behavour change Flashcards
what potential improve cons through citizen science seirra Leone 2016
-local help monitoring
-gain job cons
-enhance k
-increase awernes
-inentivise preserve animal not kill
larsone et al 2016 what limitation citizen science stop HWC siera Leone
-feeling scientist should be given K
-lack education not have resources participate
wilkeie et al 2016 what barriers need to be overcame to make harvesting bushmeat s.
-lack rights creating no incentive to conserve
-multispecies harvest put large body risk extinction
-wildlife cant expand meet consumer demand
-wildlife habitat lost convert agriculture
wilkie et al 2016 solution bushmeat trade
-devolve rights
-provide other insurances don’t need rely wildlife time stress
-livestock, fish farming
-wildlife ranching
-try encourage eating r select
confiscate illegal species
increase enforcemtn
sayer 2009 how to integrate cons and development
-work larger spatial scales eg landscape and catchment
-listen learn engage stakeholders
-explore scenarias
-ID indicators
-not as much emphasis formal planning
-base cons plans desighed outcomes not percieced threats
-set realistic goals biod
-chose learders right qualities
why shouldnt have to much formal planning
-lock path to early
-plans can mask realities
-need focus solutions not blue prints
nilsson et al 2016 what are main ways you can change behavour cons
-intigrate cons and livlyhood goal (-economic value)
-provide reward in return cons behavour (benefits outweigh costs)
-give com control natural resorces (authority manage s)
nillson what stratagie for behavour change is there little evidence it acturly works
Education
cleoncon 2021 how to improve sustainablity in cons
-more reserach public values cons(try encourage increased funding)
-more honest what private sector can do for cons- more funding, subsadies farms
-limit multilateral buddon sharing- may not generate enough money , should be able top up with voluntary contrubtions
cleoncon 2021 what is the understanding of sustainability and cons
-foucs neo-liberal market rational cons
-lots different meaning biod and s.
-public think s. = biod where as gov just econocic
clepcon how must understanding s change
-must go beyond purely economic focuses
whats rational chiece theory behavour (st john et al 2013)
-maximise utility
-well defined preferences
-choose prefered option
whats theory planned action
behavior intention predicted attitude subject to norm
what theory planned behavour
actions based on attitude , norm, and control behavior
how soc impact individual (st john et al 2013)
institutions, rules , norms
three methods encorage cons
-carrot
-stick
-destraction
whats destraction
provide alternative so non destructive options more appealing
what conditionality
only recieve benefit from improved cons outcomes
what two components enforcement
-how likely caught
-the size of penalty
whats impact of changing livelihoods for cons
ambigous effect some pos some neg
why is disrupting existing institutions dangerous
crowd out exisitng motivations cons
what two techniques researching behavour in cons
-randomised response technique
-experimental games
cooney et al 2017 what ways are there to reduce illegal wildlife trade
-increase benfit wildcons(rights, pes, benefit com, accountabilty)
-DECREASE COST LIVING WILDLIFE
-REDUCE NEFITS ENGAGING iwt (increase detection snares, reduce oftake)
-increase cost engage IWR
what must combine stop IWT cooney et al 2017
enforcement and community measures
gardner et al 2015 why did charcoal production increase in protected areas madagasca
-lack of alternative livelihoods due change rain pattern
-degradation of irrigation infrastructure
-used to supliment income
-saftey net
gardner et al 2015 how to reduce charcoal producution madagasca
-find livlihood alternatives
-improve irrigation
-climate adaption programs farms
-reduce need charcoal efficient stoves
-monitoring programs
sunderlin et al 2005 hoe forest used cons
-forest prevent further deteration into pov
-scarcity forest could increase value forest = income
sunderlin 2005 can forest help pov allivation
possibly
-need more research effects as difficult achieve win win solutions , look all factors , and potential outcomes
in madagsca is evidence boserupian hypothesis pollini 2012
no- farmers not inovating despite high pressures , external pressures make hard to inovate and erosion social capital
but some areas right conditions have intensified = depend on context
-just general unlikly work all conditions
woodhouse et al 2022 what needed for cons = human dev
–not exlude people pas
-link local values an biod together, provide alternative livlyhoods
-comp not important need recognise local and socail practices
5meaningful participaion, quality goc, rights
-secure tenure rights vital cons
