EU LAW & history Flashcards

1
Q

Dates and place:
- Treaty establishing Western European Union
- NATO
- Treaty for Council of Europe
- OEEC establihsment
- ECHR treaty
- Treaty ECSC in force (signing)
- Messina Conference to prepare for EEC Treaty
- Entry in force Treaty of Rome (signing)
- Establishment EFTA and member countries
- Convention OECD in Paris

A
  • Treaty establishing Western European Union: 1948 in BX
  • NATO: 1949 in Washington
  • Treaty for Council of Europe: 1949 in Strasbourg
  • OEEC establihsment: 1949 in Paris
  • ECHR treaty: 1950 in Rome
  • Treaty ECSC in force (signing): 1952 (1951 in Paris)
  • Messina Conference to prepare for EEC Treaty: 1955
  • Entry in force Treaty of Rome (signing): 1958 (1957)
  • Establishment EFTA and member countries: 1960 in Stockholm. Countries were Austria, Denmark,
    Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom
  • Convention OECD: 1960 in Paris
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dates and place:
- Signing of the Treaty establishing a single Council and single Commission of the European Communities (Merger Treaty):
- Entry in force Merger Treaty:
- DK, IE, UK join EC:
- Signing of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe:
- Establishment of the European Monetary System:
- First direct election of the European Parliament
- GR accession:
- withdrawal of Greenland from EEC:
- Schengen agreement and members:
- PL ES accession:
- Single European Act:

A

Dates and place:
- Signing of the Treaty establishing a single Council and single Commission of the European Communities (Merger Treaty): 1965
- Entry in force Merger Treaty: 1967
- DK, IE, UK join EC: 1973
- Signing of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe: 1975
- Establishment of the European Monetary System: 1978
- First direct election of the European Parliament: 1979
- GR accession: GR
- withdrawal of Greenland from EEC: 1985
- Schengen agreement and members: 1985 between BE, FR, DE, LUX, NL
- PL ES accession: 1986
- Single European Act: 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dates and place:
- Maastricht Treaty signing:
- EEA agreement signing:
- Inception of European single market:
- Maastricht entry into force:
- Entry into force of the EEA Agreement:
- Accession AT, FI, SW:
- Entry into force of the Schengen Convention + additional members
- Publication of the European Commission’s Agenda 2000 programme aimed at enlarging the EU:
- Signing Amsterdam Treaty (entry in force):
- Start of EU enlargement process of European Council in LUX
- Entry into force of Europol convention:
- Adoption of the Lisbon strategy for the economic, social and environmental renewal of the EU:
- Proclamation charter of Fundamental rights Europe:
- Treaty of Nice signing:

A
  • Maastricht Treaty signing: 1992 (1993 entry in force)
  • EEA agreement signing: 1992 in Porto
  • Inception of European single market: 1993
  • Maastricht entry into force: 1993
  • Entry into force of the EEA Agreement: 1994
  • Accession AT, FI, SW: 1995
  • Entry into force of the Schengen Convention + additional members: 1995, Denmark, Greece, Spain, Italy, Austria,
    Portugal, Finland and Sweden
  • Publication of the European Commission’s Agenda 2000 programme aimed at enlarging the EU: 1997
  • Signing Amsterdam Treaty (entry in force): 1997 (1999)
  • Start of EU enlargement process of European Council in LUX: 1997
  • Entry into force of Europol convention: 1998
  • Adoption of the Lisbon strategy for the economic, social and environmental renewal of the EU: 2000
  • Proclamation charter of Fundamental rights Europe: 2000
  • Treaty of Nice signing: 2001
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dates and place:
- Establishment of Eurojust:
- Entry in force Nice treaty:
- Accession big:
- Signing of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
- Rejection of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe in referenda in France (54.7 % vote no) and the Netherlands (61.7 % vote no):
- BG RO accession:
- introduction euro in slovenia:
- Establishment of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights:
- Solemn proclamation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by the European Parliament, the Council of the European
Union and the European Commission:

A

Dates and place:
- Establishment of Eurojust: 2002
- Entry in force Nice treaty: 2003
- Accession big: 2004
- Signing of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe: 2004
- Rejection of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe in referenda in France (54.7 % vote no) and the Netherlands (61.7 % vote no): 2005
- BG RO accession: 2007
- introduction euro in slovenia: 2007
- Establishment of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights: 2007
- Solemn proclamation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by the European Parliament, the Council of the European
Union and the European Commission: 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dates and place:
- Treaty of Lisbon signing (in force):
- Entry of CZ, EE, LV, LT, HU, MT, PL, SL, SK in Schengen:
- Introduction euro in Malta and Cyprus
- First referendum in Ireland on the Treaty of Lisbon (53.4 % vote no):
- Entry of Switzerland to the Schengen Area:
- Introduction euro in SK:
- Second referendum in Ireland on the Treaty of Lisbon (67.1 % vote yes)
- Creation of the European External Action Service
- Introduction euro Estonia
- Launch of ESMA:
- Adoption of the Euro Plus Pact for economic policy coordination in the economic and monetary union
- Entry of Liechtenstein to the Schengen Area:

A
  • Treaty of Lisbon signing (in force): 2007 (2009)
  • Entry of CZ, EE, LV, LT, HU, MT, PL, SL, SK in Schengen: (2007)
  • Introduction euro in Malta and Cyprus: 1. Januar 2008
  • First referendum in Ireland on the Treaty of Lisbon (53.4 % vote no): 2008
  • Entry of Switzerland to the Schengen Area: 2008
  • Introduction euro in SK: 2009
  • Second referendum in Ireland on the Treaty of Lisbon (67.1 % vote yes: 2009
  • Creation of the European External Action Service: 2010
  • Introduction euro Estonia: 2011
  • Launch of ESMA: 2011
  • Adoption of the Euro Plus Pact for economic policy coordination in the economic and monetary union: 2011
  • Entry of Liechtenstein to the Schengen Area: 2011
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Dates and place
- Agreement by 25 Member States of a Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in
the economic and monetary union (Fiscal Compact)
- Signing of the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism
- Accession Croatia:
- Introduction euro in Latvia:
- Introduction euro Lithuania:
- Formal withdrawal of Iceland’s application for EU membership
- Paris Agreement entry in force
- Formal notice by Prime Minister Theresa May of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the EU
- Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU after 47 years of membership
- The United Kingdom withdraws from the EU’s internal market and customs union and from all EU policies and trade agreements
- COFE joint signature:
- EU adopts climate law
- Introduction of euro in Croatia (20th member)
- Entry Croatia Schengen:

A
  • Agreement by 25 Member States of a Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in
    the economic and monetary union (Fiscal Compact): 2012
  • Signing of the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism: 2012
  • Accession Croatia: 2013
  • Introduction euro in Latvia: 2014
  • Introduction euro Lithuania: 2015
  • Formal withdrawal of Iceland’s application for EU membership: 2015
  • Paris Agreement entry in force: 2016
  • Formal notice by Prime Minister Theresa May of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the EU: 2017
  • Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU after 47 years of membership: 2020
  • The United Kingdom withdraws from the EU’s internal market and customs union and from all EU policies and trade agreements: 2021
  • COFE joint signature: 2021
  • EU adopts climate law: 2021
  • Introduction of euro in Croatia (20th member): 2021
  • Entry Croatia Schengen: 2023
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

NATO Member States:

A
  • total is 31
  • 22 EU Members (excluding Ireland, Cyprus, Malta, Austria)
  • Albania, Canada, Iceland, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Norway, Türkiye, the United Kingdom and the United States
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Foundation WEU and dissolution

A

1954, dissolved 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Foundation OSCE, and important milestones, role

A
  • 1994
  • successor to the 1975 Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe
  • Basic accords are the 1975 Helsinki Final Act and 1990 Charter of Paris
  • early warning, conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict rehabilitation. Its mandate includes issues such as arms control, the promotion of human rights, freedom of the press, and free and fair elections. It
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Beneš decrees

A

1945, disallowed claims to land in areas of
Czechia that were formerly German, its keeping was key demand from CZ PResident during Treaty of Lisbon Negotiations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

TEU 6 titles

A

(I) Common provisions,
(II) Provisions on democratic
principles,
(III) Provisions on the institutions, (IV) Provisions on enhanced
cooperation,
(V) General provisions on the Union’s external action and
specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy and
(VI) Final provisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

TFEU - origin and changes

A

The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) was developed from the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty).

It has more or less the same structure as that treaty.

The main changes concern the external action of the EU and the introduction of new chapters, in particular on energy policy, police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, astronautics, and sport and tourism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Accession procedure

A
  1. a country is offered the prospect of membership;
  2. a country receives official candidate status once it has met the
    conditions for accession, but this does not necessarily mean that formal
    negotiations have been opened;
  3. formal accession negotiations are entered into with the candidate country, in which the arrangements and procedures for adopting the applicable EU legislation are agreed.
  4. When the negotiations and accompanying reforms have been completed to the satisfaction of both sides, the findings and the conditions for accession are laid down in an accession treaty
  5. First of all, the European Parliament
    must give its assent to this accession treaty by an absolute majority of its members. The Council must then give its – unanimous – approval.
  6. Following this, the accession treaty must be signed by the EU Heads of State or Government and the accession country
  7. The accession treaty must then be ratified by the EU Member States and the accession country according to the respective constitutional provisions. With the deposit of the instruments of ratification, the accession process is completed and the accession treaty enters into force. The accession country then becomes a Member State.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Acession criteria - establishment and details

A
  • established by the Copenhagen European
    Council in 1993

■ Political criteria. Stability of institutions, democracy, the rule of law,
guarantee of human rights and respect for and protection of minorities.

■ Economic criteria. The existence of a functioning market economy that
can cope with competitive pressure and market forces in the EU.

■ Legal criteria. Ability to take on the obligations of EU membership,
including acceptance of the aims of political, economic and monetary
union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Historic candidate relations Türkiye: application, association agreement, customs union, status accession candidate, begin of negotiations

A
  • Türkiye submitted its application for membership on 14 April 1987.
  • In 1963, Türkiye and the EEC entered into an association agreement
  • . In 1995 a customs union was formed
  • in Helsinki in December 1999 the European Council decided to grant Türkiye the official status of an accession candidate
  • European Council mandate in 2004, the negotiations began in October 2005, but continue to be challenging. T
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Withdrawal clause: Art., conditions, what happens without agreement.

Expulsion clause?

