental representation and types and stages of information processing; aphasia may be seen as a disruption of processing required for any linguistic task or set of tasks

A

cognitive neuropsychological framework

24
Q

consider complex relationship among genetics and other risk factors, etiologies, impaired structures and functions, environmental factors, social support, and a person’s desire for active engagement in varied life contexts

A

biopsychosocial framework

25
Q

WHO ICF fits this framework

A

biopsychosocial framework

26
Q

aphasia is seen as a social condition

A

social framework

27
Q

a problem with communication is considered a problem because the person with aphasia and/or the people in their social environment consider it to be a problem

A

social frameworks

28
Q

considered subset of biopsychosocial frameworks

A

social frameworks

29
Q

strength: heightened awareness they bring to the reason we do the work that we do: to improve people’s lives in meaningful ways through improved communication and socialization in ways that they think are important

A

social frameworks

30
Q

the severity of aphasia has to do with the severity of its impact on a person’s well-being

A

social framework

31
Q

strength: take into account the ongoing usually lifelong, consequences of aphasia

A

social framework

32
Q

limitation: approaches to assessment and treatment are not easily encapsulated or described

A

social framework