envi justice Flashcards

1
Q

Brockington and Igo 2006 what area relatively low eviction

A

-america, pacific, Caribbean australia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Brockington and Igo 2006 when did most eviction occur?

A

before 1980

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what more common type evition Brockington and Igo 2006

A

economic displacement and exclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

schreckenberg et al 2016 what key component EJ frame work

A

-procedure
-recognition
-distribution
-enabling conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

schreckenberg et al 2016 why is it important have a framwork for EJ?

A

-checklist ensure not missing something
-3 elements good quick reference
-easy translate minimum standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

schreckenberg et al 2016 elements recognition

A

recognise and respect:
-HR
- staturary and custimory property rights
-rights minority groups
-all actors
-no discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

schreckenberg et al 2016 components procedure EJ

A

-full and effective participation all relevant actors decision making
-clearly defined and agreed responsibility actors
-accountabilty actions
-access to justice
-transparency
-consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

schreckenberg et al 2016 components distribution EJ

A

-benefit present not compromise future
-benefits shared
-mtiigation costs com/IP
-ID and assessment costs , benefits ,risks, distribution, tradeof f

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

schreckenberg et al 2016 enabling conditions

A

-adaptive learning approach
-relevant actors awareness and capacity achieve recognition and participate effectively
-legal, political social recognition all pa gov types

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

tauli-corpuz et al 2018 issues with fortress conservation

A

-IP role protecting land
-killing
-loose livlihhod
loose cultural ID
-conflcit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

tauli-corpuz et al 2018 how much coom invest in conservation

A

US$2 billion–4 billion per year on resource management and conservation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Tauli-corpez et al 2018 how to improve cons rights

A

-monitoring and grievance mechanism
-nationally accountable reparation mechanism cons measures
-United Nations Declaration
on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples centrally placed all measure cons and biod
-strengthen and promote right based approach cons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

dawson et al 2017 how to better include equity in pa management

A

-base material distribution based standard indicator
-just look allocation land not adress precudure and recognition
-use local perception help come up solution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dawson 2017 how to achieve equity goal in conservation

A

-goal must be forefront conservation management keep on adapting to achieve include continue dialogue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mcdermott and schreckenberg 2009 are poor benefits from CF

A

-not necessarily
-befits generate community level more significant poor marginalized groups than those receive individual house hold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mcdermott and schreckenberg 2009 how to ensure the poor benefit from CF

A

-endure safeguards and receive compensation
-must be targeted
-access to decision making
-access to land and forest products
-economic development must make sure equitable
-pursue equity and ecological goals at the same time
-provide cutral training and recouses those maange forest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

zafra-callo et al 2019- how much progress has there been achi target 11 incorporating social equity into PAs

A

-currently strict PAs not enough mechanisms to ensure equity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

zafra-callo et al 2019 WHAT is challanging but must have to achieve equity in PAs

A

-effective participation decision making
-transparent procedures
-acess justice conflict situations
-recongition rights and diversity local people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what conclusion zafra-callo et al 2019 to improve equity post-2020 biod framework

A

-need to create framwork to monitor equity PAs
-must ensure manage conflict and improve action equity PAs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

kashwan 2017 why have right based approaches failed so far cons

A

economic interests states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

kashwan 2017 how to improve rights based approach cons

A

-protection minimum set rights allow forest people persist
-cons need more approaches
-local solutions speciific region setting
-hold states to account cons must enter dialogue with rights movement

22
Q

kashwan 2017 role of cons and rights

A

must take action to ensure locals given unbreakable set rights help ensure justice and cons

23
Q

how science used in traditonal conservation

A

-sc=discouse detachment, separation, agenda categories expert k, external management, central political justification for cons effort including establishment and management pas
-sc. used basis cons

24
Q

quote to show PAs =injustice martin 2020

A

pa tropic deeply unpopular with host com only possible power symmetries and framing of morality in term ‘common futures’ rather current rights or equality