A
  • A withdrawal clause (Article 50) has been incorporated into the EU Treaty, allowing a Member State to leave, wihtout conditions.
  • If no agreement between the EU and the Member State
    concerned on the arrangements for its withdrawal is reached, withdrawal becomes effective without any agreement 2 years after the notification of the intention to withdraw
  • There is no provision for the expulsion of a Member State from the EU against its declared will, however, even for serious and persistent breaches of the treaties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Treaties governing UK withdrawal

A
  • Withdrawal Agreement, governing the terms of the exit process
  • Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which stablishes a
    comprehensive trade partnership.
  • Political Declaration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Key elements: Backstop and Reciprocal citizens’ right

A
  • Reciprocal citizens’ right: EU citizens and UK citizens who exercised their right to reside in the respective territory before the end of the transition period (31 December 2020) and continue to live there afterwards will enjoy for life all rights to which they were entitled before Brexit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Fundamental values EU - Treaty Articles and list of values/aims

A
  • Article 2 TEU (values of the Union): respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.
  • Article 3 TEU (aims of the Union): The Union’s aim is to promote peace, its values and the well-being of
    its peoples; offer its citizens an area of freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers; establish an internal market
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Art 7 (TEU) Procedure and voting quoras

A
  1. Heads of State or Government in the European Council must unanimously determine the existence of a serious and persistent breach of the values and principles of the EU. This determination is made by the Heads of State or Government based on a proposal by one third of the Member States or by the European Commission, and after obtaining the
    assent of the European Parliament.
  2. The Council of the European Union may then, acting by a qualified majority, suspend certain of the rights deriving from the application of the EU Treaty and the TFEU to the Member State in question, including voting rights in the Council
  3. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may decide subsequently to vary or revoke measures taken under paragraph 3 in response to changes in the situation which led to their being imposed.
  4. The voting arrangements applying to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council for the purposes of this Article are laid down in Article 354 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Aims EU within its borders Art 3

A
  • promote peace, its values and the well-being of its citizens
  • offer freedom, security and justice without internal borders, while also taking appropriate measures at its external borders to regulate asylum and immigration and prevent and combat crime
  • establish an internal market
  • achieve sustainable development based on balanced economic growth and price stability and a highly competitive market economy with full employment and social progress
  • protect and improve the quality of the environment
  • promote scientific and technological progress
  • combat social exclusion and discrimination
  • promote social justice and protection, equality between women and men, and protection of the rights of the child
  • enhance economic, social and territorial cohesion and solidarity among EU countries
  • respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity
  • establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Aims EU within the wider world, Art 3 TEU

A
  • uphold and promote its values and interests
  • contribute to peace and security and the sustainable development of the Earth
  • contribute to solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and the protection of human rights
  • strict observance of international law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Case law of fundamental rights - history and basic rights secured by EU law (rather than treaty provision)

A

In 1969 in Satuder Judgement, Court recognised the existence of an EU framework of fundamental rights

List: right
of ownership, freedom to engage in an occupation, the inviolability of the home, freedom of opinion, general rights of personality, the protection of the family (e.g. family members’ rights to join a migrant worker), economic freedom and freedom of religion or faith, along with a number of fundamental procedural right, principle of equal treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Article linking actions of the EU institutions and the Member States, insofar as they apply and implement EU law, to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

A

Art. 6 TEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Proclamation Charter on Fundamental Rights - first time and then as separate instrument second time

A
  • Nice European Council on 7 December 2000
  • Second time on 12 December 2007 in Strasbourg. The EU Treaty refers to this version of the charter in binding form.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Charter on Fundamental Rights does not apply to which country and why?

A

Poland, as it did not wish to adopt the system of fundamental rights
of the charter, as it was concerned that it would be obliged to surrender or
at least change certain national positions concerning, in particular, issues of
religion and faith.

Poland is therefore not bound by the fundamental rights
of the charter, but by the case-law of the Court of Justice, as previously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Enhanced cooperation: legal basis

A
  • Art. 20 TEU
  • Art. 326 - 334 TFEU
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Enhanced cooperation: practice
- when it can be uses
- who can participate
- can be used always?
- minium number of MS
- Are Acts part of EU acquis?
- Are th expenditures covered?
- Must policies be consistent, and who checks?

A
  • may be used only within the framework of the EU’s existing competence and must serve to further the objectives of the Union and reinforce the European integration process (Art 20 TEU)
  • must be open to all Member States
  • may be undertaken only as a last resort
  • minimum threshold for establishing enhanced cooperation is nine Member
    States
  • Acts adopted within the framework of enhanced cooperation are not regarded as part of the EU acquis
  • Expenditure resulting from enhanced cooperation, other than administrative costs, are to be financed by the participating Member States, unless all members of the Council, acting unanimously after consulting the European Parliament, decide otherwise
  • The Council and the Commission must ensure the consistency of activities undertaken within the framework of enhanced cooperation with the other policies and activities of the Union
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Enhanced cooperation: uses

A
  • First time: Regulation that allows spouses of different nationalities to choose the applicable law for a divorce failed in 2006, Enhanced cooperation was established in 2010
  • Unitary patent protection (all wihtout ES,Croatia) in 2012
  • EPPO in 2017, 22 MS have so far joined
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Cases establishing the nature of EU

A
  • Van Gend & Loos in 1963
  • Costa v Enel in 1964
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Elements that characterise the special legal nature of the EU, based on 2 seminal cases

A
  • the institutional set-up,
  • the transfer of powers to the EU institutions to a greater degree than in other international organisations
  • establishment of its own legal order
  • direct applicability of EU law
  • ## primacy of EU law,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

The freedoms and their respective articles

A
  • General: Art. 26 TFEU
  • Free movement of Goods (Art. 34)
  • Free movement of persons (Art 45,49)
    -Freedom to provide services (Art. 57)
  • Free movement of capital (Art. max 63)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Four Convergence criteria euro

A
  • Price stability: inflation rate: max 1.5% above rate of 3 best performing MS
  • Sound public finances: deficit max 3%, Gov debt: 60% (not under EDP at time of examinatioN=
    -Exchange rate stability: Participation in ERM II for at least 2 years without severe tensions, in particular without devaluing against the euro
  • long-term interest rate: max 2% above three best performing MS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

euro Accession: founding MS, and new ones

A

Founding: DE, IT, LUX, BE, NL, AT, FR, FI, PT, ES
Greece: 2001
Slovenia: 2007
Cyprus: 2008
Malta: 2008
Slovakia: 2009
Estonia: 2011
Latvia: 2014
Lithuania: 2015
Croatia: 2023

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Countries that secured either opt-out of obligation of joining euro or are special case + procedure

A
  • DK, can decide whether and when the procedure for verifying compliance with
    the criteria for joining the single currency is initiated
  • Sweden: adoption of the
    euro depends on whether the Commission and ECB recommend Sweden’s participation to the Council. If such a recommendation is made and approved by the Council, Sweden will not be able to refuse to participate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Rights of EU citizenships and corresponding articles

A

Art 20 TFEU: establishment of EU citizenship

Art. 21 TFEU: free movement in EU

Art 22 TFEU: right to vote and stand candidate in local elections of MS where he resides

Art 23 TFEU: entitlement to protection by the diplomatic and consular authorities of any Member State

Art 24 TFEU: right to petition the European Parliament

Art 20(2) + Art 18 TFEU: right to be treated by all Member States in the same way as they treat their own nationals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Legal basis princicple of conferral, and art of concrete powers

A

Art 5 TEU

Art 2, 3, 4, 6 TFEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Shared competencies + special cases

A

Art 4 TFEU

(a) internal market;

(b) social policy, for the aspects defined in this Treaty;

(c) economic, social and territorial cohesion;

(d) agriculture and fisheries, excluding the conservation of marine biological resources;

(e) environment;

(f) consumer protection;

(g) transport;

(h) trans-European networks;

(i) energy;

(j) area of freedom, security and justice;

(k) common safety concerns in public health matters, for the aspects defined in this Treaty.

In some areas, exercise of that competence shall not result in Member States being prevented from exercising theirs:
- research, technological development, space, development cooperation and humanitarian aid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Exclusive competencies

A

Art 3 TFEU

customs union, competition rules for internal market, monetary policy for the Member States whose currency is the euro, the conservation of marine biological resources under the common fisheries policy, common commercial policy.

In addition, EC also has exclusive competence for the conclusion of an international agreement when its conclusion is provided for in a legislative act of the Union or is necessary to enable the Union to exercise its internal competence, or in so far as its conclusion may affect common rules or alter their scope.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Competence to carry out supporting action + special mentioning

A

Art 6 TFEU

(a) protection and improvement of human health;

(b) industry;

(c) culture;

(d) tourism;

(e) education, vocational training, youth and sport;

(f) civil protection;

(g) administrative cooperation.

In the areas of employment and economic policy, the Member States explicitly acknowledge the need to coordinate national measures within the EU –> Art 2(3) TFEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Dispositive powers or flexibility clause - what they are and how they can be used, and if everywhere

A

Art. 352 TFEU

confer on the institutions a power to act when it is essential for the operation of the single market or for ensuring undistorted competition

Process: Council adopts unanimously following COM proposal and EP consent, in all areas both OLS and Special legislative procedure ones

Cannot be used for CFSP. Article 352 TFEU may not be used as a basis for measures that entail harmonisation of national laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Implied powers: what they are, case law,

A

Implied – or implicit – powers are, however, powers that have not been explicitly conferred upon (power of action) the EU in the treaties but derive either from the explicitly conferred powers or the objectives of the EU.

Case law: 1971 European agreement on road transport case and Kramer case (fishing quotas): essentially allows EU to negotiate international agreements in matters where it has competence to adopt internal rules.

Legal basis: Art 352(1) TFEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Subsidiarity principle: legal basis, 2 facets, what happens in case of breach

A

Art. 5 TEU, + 2 protocols
- Protocol 1 encourages national parliaments’ involvement in EU activities, and requires EU documents and proposals to be forwarded promptly to them so they can examine them before the Council of the European Union makes a decision.
- Protocol 2 requires the European Commission to take into account the regional and local dimension of all draft legislative acts and to make a detailed statement on how the principle of subsidiarity is respected

  1. affirmative statement that the EU must act where the objectives to be pursued can be better attained at the Union level (added value)
  2. negative statement that it must not act where objectives can be satisfactorily attained by the Member States acting individually, which constrains them
  3. It must not fall within EU’s exclusive competency

In the event of a breach of the principle of subsidiarity, the European Committee of the Regions or Member States may refer an adopted act directly to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Principle of proportionality

A

Art 5(4) TEU: content and form of Union action shall not exceed what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaties.

Criteria set out in Protocol Nr

EU measures:
- must be suitable to achieve the desired end;
- must be necessary to achieve the desired end; and
- must not impose a burden on the individual that is excessive in relation to the objective sought to be achieved (proportionality in the narrow sense).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

History principle subsidiarity

A
  • The principle of subsidiarity was formally enshrined by the TEU, 1992
  • The Single European Act, signed in 1986, had already incorporated a subsidiarity criterion into environmental policy, however, albeit without referring to it explicitly as such
  • Protocol annexed by Treaty of Amsterdam
  • Lisbon Treaty added subnational level, more enforcement, put it in Art 5 TEU
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

early warning’ mechanism for subsidiarity: steps, majorities, yellow card, judicial review etc.

A
  1. COM must send draft law simultaneously also to national Parliaments
  2. 8 weeks from the date of forwarding of a draft legislative act to send to the Presidents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a reasoned opinion stating why it considers that the draft in question does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
    - Each national Parliament gets two votes
  3. If national Parliaments representing at least one third of all the votes dissent, draft must be reviewed (yellow card). This threshold is a quarter in the case of a draft legislative act submitted on the basis of Article 76 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the area of freedom, security and justice.
  4. The institution which produced the draft legislative act may decide to maintain, amend or withdraw it, giving reasons for that decision.
    - Under OLS, simple majority of the votes allocated to the national Parliaments is enough to trigger review, and, if Commission insists, Council and EP vote in first reading; EP with majority and Council with 55% of its members (orange card). If this happens, proposal is nil.

Compliance with the principle of subsidiarity may be reviewed retrospectively (following the adoption of the legislative act) by means of a legal action brought before the CJE. This can be done:
- By MS in accordance to Art. 263 TFEU, on behalf of their national parliament or a chamber thereof
- By Committee of Regions in accordance of Art. 263 TFEU, in cases that TFEU stipulates that it must be consulted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Statistics yellow card and orange card

A

The ‘yellow card’ procedure has been triggered three times, while the ‘orange card’ procedure has never been used.

In 2013, first yellow card with Monti II Regulation. EC withdrew proposal

In 2013, second yellow card for EPPO proposal. EC maintained proposal

In 2016 third yellow card for Posted workers directive. EC maintained proposal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Subsidiarity review under Juncker

A
  • Junkcer white paper in xxx
  • In March 2017, the Commission created a dedicated ‘Task Force on subsidiarity, proportionality and doing less more efficiently’, as part of the Better Regulation agenda
  • Subsidiarity package in 2018, with aim to strengthen the role of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in EU policymaking.
47
Q

Legal sources EU law - hierarchy of norms

A

Primary EU law: EU’s founding Treaties (TEU, TFEU, Euratom Treaty, protocols, accession treaties), Charter on Fundamental Rights, general principles of EU law established by CJEU

The EU’s international agreements (higher as established by case-law)

Secondary EU law - legislative acts: Law made by the EU institutions by exercising the powers conferred on them

Secondary law - non-legislative acts:

General principles of law

Conventions between MS

48
Q

Direct effect EU law

A
49
Q

Types of secondary legislation, and when is an act considered legsilative

A

those listed in Art. 288 TFEU: Regulations, directives, decisions, (binding) opinions, and recommendations (non-binding)

those not listed in Article 288 TFEU: atypical acts, such as the rules of procedure of the institutions and interinstitutional agreements.

Art 290 TFEU: delegated acts

Art 291: implementing acts

Art 289 TFEU: Legal acts adopted by legislative procedure shall constitute legislative acts.

50
Q

Cases in which ECB is involved

A

Based on van gend en Loos judgement. In its judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) enshrines the direct effect of European Union (EU) law. The judgment states that EU law not only engenders obligations for EU Member States, but also rights for individuals.

There are two aspects to direct effect: a vertical aspect and a horizontal aspect.
1) Vertical direct effect is of consequence in relations between individuals and the country. This means that individuals can invoke a provision of EU law in relation to the state.

2)Horizontal direct effect is of consequence in relations between individuals. This means that an individual can invoke a provision of EU law in relation to another individual.

According to the type of act concerned, the Court has accepted either a full direct effect (i.e. a horizontal direct effect and a vertical direct effect) or a partial direct effect (confined to a vertical direct effect).

Primary law sources:
- As far as primary law is concerned, the Court established the principle of direct effect in the Van Gend en Loos judgment. However, it laid down the condition that the obligations must be precise, clear and unconditional and that they must not call for additional measures, either national or European.
- In the Becker judgment, the Court rejected direct effect where the countries have a margin of discretion, however minimal, regarding the implementation of the provision in question

In secondary law
- Regulations: Art 288 TFEU, however, rules must be precise
- Directive: see other card, only has vertical direct effect
- Decisions: may have direct effect when they refer to a Member State as the addressee. The Court therefore recognises only a direct vertical effect
- international agreements: In its Demirel v Stadt Schwäbisch Gmünd judgment, the Court recognised the direct effect of certain agreements in accordance with the same criteria identified in the Van Gend en Loos case.

51
Q

Can Directives have direct effect without transposition? List criteria + horizontal and vertical direct effect dimension

A

Yes, CJEU ruling under following conditions
(a) the directive has not been transposed into national law or has been transposed incorrectly;
(b) the provisions of the directive are imperative and sufficiently clear and precise; and
(c) the provisions of the directive confer rights on individuals.

If these conditions have been met, individuals may invoke the provision in question in their dealings with the public authorities.

Compensation can be sought by citizens (CJEU case law) when:
(a) the directive is intended to confer rights on individuals;
(b) the content of the rights can be identified on the basis of the provisions of the directive; and
(c) there is a causal link between the breach of the obligation to transpose the directive and the loss and damage suffered by the injured parties

horizontal and vertical direct effect:
* In that context it is significant that the Court of Justice has applied the principle solely in cases between citizen and Member State, and then only when the directive was for the citizen’s benefit and not to their detriment. - the so called “vertical direct effect”
* The direct effect of directives in relations between citizens themselves (‘horizontal direct effect’) has not been accepted by the Court of Justice. However, there is an exception when it comes to with regard to the prohibition on discrimination in all cases in which the latter is given expression in a directive

52
Q

Directives: legal basis, goals, effect, what happens if country does not implement in time, minimum and max harmonisation, transposition gap

A

Legal basis: Art 288 TFEU

  • unlike a decision, the directive has general application.
  • Unlike regulation which seeks unification, a directive seeka harmonisation of MS laws
  • For a directive to take effect at national level, Member States must adopt a law to transpose it.
  • When a country does not transpose a directive, the Commission may initiate infringement proceedings and bring proceedings against the country before the Court of Justice of the European Union
  • Under Article 260, paragraph 3, where a Member State fails to notify the measures transposing a directive, the Commission may request that the Member State in question pays a fine.
  • n the case of minimum harmonisation, a directive sets minimum standards, often in recognition of the fact that the legal systems in some Member States have already set higher standards. In this case, Member States have the right to set higher standards than those set in the directive.
  • In the case of maximum harmonisation, Member States have to introduce rules with minimum and maximum standards set in the directive.
  • The EU has set a target of reducing the transposition deficit – the gap between the number of directives adopted by the EU and the number of directives Member States have transposed – to 1%. A transposition scoreboard is updated every year as part of the single market scoreboard
53
Q

effect of objective
law of Directives

A
  • The same conditions apply to the recognition of this effect as for the
    recognition of a direct effect, the only exception being that, instead of clear and precise law being set out for the EU citizen or enterprise, a clear and precise obligation is established for the Member States
  • Where this is the case, all institutions – i.e. the legislator, administration and courts of the Member States – are bound by the directive and must automatically comply with it and apply it as EU law with primacy
  • In concrete terms, they also therefore have an obligation to interpret national law in accordance with the directives or give the provision of the directive in question priority of application over conflicting national law
54
Q

Decisions: legal basis, when thery are lgislative acts and when they are applicable, two types of decisions, types of general deisions

A

Two types of decisions: decisions that specify those to whom they are addressed, and general decisions that do not have any specific addressees (cf. Article 288(4) TFEU

Decisions are legislative acts when they are adopted jointly by:
* the European Parliament and the Council under the ordinary legislative procedure, or
* the European Parliament with the participation of the Council, orthe Council with the participation of the European Parliament under the special legislative procedure.
* Article 297 TFEU requires legislative decisions to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. They enter into force on the date specified in them or, if no date is specified, on the 20th day following that of their publication. The same rule applies to non-legislative decisions which do not specify to whom they are addressed.
* A decision which specifies to whom it is addressed may also be published in the Official Journal. However, publication does not do away with the need for notification, which is the only way to ensure the act produces legal effects.

Decisions are non-legislative acts when they are not adopted in accordance with legislative procedure. They may be adopted, for example, by the European Council, the Council or the European Commission. Non-legislative decisions may also take the form of delegated and implementing acts.

Non-legislative decisions have in particular become the basic legal acts in the field of common foreign and security policy (CFSP).

Decision that specify addresse vs other acts
* It is distinguished from the regulation by being of individual applicability: the persons to whom it is addressed must be named in it and are the only ones bound by it
* It is distinguished from the directive in that it is binding in its entirety (whereas the directive simply sets out the objective to be attained).
* It is directly binding on those to whom it is addressed. A decision
addressed to a Member State may in fact have the same direct effect in
relation to the citizen as a directive
* Decisions addressed to a specific Member State or all Member States as the addressee(s) may also have a direct effect. CJEU recognises only a ‘vertical’ direct effect of decisions addressed to one or several Member States.

General decisions
General decisions that do not specify to whom they are addressed are
binding in their entirety, although it is not clear whom they are binding upon. This can ultimately only be established from the content of each decision.

There are several categories:
* Decisions for amending treaty provisions. These decisions are
applicable in a general and abstract manner, which is to say they are
binding on all EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, and on the
Member States
* Decisions for adding substance to treaty law. These decisions have
binding effect on the whole of the EU, or on the relevant EU institutions,
bodies, offices or agencies in the case of a decision regarding their
composition; they do not have any external effect on the individual.
* Decisions for adopting intra-institutional and interinstitutional law. These decisions are binding on the EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies that are affected and involved
* Decisions in the context of organisational control. These decisions (e.g. appointments, remuneration) bind the relevant officeholder or members of bodies.
* Decisions for making policy. These decisions compete with regulations and directives but are not intended to have an external, legally binding effect on the individual. In principle, their binding effect is confined to the institutions involved in issuing them, particularly when they relate to orientations or guidelines for future policy. Only in exceptional cases do they have legal effects of a general and abstract nature or financial consequences.
* Decisions within the framework of the common foreign and security
policy
. These decisions are legally binding on the EU. The extent to
which they are binding on the Member States is restricted by special
provisions (e.g. Articles 28(2) and (5) and 31(1) TEU). They are not
subject to the supremacy of the case-law of the Court of Justice.

55
Q

Recommendations

A
  • Recommendations are one of two forms of non-binding EU acts cited in the article, the other form being opinions.
  • In recommendations, the party to whom they are addressed is called on, but not placed under any legal obligation, to behave in a particular way
  • Other EU institutions, such as the European Parliament, the Council and the European Central Bank, also issue recommendations.
56
Q

Opinions: what they are + examples of where they are used

A
  • Opinions, on the other hand, are issued by the EU institutions when giving an assessment of a given situation or developments in the EU or individual Member States.
  • In some cases, they also prepare the way for subsequent,
    legally binding acts, or are a prerequisite for the institution of proceedings before the Court of Justice (cf. Articles 258 and 259 TFEU)

The following are examples of instances where EU institutions issue opinions:
* EC: Where a country submits an application to join the EU, under Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union, the Council of the European Union must request the Commission’s opinion on that country’s proposed accession.
* EC: Where Member States seek the Commission’s views on the application of specific aspects of legal acts they adopt or seek guidance on their implementatio
* Council: issues opinions on Member States’ economic partnership programmes in the context of Regulation (EU) No 473/2013 on common rules for monitoring and assessing draft budgetary plans and ensuring the correction of euro area Member States’ excessive deficit

57
Q

Resolutions

A

Resolutions:
* Resolutions may be issued by the Parliament, the European Council and the Council.
* They set out jointly held views and intentions regarding the overall process of integration and specific tasks within and outside the EU.
* The primary significance of these resolutions is that they help to give the future work of the Council a political direction.
* As manifestations of a commonly held political will, resolutions make it considerably easier to achieve a consensus in the Council, in addition to which they guarantee at least a minimum degree of correlation between
decision-making hierarchies in the EU and the Member States

58
Q

Declarations

A

The declaration is used to both convey and clarify the point of view of one, and usually more of the institutions of the European Union on a given topic. The explanation provided is non-binding.