25
Q

what injustice occured manadagsca creation new pas to join national parks

A

-significant burdon local households
-stopped using forst
-cost proportionaly higher poorest household
-more 50% eligable not compensated
-no one fully compensated

26
Q

how many people elible didn’t receive compensation creation PA madagasca

A

more 50%

27
Q

how was compensation pas example local level elite capture

A

households that received compensation were easily accessible, relatively well of and food secure

28
Q

what is major issue with compensation schemes

A

-only given once suffering begins
-cost start as soon as PA created take time alternative livelihood become profitable

29
Q

why are carbon ofset bad

A

-locals don’t recieve fund (RED)
-allow people carry on lives
-don’t incentivize do good
-just moving problem to somewhere else

30
Q

what EJ occured adivasis

A

India largest network PA - evict people , and restrict access

31
Q

how values relate EJ

A

must look at what is deemed valuable
-who gets to decide these values

32
Q

define EJ

A

fair treatment and meaningful involvement people in development, implementation and enforcement envi law regulations, policies
-equil protection and meaningful involvement people

33
Q

define envi racisim

A

-envi policies, practices, directives differently affect, disadvantage indivdual groups, communities race and color

34
Q

whats classic EJ

A

-local inequalties
-race, calss
-mall distribution envi externalities
-focus USA some international

35
Q

whats emerging EJ focus

A

-acknowledgment envi inequality
-demand and consumption one part world= disproportionate envi burden distant region= unequal costs
-climate justice
-3 concept- procedure, recognition distribution

36
Q

whats emerging EJ focus

A

-acknowledgment envi inequality
-demand and consumption one part world= disproportionate envi burden distant region= unequal costs
-climate justice
-3 concept- procedure, recognition distribution

37
Q

define recogntion

A

acknowledge and accept legitimacy rights , cultures, institutions and k. system all stakeholder their interest capacities , power to join and influence

38
Q

define procedure

A

inclusive and effective participation all relevant actors rules and decision making with accountability and transparency process

39
Q

define enalbing condition

A

surrounding SE , political, institutional condition, context influence actor ability gain recognition and participate benefits

40
Q

what are substansive rights

A

-life, property hea;th (need to live)

41
Q

when HR substansive rights first intigrated cons

A

1972 stolkholm convention link hr and envi protection law

42
Q

whats principle 1 stolkholm convention

A

the fundamental right to
freedom, equality and adequate conditions
of life, in an environment of a quality that
permits a life of dignity and well-being, and
[he] bears a solemn responsibility to protect
and improve the environment for present and
future generation

43
Q

what are procedual rights

A

acess to info, participation, decision making acess justice

44
Q

what was principle 10 rio decleration 1992

A

based in procedural rights- access to info, public participation, decision making, judical, administrative proceedings
-envi issues best-handled participation all concerned citizens all levels

45
Q

how IP inluded COP 15

A

recognise
‘important role and contribution IP and local com custodian biod and partners’
‘rights, k , innovation worldview and values and practices IP with their free and prior informed consent , full and effective participation decision making

46
Q

example rights being enshrined into international agreement cop15

A

article 14- hr approach must be followed
-have rights to healthy envi

47
Q

what questions could ask when alalysing madagasca pa from EJ lens

A

1)who is being effected PA
2) how was park boundary demarked?
3)who bears cost

48
Q

how to create just conservation

A

-safeguards protect local people
-must understand local injustic context larger SE conditions-
ens enables a holistic appreciation of the
implications of conservation; and a greater emphasis on recognition and effective procedural equity could ensure fairer distributive outcomes

49
Q

whats just cons martin 2017

A

-must economic benefit locals
-benifit other social goal
farir procedure and recognition
not impose external values

50
Q

tauli corpez 2018 why replace fortress cons with RBC

A

-bring justice IP, locals
-reduce conflict
-cost effective
-help climate action

51
Q

example nature having right

A

bolivia - the law of right of mother earth 2019- right mother earth to life diversity water clean, restoration

52
Q

why cons help rights

A

need cons ensure health and wellbeing com