The institutions concerned issue a statement together. The European Commission informs the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament of any issued declarations.

Declarations as legal instrument are not mentioned in the Treaties.

There are two different kinds of declaration:
* If a declaration is concerned with the further development of the EU, such as the declaration on the EU, the declaration on democracy and the declaration on fundamental rights and freedoms, it is more or less equivalent to a resolution.
* The other type of declaration is issued in the context of the Council’s decision-making process, and sets out the views of all or individual Council members regarding the interpretation of the Council’s decisions.
* Interpretative declarations of this kind are standard practice in the Council and are an essential means of achieving compromises.
* Their legal significance should be assessed under the basic principles of interpretation, according to which the key factor when interpreting the meaning of a legal provision should in all cases be the underlying intention of its originator.

59
Q

Action programmes

A

These programmes are drawn up by the Council and the Commission on their own initiative or at the instigation of the European Council, and serve to put into practice the legislative programmes and general objectives laid down in the treaties.

If a programme is specifically provided for in the treaties, the EU institutions are bound by those provisions when planning it. On the other hand, other programmes are in practice merely regarded as general guidelines with no legally binding effect. They are, however, an indication of the EU institutions’ intended actions.

60
Q

White Papers and Green Papers

A
  • White Papers are published by the Commission and contain concrete proposals for EU measures in a specific policy area. If a White Paper is favourably received by the Council, it may form the basis for an EU action programme.
  • Examples of this include the White Papers on the future of Europe (2017) and artificial intelligence (2020)
  • Green Papers are intended to stimulate discussion on given topics at the EU level and form the basis for public consultation and debate regarding the topics dealt with in the Green Paper. They may give rise to legislative developments that are then outlined in White Papers
61
Q

Publication and communication in OJ

A
  • EU legislative acts and legally binding acts are published in the Official
    Journal of the European Union, L series (L = legislation). They enter into
    force on the date specified in them or, if no date is specified, on the 20th
    day following their publication.
  • There is no obligation to publish and communicate non-binding instruments, but they are usually published in the Official Journal of the European Union, C series (‘information and notices’ (C = communication)).
  • All the official documents of the EU institutions, bodies and agencies are also published in the C series.
  • Legislative acts that specify to whom they are addressed are notified to
    those to whom they are addressed and take effect upon such notification.
62
Q

. A distinction between different legislative procedures

A
  1. the ordinary legislative procedure for the adoption of legislative acts (Article 289(1) TFEU), which essentially corresponds to the earlier codecision procedure and applies as a general rule to lawmaking at the EU level, along with the special legislative procedure (Article 289(2) TFEU), in which legislative acts are adopted by the Parliament with the participation of the Council, or by the latter with the participation of the Parliament;
  2. certain legal acts that must go through a consent procedure in the Parliament before they can take effect;
  3. non-legislative acts that are adopted in a simplified procedure;
  4. special procedures that are in place for the adoption of delegated acts and implementing acts.
63
Q

Conciliation procedure: who calls it, what it is, what the goal is

A

The conciliation procedure is initiated by the President of the Council in
agreement with the President of the European Parliament.
* At its heart is the Conciliation Committee, which is currently composed of 27 representatives each from the Parliament and the Council.
* The Conciliation Committee has the task of reaching agreement on a joint text by a qualified majority within 6 weeks of its being convened, on the basis of the positions of the Parliament and the Council at second reading.

This involves a compromise solution that is to be found on the basis of ‘examination of all the aspects of the disagreement’.
* To this end, use may be made of new items that facilitate the
compromise process, provided that they fit into the overall outcome of the second reading. However, it is not possible to make use of amendments that failed to achieve the required majorities at second reading

Commission role and finalisation:
* The Commission takes part in the Conciliation Committee’s proceedings and takes all the necessary initiatives with a view to reconciling the positions of the Parliament and the Council
* If, within 6 weeks of its being convened, the Conciliation Committee does not approve the joint text, the proposed act is deemed not to have been adopted

64
Q

special legislative procedure: different types

A

The special legislative procedure is usually characterised by:
* the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the Parliament, e.g. Article 308 TFEU: Statute of the
European Investment Bank
* the Parliament adopting a legal act after obtaining the approval of the Council, e.g. Article 226, third paragraph, TFEU: exercise of the right of inquiry via a parliamentary committee of inquiry; Article 228(4) TFEU: conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties)

There are further forms of lawmaking that differ from these regular cases but are nonetheless attributable to special legislative procedure.
* Taking a decision on the budget (Article 314 TFEU): the procedure has detailed rules and largely corresponds to the ordinary legislative procedure.
* The Council takes a decision by majority on a proposal of the Commission and after consulting the Parliament (or other EU institutions and consultative bodies). This was originally the consultation procedure that was initially the standard legislative procedure at the EU level, but it is now used only in isolated cases as a special legislative procedure (e.g. Article 140(2) TFEU: derogations in the context of economic and monetary union; Article 128(2) TFEU: issuing coins)
* The Council takes a decision without the participation of the Parliament. This constitutes a rare exception, however, and – other than in the area of the common foreign and security policy, where the Parliament is informed by Council decisions (Article 36 TEU) – only takes place in very isolated cases (e.g. Article 31 TFEU: fixing a Common Customs Tariff; Article 301(2) TFEU: composition of the European Economic and Social Committee)

65
Q

special legislative procedure: briding clauses

A

Policy areas for which there is provision for a special legislative procedure can be switched to the ordinary legislative procedure by means of bridging clauses’, or unanimity in the Council can be replaced by a qualified majority.

A distinction is to be made between two types of bridging clauses:
* the general bridging clause that applies to all policy areas and requires a unanimous decision from the European Council
* specific bridging clauses that apply to certain policy areas (e.g. multiannual financial framework: Article 312 TFEU; judicial cooperation in family law: Article 81(3) TFEU; enhanced cooperation: Article 333 TFEU; the social domain: Article 153 TFEU; the environment: Article 192 TFEU). These clauses differ from general bridging clauses in that, as a general rule, the national parliaments do not have a right of veto and the decision can also be made by the Council and not necessarily the European Council.

66
Q

Flexibility in EU decision-making: passerelle clauses

A

Passerelle clauses: /Art 48 TFEU)
* Passerelle clauses allow derogation from the legislative procedures initially provided for by the treaties. Specifically, and under certain conditions, they make it possible:
* to switch from the special legislative procedure to the ordinary legislative procedure in order to adopt an act in a given policy area;
* to switch from voting by unanimity to qualified majority voting in a given policy area.
* Activating a passerelle clause still depends on a decision being adopted unanimously by the Council or by the European Council. Thus, in every case, all EU countries must be in agreement before such a clause may be activated.
* Furthermore, Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union introduces a general passerelle clause applicable to all European policies (see summary on ‘revisions to the treaties’. In addition, there are 6 other passerelle clauses specific to certain European policies, presenting certain procedural particularities (see summary on ‘legislative procedures’).

67
Q

Approval procedure (what it is and example areas)

A

Another principal form of Parliamentary involvement in the EU legislative
process is the approval procedure, whereby a legal instrument can only be adopted with the prior approval of the Parliament. This procedure does not, however, give the Parliament any scope for directly influencing the nature of the legal provisions.

Provision is made for this procedure in connection with the conclusion of international agreements (Article 218(6)(a) TFEU), enhanced cooperation (Article 329(1) TFEU) or for the exercise of dispositive powers (Article 352(1) TFEU). The approval procedure can form part of both a special legislative procedure for adopting legislative acts and the simplified legislative procedure for adopting binding, non-legislative acts

68
Q

Art 48 TFEU Flexibility in EU decision-making: brake clauses: which areas they apply to, what tehy are, how they work

A

Brake clauses concern 3 areas:
* the measures for coordinating social security systems for migrant workers (Article 48 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU));
* judicial cooperation in criminal matters (Article 82 of the TFEU);
* the establishment of common rules for certain criminal offences (Article 83 of the TFEU).

Brake clauses were created to enable the ordinary legislative procedure to be applied to these 3 policy areas. The ordinary legislative procedure is restrained by a braking mechanism: an EU country may submit an appeal to the European Council if it considers that
* the fundamental principles of its social security system or
* its criminal justice system

are threatened by the draft legislation being adopted. In this case, the procedure is suspended and the European Council may:
* either send the draft back to the Council which shall continue with the procedure, taking into account the observations made;
* orstop the procedure permanently and request a new proposal from the European Commission, if appropriate.

Therefore, the importance of brake clauses lies not only in the mechanism they propose, but also in the fact that they enable the ordinary legislative procedure to be extended to the policies concerned. The introduction of this mechanism into the decision-making process has convinced the most resistant of EU countries to apply the ordinary legislative procedure to certain policies, where they had previously applied the rule of voting by unanimity.

69
Q

Art 48 TFEU Flexibility in EU decision-making: accelerazot clauses

A

Accelerator clauses ‘accelerate’ the integration between certain EU countries by facilitating the establishment of enhanced cooperation in certain areas.

These clauses allow derogation from the engagement procedure for enhanced cooperation. Thus, as a result of these clauses, an enhanced cooperation is considered to be formed once it includes at least 9 EU countries. The Council, the Parliament and the Commission are therefore simply informed of the participating countries’ desire to establish an enhanced cooperation.

These clauses concern 4 areas:
* judicial cooperation in criminal matters (Article 82 of the TFEU); the establishment of common rules for certain criminal offences (Article 83 of the TFEU);
* the creation of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (Article 86 of the TFEU);
* police cooperation (Article 87 of the TFEU).

70
Q

Procedure for adopting non-legislative acts

A

Non-legislative acts are adopted in a simplified procedure in which an EU institution or other body adopts a legal act within its own powers. The authority to do so arises from the relevant basis of competence in the EU treaties.

This procedure initially applies to (simple) binding legislative acts that are
adopted by an EU institution within its own powers (e.g. Commission regarding State aid, Article 108(2) TFEU).

The simplified procedure is also used for the adoption of non-binding instruments, especially recommendations and opinions issued by the EU institutions and the consultative bodies.

71
Q

Procedure for adopting delegated acts and implementing act: what they are, when they are used, and how procedure works

A

The Treaty of Lisbon made a long overdue distinction in primary law in relation to the performance of legislative tasks and executive tasks (Articles 290 and 291 TFEU).

The delegation of power is subject to the following conditions:
* the European Parliament or the Council may decide to revoke the delegation;
* the delegated act may enter into force only if no objection has been expressed by the European Parliament or the Council within a deadline set by the legislative act.

Delegated acts:
* The adoption of delegated acts is carried out by the Commission on the basis of a special authorisation provided by a legislative act passed by the Parliament and the Council (Article 290 TFEU).
* The subject of the delegation can consist only of the amendment of certain non-essential elements of a legislative act;
* The objectives, content, scope and duration of the delegation of power shall be explicitly defined in the legislative acts
* Parliament and Council may revoke the delegation or express objections to the delegated act
* Adoption procedure: The Commission prepares and adopts delegated acts after consulting expert groups, composed of representatives from each EU country, which meet on a regular or occasional basis. Once the Commission has adopted the act, Parliament and Council generally have two months to formulate any objections. If they do not, the delegated act enters into force.

Implementing act:
* Primary responsibility for implementing EU law lies with EU countries. However, in areas where uniform conditions for implementation are needed (taxation, agriculture, the internal market, health and food safety, etc.), the Commission (or exceptionally the Council) adopts an implementing act.
* The adoption of implementing acts by the Commission (Article 291 TFEU) is designed as an exception to the principle of the Member States’ responsibility for the administrative implementation of EU law (Article 197 TFEU)
* Before the Commission can adopt an implementing act, it must usually consult a committee in which every EU country is represented.
* The committee enables EU countries to oversee the Commission’s work as it adopts an implementing act – a procedure referred to in EU jargon as ‘comitology’.
*

72
Q

Comitology committee

A

There are the two comitlogy proceures:advisory procedure and the examination procedure. Specific provisions on the choice of procedure have been created.

Advisory procedure
* In the advisory procedure, an advisory committee delivers opinions by a simple majority, which are recorded in the minutes. The Commission should take the utmost account of them, but is not obliged to do so

Examination procedure:
* In the examination procedure, the comitology committee, which is composed of representatives of the Member States, votes on the Commission draft for implementing measures by qualified majority.
* If it is approved, the Commission must adopt the measures as submitted. If no decision is taken owing to the absence of a quorum, the Commission may in principle adopt its draft.
* In the case of a negative opinion from the committee or a lack of approval, the Commission may submit a new draft in the examination committee or refer the original draft to an appeal committee.

Appeal committee:
* The appeal committee is the second instance in the examination procedure. The purpose of referral to the appeal committee is to reach a compromise between the Commission and the representatives of the Member States if it is not possible to reach an outcome in the examination committee
* Where the appeal committee delivers a positive opinion, the Commission adopts the implementing act. It may also do so if no opinion is delivered.

73
Q

The European Union system of legal protection

A
  • Basic right in Art. 47 CFR
  • It is guaranteed by the EU’s legal system (the Court of Justice and the General Court – Article 19(1) TEU).

A series of procedures is available for legal protection:
* Treaty infringement proceedings (Article 258 TFEU)
* Actions for annulment (Article 263 TFEU)
* Complaints for failure to act (Article 265 TFEU)
* Actions for damages (Article 268 and Article 340, second paragraph, TFEU)
* Actions by European Union staff (Article 270 TFEU)
* Appeals procedure (Article 256 TFEU)
* Provisional legal protection (Articles 278 and 279 TFEU)
* Preliminary rulings (Article 267 TFEU

74
Q

Treaty infringement proceedings (Article 258 TFEU)

A

This is a procedure for establishing whether a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation imposed on it by EU law. It is conducted exclusively before the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Failure to meet EU obligations may be due to:
* legislative or administrative decisions or practices;
* positive action (adopting measures contrary to EU law or not repealing any that are);
* negative action (delays in implementing EU law or failing to inform the Commission of the implementation).

Procedure:
* The Commission or an EU country indicates that a given EU country may not be meeting its obligations.
* The Commission sends a letter of formal notice to the country in question requesting further information. That country must send a detailed reply by a given deadline, usually 2 months.

On the basis of this reply, the Commission may:
* issue a reasoned opinion (a formal request to comply with EU law, calling on the EU country in question to inform it of the measures taken to comply within a specified period, usually 2 months); or
* close the case, in which the issues with the EU country concerned have been solved without the Commission needing to pursue the procedure.

When country fails to comply with COmmission’s opinion within timeta le given:
* the Commission may refer the case to the Court of Justice
* If another EU country has initiated the procedure, it may refer the case to the Court even if the Commission does not deliver a reasoned opinion.
* The Court can instruct an EU country it considers is breaking EU law to take certain measures.
* If the Commission believes the country is not complying with the legal ruling, it can refer the case to the Court a second time, recommending the size of fine it considers should be paid.
* If the Court finds that the judgment is still not being respected, it can impose a lump sum and/or penalty payment.
* In the event that the Commission refers an EU country to the Court for failure to communicate national measures implementing EU law, it may at the same time ask the Court to impose financial sanctions. In that case, the Court can impose penalties at the stage of the initial judgment

75
Q

Actions for annulment (Article 263-266 TFEU), definition, scope, and who can bring it before Court, and issue with regulaory acts

A

An action for annulment is a legal instrument that allows EU countries and EU institutions and bodies, as well as citizens, companies and interest groups in certain specific circumstances, to directly request the Court of Justice of the European Union for a judicial review to verify the legality of EU acts.

Actions for annulment are a means to objective judicial control of the action of the EU institutions and bodies (abstract judicial review) and provide the citizen with access to EU justice, although with some restrictions (guarantee of individual legal protection)
* Article 263 makes it possible to take action before the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter ‘the Court’) challenging the legality of European Union (EU) legal acts.
* Article 264 states that if the action is well founded, the Court shall declare the act void or, when necessary, state which of the effects of the act declared void shall be considered as definitive.
* Article 266 requires the party whose act has been annulled to take the necessary measures to comply with the Court’s judgment.

Scope: Article 263 TFEU states that the Court can review the legality of:
* legislative acts;
* acts of the Council, of the European Commission and of the European Central Bank (ECB), other than recommendations and opinions; and
* acts of the European Parliament and of the European Council intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties.
* The Court may also review the legality of acts of EU bodies, offices or agencies intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties.
* The Court has found that in addition to acts like regulations, decisions and directives, which are defined in Article 288 TFEU as binding, it is the content (and intention) of the measure that matters, rather than the form. Thus, the legality of other types of acts, such as Council conclusions, can be contestable

Who can bring action for annulment to the Court?
* Privileged applicants, i.e. EU countries, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. They can always bring an action for judicial review (paragraph 2).
* Semi-privileged applicants, i.e. the Court of Auditors, the ECB and the Committee of the Regions. They may solely bring review proceedings ‘for the purpose of protecting their prerogatives’ (paragraph 3).
* Non-privileged applicants, i.e. legal persons, such as businesses, and natural persons, such as individuals, can bring action for judicial review, but they are subject to more stringent conditions as regards satisfying the legal standing (‘locus standi’) requirement (paragraph 4). This means only proceed against decisions that are personally addressed to them or that, though addressed to others, have a direct individual effect on them.

Additioanl category of players:
* Natural and legal persons now also have standing to institute proceedings against a ‘regulatory act’, provided that it ‘is of direct concern to them and does not entail implementing measures’.
* As Article 263(4) TFEU dispensed with the need for ‘individual concern’ when challenging regulatory acts, and instead only requires direct concern and the absence of national implementing measures
* However, unclear definition of “regulatory act”. In its judgment in the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami case, the General Court dealt with both these approaches in detail and, based on a grammatical, historical and teleological interpretation, concluded that ‘regulatory acts’ can be regarded only as acts of general application that are not legislative acts
* In addition to delegated acts (cf. Article 290 TFEU) and implementing acts (cf. Article 291 TFEU), these also encompass directives, provided that they are directly applicable according to the case-law, and decisions of an abstract and general nature, provided that they were not adopted in the legislative procedure. Therefore, the General Court has clearly adopted a narrow interpretation of the concept of ‘regulatory’.

76
Q

Actions for annulment (Article 263-266 TFEU): process of bringin anulment to court, grounds fro annulent of an act, annulment procedure

A

Bringing an action for annulment
* An action must be brought within 2 months of the act’s publication or of its notification to the applicant. A further 10 days’ extension to allow for postal delays on account of distance exists under Article 51 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — see summary. If the act is not published or notified, the deadline runs from the point at which the applicant gained knowledge about it by other means.
* Non-privileged applicants must establish that they have had an act addressed to them or that the act was both of direct concern and of individual concern to them

Grounds for the annulment of an act: Article 263 TFEU (paragraph 2) sets out the following grounds for annulling an act:
* lack of competence;
* infringement of an essential procedural requirement, for example the need to respect an institution’s prerogatives before taking a decision, as in the requirement to consult in the Isoglucose case (Cases C-138/79 SA Roquette Frères v Council and C-139/79 Maizena GmbH v Council);
* infringement of the treaties or of the Charter of Fundamental Rights; infringement of any rule of law relating to the application of the treaties; and
* the misuse of powers (the applicant must be able to prove on the basis of facts that the contested act was adopted for unauthorised purposes (Case C-23/76 Pellegrini v Commission).

Annulment of an act. Article 264 TFEU is the legal basis for the annulment of an act.
* Where the action for annulment is well founded, the Court declares the act void.
* Where the Court considers it necessary, it can state which of the effects of the act that it has declared void must be considered as definitive. In other words, it can declare certain aspects of the challenged act operative in the interests of: the need for legal certainty or the need to suspend the effects of annulment until a competent institution adopts an act to replace the annulled one.
* When the Court rules that an act is void, the effect of annulment is generally from the point of the adoption of the act in question (known as ex tunc). However, the effect may also be from the date of the Court’s judgment (ex nunc). In addition, the Court may maintain the effects of the annulled act.
* An annulment may also be partial, as in Case C-378/00 Commission v European Parliament and Council, where the Court annuls an article of an act, but declares that the measures implementing that act, which had already been adopted, should stand.

77
Q

Complaints for failure to act (Article 265 TFEU)

A

This form of action supplements the legal protection available against the Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the Commission and the ECB.

Who is scrutinises
* Commission, European Council, Council, ECB, European Parliament
* This Article shall apply, under the same conditions, to bodies, offices and agencies of the Union which fail to act.

Who can bring action:
* the Member States and the other institutions of the Union may bring an action before the Court of Justice of the European Union to have the infringement established.
* Any natural person (individual) or legal person (business or other form of organisation) may, under the conditions laid down above, complain to the Court that an EU institution, body, office or agency has failed to address to that person any act (other than a recommendation or an opinion).
* The order sought in an action by the institutions is a declaration that the body concerned has infringed the treaty by neglecting to take a decision required of it.
* Where the action is brought by an EU citizen or an undertaking, it is for a declaration that the EU institution has infringed the treaty by neglecting to address an individual decision to them.

Process:
* The action is deemed admissible only if the institution, body, office or agency concerned has first been called upon to act.
* If, within 2 months of being called upon to do so, the institution, body, office or agency concerned has not defined its position, the action may be brought within a further period of 2 months.
* The judgment simply finds that the neglect was unlawful. The Court
of Justice / General Court has no jurisdiction to order that a decision be
taken: the party against whom judgment is given is merely required to take measures to comply with the judgment

78
Q

Actions for damages (Article 268 and Article 340, second paragraph, TFEU): what they are, conditions for it, process

Action for European Union Staff

A

An action for damages is a direct action brought before the European Union’s (EU) General Court by any individual or legal person (including an EU Member State) seeking to obtain compensation for damage caused by the EU institutions or bodies or by their servants in the performance of their duties, which results from their administrative or legislative activity.

Overview:
* Article 268 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) states that the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union is exclusive in disputes relating to compensation for damage against the EU. In other words, it is not possible to sue the EU before Member States’ national or international courts.
* Although an action for damages is, in principle, intended to award compensation for the damage suffered, it may also be aimed solely at establishing that the EU is liable, by means of an interlocutory judgment

Process.
* An action for damages must be filed within 5 years of the occurrence of the harmful event. The limitation period can be interrupted in either of two situations:
* if an application initiating proceedings is lodged with the Court of Justice or the Tribunal;
* if the victim makes a prior application to the competent institution.

Conditions set out by the Court:
* There must be an unlawful act by an EU institution or by a member of its staff in the exercise of his or her functions. An unlawful act takes place when there is a serious infringement of a rule of EU law that confers rights on an individual, undertaking or Member State or has been passed to protect them.
* Actual harm must have been suffered.
* There must be a causal link between the act of the EU institution and the damage sustained.
* Intent or negligence do not have to be proved.

Other structure:
* Admissability is: amage is attributable to an institution and, on the other hand, that it was caused by an institution or one of its staff in the performance of their duties.
* Claimant must prove all three: llegal conduct of the institutions or their servants, in the light of EU law; the existence of real and certain damage; the existence of a causal link between the conduct and the damage claimed.

Action for European Union Staff (Art 270 TFEU)
* Disputes between the EU and its staff members or their surviving family members arising from the employment relationship can also be brought before the Court of Justice.
* Jurisdiction for these actions lies with the General Court.

79
Q

Appeals procedure (Article 256 TFEU): what it is, grounds for appeal, process and who can file

A

Under Article 256 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court of Justice may hear appeals of decisions given by the General Court, and the General Court may hear appeals of decisions given by a specialised court (such as, in the past, the Civil Service Tribunal).

Scope and grounds for appeal:
* Appeals on points of law only may be brought before the Court of Justice against judgments and orders of the General Court. If the appeal is admissible and well founded, the Court of Justice may set aside the judgment of the General Court
* The appeal may lie on the grounds of lack of competence of the General Court, a breach of procedure that adversely affects the interests of the appellant or the infringement of EU law by the General Court.

Process and who can file them:
* Rulings made by the General Court, limited to points of law, may, within 2 months, be subject to an appeal to the Court of Justice
* Such an appeal may be brought by any party which has been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, in its submissions. However, interveners other than the EU Member States and the European Union (EU) institutions may bring such an appeal only where the decision of the General Court directly affects them.
* If the matter is ripe for a court ruling, the Court of Justice may issue its own judgment; otherwise, it must refer the matter back to the General Court, which is bound by the Court of Justice’s legal assessment.

80
Q

Preliminary rulings (Article 267 TFEU), subject matter, capacity to procees obligation to refer, effect

A

In Treaties: Arz 267 TFEU and Art 19 TEU

This is the procedure whereby the national courts can seek guidance on EU law from the Court of Justice. The Court of Justice responds in the form of a judgment rather than an advisory opinion; this emphasises the binding nature of its ruling.

The preliminary ruling procedure, unlike the other procedures under consideration here, is not a contentious procedure but simply one stage in the proceedings that begin and end in the national courts.

Objective:
* secure a uniform interpretation of EU law and hence the unity of the EU legal order.
* protecting individual rights.
* The national courts can only assess the compatibility of national and EU law and, in the event of any incompatibility, enforce EU law. This clarity can normally only be brought about by a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice.

Subject matter.
* The Court of Justice rules on the interpretation of instruments of EU law, and
* examines the validity of the EU institutions’ acts of legal significance
* Provisions of national law may not be the subject of a preliminary ruling. In proceedings for a preliminary ruling, the Court of Justice is not empowered to interpret national law or assess its compatibility
with EU law.

Capacity to proceed
* The procedure is available to all ‘courts of the Member States’.
* On this basis, ‘courts’ are understood to mean all independent institutions (i.e. not subject to instructions) empowered to settle disputes in a constitutional state under due process of law
* The parties can only request it, not require it, to refer a case.The Court of Justice considers the relevance of the point solely in terms of whether the question concerned is amenable to referra

Obligation to refer
* A national court or tribunal against whose decision there is no judicial remedy in national law is obliged to refer.
* . A court obliged to refer a case may only avoid such
a referral if the question is of no material importance for the outcome of
the case before it, or has already been answered by the Court of Justice, or the interpretation of EU law is not open to reasonable doubt.
* However, the obligation to refer is unconditional where the validity of an EU instrument is at issue
* Failure to discharge the obligation to refer constitutes an infringement of the EU treaties, which may make the Member State concerned liable to infringement proceedings

Effect
* The preliminary ruling, issued in the form of a court order, is directly binding on the referring court and all other courts hearing the same case.
* In practice it also has a very high status as a precedent for subsequent cases of a like nature

81
Q

Preliminary ruling proceedings – recommendations to national courts from CJEU in 2018 - part 1: who makes request, subject matter and scope, interaction between reference and national proceedings, Expedited and urgent referrals

A

Who makes the request for a preliminary ruling?
* The national court or tribunal before which a dispute is brought takes sole responsibility for determining both the need for a request for a preliminary ruling and the relevance of the questions it submits to the CJEU.
* Courts submitting a referral should, among other things: be established by law and be permanent;have compulsory jurisdiction;
apply the rules of law; and be independent.

Subject matter and scope
* Importantly, a referral must concern the interpretation or validity of EU law. It must not concern the interpretation of national law nor issues of fact raised in the main proceedings.
* The CJEU may only give a ruling if EU law applies to the case in the main proceedings.
* The CJEU does not itself apply EU law to a dispute brought by a referring court, as its role is to help resolve it; the role of the national court is to draw conclusions from the CJEU’s ruling.
* Preliminary rulings are binding both on the referring court and on all courts in Member States.

Interaction between the reference for a preliminary ruling and the national proceedings
* A referral should be made as soon as it is clear that a CJEU ruling is necessary for a national court to give judgment and when it is able to define in sufficient detail the legal and factual context of the case and the legal issues that it raises.
* The national proceedings must be suspended until the CJEU has given its ruling.
* The referring court must inform the CJEU of any procedural step that may affect the referral and, in particular, of any discontinuance or withdrawal, or of any amicable settlement of the dispute in the main proceedings, and of any other event leading to the termination of the proceedings

Expedited and urgent referrals
* Under Articles 105–114 of its rules of procedure, the CJEU may decide that some referrals should be handled by means of expedited or urgent procedures.
* An expedited procedure where the nature and exceptional circumstances of the case require it to be handled quickly. This could arise, for example, if there is a serious and immediate danger to public health or to the environment
* An urgemt procedure applies only in cases involving questions relating to freedom, security and justice.

82
Q

Liability of the Member States for infringements of EU
law

A

History and importance:
* The liability of a Member State for harm suffered by individuals as a result of an infringement of EU law attributable to that state was established in principle by CJEU joint judgement in 1996 C-46/93 Brasserie du pêcheur and C-48/93 Factortame.
* Whilst the earlier judgments restricted the liability of the Member States to instances where individuals suffered harm as a result of failure to transpose in good time a directive granting them personal rights but not directly addressed to them, this judgment established the principle of general liability encompassing any infringement of EU law attributable to a Member State.

The liability of the Member States for infringements of EU law is defined
by three criteria that are largely the same as those applying to the EU in a similar situation.
* The aim of the EU provision that has been infringed must be to grant rights to the individual
* The infringement must be sufficiently serious, i.e. a Member State must clearly have exceeded the limits of its discretionary powers to a considerable degree. This must be decided on by the national courts,
which have sole responsibility for ascertaining the facts and assessing
the seriousness of the infringements of EU law
* A direct causal link must exist between the infringement of the
obligation on the Member State and the harm suffered by the injured
party. It is not necessary to demonstrate fault

Applicaiton:
* The Court of Justice makes it quite clear that the principles established by it for determining liability also apply to the last of the three central powers, namely the judiciary
* they may also be the subject of an action for damages for infringement of EU lawbefore the competent courts in the Member States

83
Q

Which EU acst are directly applicable?

A

List of provisions on:
* freedom to provide services Art 45 TFEU)56 TFEU
* freedom of establishment (Art 49 TFEU)
* freedom of movement (Art
* free movement of goods (Art 26 TFEU)
* equal pay for men and women (Article 157 TFEU)
* general prohibition of discrimination (Article 45 TFEU)
* freedom of competition (Article 101 TFEU)
* As regards secondary legislation, the question of direct applicability only arises in relation to directives and decisions addressed to the Member States, given that regulations and decisions addressed to individuals already derive their direct applicability from the EU treaties

84
Q

Dates of all Treaties (including day and month) and purpose and main changes

A

Treaty on EUropean Union - Maastricht Treaty
* Signed: 7 February 1992
* Entered into force: 1 November 1993
* Purpose: to prepare for European Monetary Union and introduce elements of a political union (citizenship, common foreign and internal affairs policy).
* Main changes: establishment of the European Union and introduction of the co-decision procedure, giving Parliament more say in decision-making. New forms of cooperation between EU governments – for example on defence and justice and home affairs.

SIngle European Act:
* Signed: 17 February 1986 (Luxembourg) / 28 February 1986 (The Hague)
* Entered into force: 1 July 1987
* Purpose: to reform the institutions in preparation for Portugal and Spain’s membership and speed up decision-making in preparation for the single market.
* Main changes: extension of qualified majority voting in the Council (making it harder for a single country to veto proposed legislation), creation of the cooperation and assent procedures, giving Parliament more influence.

Treaty of Amsterdam
* Signed: 2 October 1997
* Entered into force: 1 May 1999
* Purpose: To reform the EU institutions in preparation for the arrival of future member countries.
* Main changes: amendment, renumbering and consolidation of EU and EEC treaties. More transparent decision-making (increased use of the ordinary legislative procedure).

Treaty of Nice
* Signed: 26 February 2001
* Entered into force: 1 February 2003
* Purpose: to reform the institutions so that the EU could function efficiently after reaching 25 member countries.
* Main changes: methods for changing the composition of the Commission and redefining the voting system in the Council.

Treaty of Lisbon
* Signed: 13 December 2007
* Entered into force: 1 December 2009
* Purpose: to make the EU more democratic, more efficient and better able to address global problems, such as climate change, with one voice.
* Main changes: more power for the European Parliament, change of voting procedures in the Council, citizens’ initiative, a permanent president of the European Council, a new High Representative for Foreign Affairs, a new EU diplomatic service.

The Lisbon treaty clarifies which powers:
- belong to the EU
- belong to EU member countries
- are shared.

Merger Treaty:
* Signed: 8 April 1965
* Entered into force: 1 July 1967
* Purpose: to streamline the European institutions.
* Main changes: creation of a single Commission and a single Council to serve the then three European Communities (EEC, Euratom, ECSC). Repealed by the Treaty of Amsterdam.

Treaties of Rome
* Signed: 25 March 1957
* Entered into force: 1 January 1958
* Purpose: to set up the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom).
* Main changes: extension of European integration to include general economic cooperation.

Treaty establishing ECSC
* Signed: 18 April 1951
* Entered into force: 23 July 1952
* Expired: 23 July 2002
* Purpose: to create interdependence in coal and steel so that one country could no longer mobilise its armed forces without others knowing. This eased distrust and tensions after WWII. The ECSC treaty expired in 2002.

85
Q

Overseas countries and territories (OCTs)

A

Articles 198-204 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union recognise that 4 European Union countries (Denmark, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (1)) have special links with certain overseas countries and territories (OCTs).

Relations between the EU and these OCTs - all 25 of which are islands scattered around the world’s oceans - are based on EU law rather than on the constitutional law of the EU country in question. OCT nationals are EU citizens.

Under the OAD, the EU provides financial support for the OCTs’ development strategies. OCTs receive funding through the European Development Fund and are eligible for programmes funded by the EU’s general budget.

86
Q

Revision of treaties: ordinary and simplified procedure;

A

Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union. Whatever procedure is followed, EU Member States must unanimously agree on the revision of the treaty provisions concerned.

Ordinary revision procedure
* The ordinary revision procedure concerns key amendments made to the treaties, such as increasing or reducing the competences (areas of legal authority) of the EU. It works as follows.
* Any Member State government, the European Parliament or the European Commission may submit to the Council of the European Union a proposal to amend the treaties.
* The Council submits these proposals to the European Council (consisting of the Heads of State and Government of the Member States), and the national parliaments are notified.
* If the European Council decides to examine the proposed amendments, a convention will be convened by its president composed of representatives of the national parliaments, of the Heads of State or Government of the Member States, of the Parliament and of the Commission. The convention examines the proposals for amendments and shall adopt by consensus a recommendation to a conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States.
* A conference of representatives of the governments of Member States is then convened by the President of the European Council with a view to adopting by consensus the proposed amendments to the treaties
* The changes apply only after they have been ratified by all Member States.
* The European Council may also decide, after obtaining the consent of the Parliament, not to convene a convention if amendments are not of great importance.

Simplified revision procedure
* The Treaty of Lisbon creates a simplified procedure for the amendment of the EU’s internal policies and actions (Part III of the TFEU). The objective is to facilitate further European integration in these areas.
* This procedure avoids the need to convene the convention and conference of representatives.
* Amendments to the treaties only apply if they have been ratified by all Member States.
* However, the legal authority of the EU may not be extended by means of a simplified revision procedure.

Passerelle clauses: Passerelle clauses are the second simplified revision procedure.

The flexibility clause (Article 352 TFEU)

87
Q

Revision of treaties: passerelle clauses, flexbility clauses

A

Passerelle clauses: Passerelle clauses are the second simplified revision procedure.

The use of a passerelle clause means there is no need to formally amend the EU treaties and thus no requirement for this to be ratified by the EU Member States.

**The general passerelle clause (Article 48 TEU) **concerns the two following cases.
* Where the TFEU or Title V of the TEU provide for the Council to act by unanimity, the European Council may adopt a decision authorising the Council to act by qualified majority. This possibility does not apply to decisions with military implications and those in the area of defence.
* Where the TFEU provides for legislative acts to be adopted by the Council in accordance with a special legislative procedure, the European Council may adopt a decision allowing for the adoption of such an act in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.
* In both cases, the European Council can act unanimously after obtaining the consent of the Parliament. Furthermore, each national parliament has the right to object and prevent the general passerelle clause from being activated.

Specifc passerelle clauses
The EU treaties also provide for passerelle clauses which apply to six specific policy areas. These six special passerelle clauses apply in the fields of:
1. common foreign and security policy (Article 31(3) TEU);
2. family law with cross-border implications (Article 81(3)TFEU);
3. social policy (Article 153(2) TFEU);
4. environmental policy (Article 192(2) TFEU);
5. the multiannual financial framework (Article 312(2) TFEU); and
6. enhanced cooperation (Article 333 TFEU).

The conditions for adopting legislation in these areas require a less elaborate procedure if the institutions decide to apply a passerelle clause. In the first four cases, it is the Council that decides about the passerelle clauses, while in the last two it is the European Council.

The flexibility clause (Article 352 TFEU)
* This clause extends the EU’s powers where a measure appears necessary to attain one of the objectives of the treaties and where the treaties do not provide for the necessary legal authority
* Measures under this provision are adopted by the Council acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after obtaining the consent of the Parliament. They shall not involve harmonisation of Member States’ laws in areas where the treaties exclude such harmonisation.

88
Q

Merger Treaty

A
  • The Merger Treaty of 1965 merged the executive bodies of the existing European Communities into a single Commission and established a single Council of the European Communities.
  • Signed: Brussels (Belgium) 8 April 1965
  • Entered into force: 1 July 1967
89
Q

Right of initiative: EC, EP, European Council

A
  • Art 17 TEU generally grants EC right of initiative
  • Art 225 TFEU gives EP right to invite the Commission to table “any appropriate proposal on matters on which it considers that a Union act is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties’”
  • EP own right of initiative is in following cases: 1) for decisions relating to its own composition, 2) for provisions on the election of its members, 3) for the general conditions governing the performance of its members’ duties 4) for the rules governing the exercise of its right of inquiry, 5) for the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties
  • European Council summit may call on the Commission to draw up policy proposals.
  • The Council of the European Union, under Article 241 TFEU, ‘acting by a simple majority, may request the Commission to undertake any studies the Council considers desirable for the attainment of the common objectives, and to submit to it any appropriate proposals’.
  • Under Article 11 TEU and Article 24 TFEU, the citizens’ initiative allows citizens to invite the Commission to submit proposals on which they believe EU legislation should be adopted. Once an initiative has reached one million signatures from at least seven EU Member States (each country has a minimum threshold), the Commission has to decide what action to take, if any.
  • In the context of the ordinary legislative procedure, legislative proposals may also be put forward by the following: 1) a quarter of the Member States (under Article 76 TFEU), 2) the Court of Justice (under Article 257 TFEU), and 3) the European Central Bank (under Article 40 of Protocol No 4).
90
Q

Succesful citizen initiatives

A
  • Art 11 TEU, Art 24 TFEU
  • 1 million signatures and the minimum thresholds in seven EU Member States

List of succesful initiatives:
* Right2Water in 2013
* One of Us in 2014: oncerned legal protection for the dignity, right to life and integrity of every human being from conception.
* Stop Vivisection in 2015
* Ban glyphosate in 2017
* Minority Safepack in 2020
* End the Cage Age in 2020

91
Q

Withdrawal from the European Union

A
  • Art 50 TEU
  • An EU Member State wishing to withdraw must notify the European Council of its intention to do so. The European Council is then required to provide guidelines for the conclusion of an agreement setting out the arrangements for that country’s withdrawal.
  • This agreement is concluded on behalf of the EU by the Council of the European Union, acting by qualified majority, having obtained the European Parliament’s consent.
  • The EU treaties cease to apply to the country in question from the date of entry into force of the agreement, or 2 years after the notification of the withdrawal. The European Council may decide to extend that period.
92
Q

Special legislative procedure

A

Council is the only legislator, Art 289 TFEU the Council is the only legislator and the Parliament is required to either:
consent to the Commission’s proposal;
be consulted on it.

Consent procedure, and where it is used
* Under this procedure, the Parliament can accept or reject a legislative proposal by an absolute majority vote, but it cannot amend the proposal; the Council does not have the power to overturn the Parliament’s opinion.
* the adoption of certain international agreements negotiated by the EU (e..g FTAs), wiht exception of CFSP
* the accession of new EU Member States;
* a serious breach of fundamental rights, e..g Art 7 procedure
* a country wishing to withdraw from the EU

Consultation procedure:
* the Council adopts a legislative proposal only after the Parliament has provided its opinion;
* the Parliament may approve, reject or propose amendments to the Commission’s legislative proposal but the Council is not legally required to take these into account;
* Parliament is consulted in the case of a non-legislative procedure where international agreements have been negotiated under the EU’s common foreign and security policy;
* Parliament is consulted in the case of legislation in certain specific areas like competition policy (Article 103 TFEU) and harmonisation of indirect taxation (Article 113 TFEU) taxation.

93
Q

EEA Agreement

A
  • 1992, It now covers the EU countries (1) and 3 of the 4 European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries — Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.
  • Besides the 4 ‘freedoms’ (i.e. the free movement of goods, capital, services and persons) and certain aspects of other related policy areas (e.g. education, research, social affairs, consumer protection, company law and the environment), the agreement covers competition and state aid rules.
94
Q

Luxembourg Treaty

A
  • signed in 1970, EIF 1 January 1971
  • 6 original MS
  • amended the budgetary provisions of the Treaty of Rome to increase the budgetary authority of the European Parliamentary Assembly (now the European Parliament). It introduced the “own resources” system, providing the European Communities with independent financial means to support the Community budget.
  • Gave the EP the final say on non-compulsory expenditures. Compulsory spending, which includes obligations under treaties (like the Common Agricultural Policy) and international agreements, remained under Council control.
  • The treaty established the “own resources” system for funding the EC, meaning the EC could rely on independent financial means rather than on direct contributions from member states. The resources were: customs duties, agricultural levies, and a certain percentage of the value-added tax (VAT)
95
Q

Second Budgetary Treaty (brussels treaty)

A
  • When: Signed 22 July 1975, EIF 1 June 1977
  • Who: 9 MS (IT, FR, BE, NL, LX, DE + IE, DK, UK)
  • What: Certain reforms, which were necessary following the implementation of the financial system of own resources, which established the financial autonomy of the European Communities (via the Treaty of Luxembourg). further increased Parliament’s powers, allowing it to reject the entire budget.
  • establishes ECA
  • Revise the annual budgetary procedure, giving the European Parliament more powers over certain expenditure and the right to reject the European Union (EU) draft budget;
96
Q

1992 Edinburg Council

A
  • Declaration on the principle of subsidiarity & measures to increase transparency in decision making process of the Community.
97
Q

Treaty of Maastricht established which institutions and which new competencies

A
  • Establishes the ECB
  • Establishes the Committee of the Regions

New competencies:
* trans-European networks (TEN);
* industrial policy;
* consumer protection;
* education and vocational training;
* youth issues;
* culture.

Other hings established:
* * Establishment of Economic and Monetary Union
* * Officially introduced European citizenship.
* * Introduction of the co-decision procedure, reinforcing the role of the EP. Introduced QMV in new areas.
* * Principles: Conferral, subsidiarity, proportionality & objectives: peace, its values and well-being of people.
* * Expansion of European Social Fund.

98
Q

1994 EEA Agreement

A
  • The Agreement on the European Economic Area. Brings together EU Member States and the three EEA EFTA States in a single market referred to as the internal market.
  •  Members: Iceland, Lichtenstein and Norway.
99
Q

1997 Eurogroup

A

The Eurogroup is an informal body created in 1997 in which the ministers from euro area member states discuss matters relating to their countries’ common responsibilities related to the euro.

100
Q

Treaty of Amsterdam

A
    • Maintained pillar structure  brought part of third pillar (visas, asylum, immigration) into first pillar and restructured CFSP - 1. European Communities (EC, ECSC, Euratom)
      1. Common Foreign and Security Policy
      2. Police and Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters
  • Introduced possibility of suspension of certain rights if MS breaches EU values
    • European Parliament: Enhanced powers with the expanded co-decision procedure and the right to approve the Commission President.
    • European Council: Formally established to hold regular summits.
    • High Representative for CFSP: Created to coordinate foreign and security policy.
    • European Court of First Instance: Laid groundwork for the General Court.

competencies:
* o Single Market: Accelerated completion by removing remaining barriers.
* Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP): Strengthened with common strategies and the High Representative role.
* Police and Judicial Cooperation: Enhanced Europol’s role and streamlined extradition processes.
* Rights Suspension: Allowed suspension of member rights for breaches of EU values.
* Legislative Procedures: Expanded co-decision and eliminated the cooperation procedure.
* Schengen Integration: Incorporated passport-free travel into EU law.
* Employment and Social Policy: Expanded scope to include health, safety, and social dialogue.
* Sanctions: Introduced measures to suspend member rights for serious breaches.

101
Q

2002 Barcelona Council

A

focus on social issues in the European Union.
 set concrete targets in two new areas:
* * the provision, by 2010, of childcare for 90% of children aged between three and the mandatory school age and for 33% of children aged below three, in order to encourage female labour market participation;
* * achieving a progressive increase of around five years in the average actual age at which people stop working in the EU by 2010, by making continued employment more attractive for older workers.

102
Q

Charter of FUndamental RIghts procalamtaion

A

8 December 2000

103
Q

2001 Treaty of Nice changes for EC, COuncil, EP, ECJ

A

When: Signed 2001, EIF 2003
What: Institutional reform before Eastern enlargement an in response to legitimacy concerns.
Main changes:
* preventive mechanism is added in Article 7 of the TEU.

Commission:
* Composition of College changed to max 1 Cssr per country (max 27)
* President and College designated by QMV of Council
* President has increased powers over the college to distribute / reorganise responsibilities among commissioners and, with approval of the college on simple majority, to dismiss one of the commissioners.

  • Council:
  • weighting of votes is rebalanced to better reflect the relative populations of the member countries; conditions for obtaining a qualified majority are strengthened, with now 73.9%
  • Current system of QMV was introduced ( more decision areas became subject to QMV), and introduced principle of enhanced cooperation.
  • can nominate President of Commission by QMV

EP
* EPs legislative and supervisory powers were increased.
* increase of MEPs to 732
* co-decision extended to almost all areas (= more ordinary legislative procedure)
* EP can take a matter to the Court of Justice of the EU just like a member country or the Commission.

Court of Justice of the European Union is radically reformed:
* it will sit in different formations: in chambers of 3 to 5 judges, in grand chamber (11 judges) or in plenary session (1 judge per EU country);
* the competencies of the Court of First Instance (now, the General Court) are extended, namely to some categories of reference for a preliminary ruling;
* the Council acting unanimously can create subsidiary courts to deal at first instance with special areas of law, such as patents.

104
Q

2007 Treaty of Lisbon

A

When: Signed 2007, EIF 2009
What: Further reforms for larger EU, now with 28 MS. Reforms the EU’s internal and external policies, giving the EP further legislative powers, ensures greater democracy in EU decision making.
Main changes:
Commission: President is 1) chosen and elected based on the outcome of the European elections (Spitzenkandidaten) and 2) responsible for the appointment of commissioners, the distribution of their portfolios and can request an individual commissioner to resign.

Council: new majority voting rules when approving legislation  To secure a majority requires at least 55% of EU countries representing at least 65% of the EU’s population. To block a proposal, at least 4 countries have to be against (double majority)

European Parliament
* o Equal footing with Council
* OLP extended to 40 new policy areas, raising to 73 the total number where the Parliament and the Council adopt legislation on an equal footing;
* elects the European Commission President by a majority of its members
* has a maximum number of 751 members.

  • European Council: o Becomes a formal institution, and creation of a long-term President of the European Council
  • CJEU: o jurisdiction is extended to all EU policy areas except for the common foreign and security policy.
  • Creation of HRVP role: o creates the EEAS, whose staff come from the Commission, Council and national diplomatic services;
    o introduces a mutual defence clause whereby all EU countries must help each other/another EU country if it is under attack.
  • European Central Bank (ECB): o The ECB is now formally recognised as an EU institution by being listed in Article 13 TEU

Eu law:
* * Made EU charter binding and on same level as Treaties.
* * Introduced citizens’ initiative, by which not less than one million citizens (under certain condition) may invite the Commission to submit a proposal
* * gives national parliaments a greater say in EU decision making
* * distinction between legislative acts and non-legislative acts depending on their decision making-process
* * Distinguishes competences: Exclusive, Shared, Supporting.

105
Q

Positive & negative integration

A

Positive integration: harmonisation & approximation of laws and regulations through legislative process

Negative integration: abolishing barriers to the internal market/single market through the judicial process

106
Q

Economic integration - areas:

A
  1. Free trade area
  2. Customs union
  3. Common market
  4. Internal market  an area without internal frontiers in which free movement of persons, goods, services and capital is ensured (4 market freedoms)
107
Q

Political integration: areas

A
  • fundamental status of EU citizens
  • common economic and monetary policy
  • an area of freedom, security and justice
  • a common foreign and security policy
108
Q

Delegated and implementing acts voting

A

Delegated act:
* 3. Objection Procedure: After the Commission drafts the act, the Council and EP have two months to raise objections.
* * Council: If 20 MS (representing 65% of the population) object, the act is vetoed.
* EP: If the EP objects by absolute majority, the act is rejected.

Implementing act
* * Council and EP have limited involvement in implementing acts. However, the Council may adopt an implementing act in certain cases (e.g., CFSP, taxation).
* * The EP has very limited powers over implementing acts and can only object under certain conditions.

109
Q

Open method of coordination

A
  • The OMC, originally created in the 1990s as part of employment policy and the Luxembourg process, was defined as an instrument of the Lisbon strategy (2000). This was a time when EU economic integration was advancing quickly but EU countries were reticent to give more powers to the European institutions.
  • OMC provides a new framework for cooperation between MS, whose national policies can be directed towards certain common objectives  spread best practices and achieve convergence
  • Under this intergovernmental method, the EU countries are evaluated by one another (peer pressure), with the Commission’s role being limited to surveillance. The European Parliament and the Court of Justice play virtually no part in the OMC process.
  • The OMC takes place in areas which fall within the competence of EU countries, such as employment, social protection, education, youth and vocational training.

The OMC is principally based on:

  • jointly identifying and defining objectives to be achieved (adopted by the Council);
  • jointly established measuring instruments (statistics, indicators, guidelines);
  • benchmarking, i.e. comparison of EU countries’ performance and the exchange of best practices (monitored by the Commission).
110
Q

Budgetary procedure: legal basis and history

A

Legal basis:
* Article 312-324 of the TFEU and Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.
* * Articles 39 to 55 of the Financial Regulation (Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
* * Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management. In force for 2021-2027

History
* * Originally solely Council competency, the 1970 Treaty, while maintaining the Council’s right to have the last word on ‘compulsory expenditure’ resulting from Treaty obligations or from acts adopted under the Treaty, gave Parliament the final say on “non-compulsory expenditure”.
* * The 1975 Treaty gave Parliament the right to reject the budget in its entirety.
* * No substantial modifications were introduced by the Treaties until the major changes brought by the Treaty of Lisbon, which introduced a simpler and more transparent budgetary procedure (budgetary co-decision. With abolition of the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure, Parliament now has joint powers with the Council to determine overall budget expenditure
* * Under the new rules agreed in the Treaty of Lisbon, the Conciliation Committee has failed to reach an agreement on four occasions (on the 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2018 budgets).

111
Q

B

Budgetary procedure: how voting works, what happens in case of failure

A
  • For every step in the decision-making process the European Council decides by qualified majority vote.
  • The voting method of the European Parliament differs by each step, as follows: During conciliation committee, majority of EP representatives, adoption in Plenary is majority of votes cast, amendments to budget and disapproval with majority of members.

When conciliation committee doesn’t find agreement in 21 days
* the Commission is obliged to present a new draft budget
* Trilogues would continue informally, so that the Council and Parliament reach a compromise before carrying out their respective readings.
* If there is still no agreement on the EU budget by 31 December, the system of ‘provisional twelfths’ comes into force automatically as envisaged by Article 315 TFEU.
* * This means that each chapter of the budget will be funded monthly, up to a maximum of one twelfth of its appropriations of the previous year or of the draft budget, whichever is the lowest

112
Q

Budgetary control measures

A
  1. Control at national level:
    * o Initial control of revenue and expenditure is carried out to a large extent by national authorities. They have kept their powers, particularly on traditional own resource
    * o The operational expenditure of instruments falling under shared management is also scrutinised in the first instance by the Member State authorities.
  2. Internal auditors of each institution.
  3. By the European Court of Auditors: External control is carried out by national audit institutions and by the European Court of Auditors (ECA), which submits detailed reports each year to the budgetary authority in accordance with Article 287 TFEU:
  4. By European Parliament: Committee on Budgetary Control is responsible for preparing Parliament’s position
113
Q

The discharge procedure:

A

Legal basis: Art 319 TFEU

Overview:
* Once a year, on a recommendation from the Council, Parliament grants discharge to the Commission (and other institutions and bodies) in respect of the implementation of the budget for the year n-2.
* o They examine: annual activity reports of the Commission’s DGs (and of other institutions), the Commission’s annual management and performance report, the evaluation report (under Article 318 TFEU,, the ECA’s annual report and the replies from the Commission and the other institutions to Parliament’s questions (Article 319 TFEU)
* o The resulting discharge decisions are accompanied by a resolution, which contains Parliament’s observations and recommendations concerning the implementation of the budget.
* o Parliament may decide to postpone discharge where it is dissatisfied with particular aspects of the Commission’s management of the budget. Refusing to grant discharge can be regarded as tantamount to requiring the Commission to resign.
* o This threat was put into effect in December 1998: following a vote in plenary to reject the discharge motion, a group of five independent experts was established, which reported on accusations of fraud, mismanagement and nepotism against the Commission. The Commissioners then resigned en bloc on 16 March 1999.

114
Q

EP power when it comes to appointment of budgetary official

A
  • Through its relevant committees, Parliament also holds hearings of Commissioners-designate,
  • and the Committee on Budgetary Control holds hearings for Members-designate of the ECA, the candidates shortlisted for the post of Director-General of OLAF and the members of the OLAF Supervisory Committee.
  • These posts cannot be filled until the hearings have been held.
115
Q

Better regulation goals

A
  • Ensure EU policymaking is based on evidence
  • MakingEU laws simpler and better, and avoiding unnecessary burdens
  • nvolving citizens, businesses and stakeholders in the decision-making process
116
Q

Better regulation: where citizens and stakeholders can consutls

A
  • Have Your Say: Public Consultations and Feedback
    *