ELECTIONS AND REFERENDUMS KEY POINTS Flashcards
Functions of Elections
- Provide representation
- Help form governments
- Enables participation of voters and education
- Provide governments with legitimacy
- Promote accountability of government.
Please note in all future UK elections a full ID will be required to vote in elections, certain ID cards like bus passes for students in FT education will NOT be accepted. It is estimated 1 million voters could be lost as a result of these changes.
Positive features of UK elections.
- Gives people a say (a choice)
- Representative
- Democracy
- Elections are free and fair
- FPTP is effective
- Educates public
- Not just general elections but local, EU, mayoral, etc.
- Corruption is rare
Negative features of UK elections.
Two party system =
- No choice
- Problem of safe/marginal seats (all votes not equal)
- Better funded parties do best.
FPTP =
- Is unfair especially on smaller parties, low turnout, so most governments in power by less than 30% of population
- elective dictatorship.
Safe and marginal seats.
A safe seat is a constituency where one party almost always wins e.g. Liverpool Walton for Labour (Labour won 8.5% of vote in 2019).
A marginal seat regularly changes hands e.g. Watford (alternates between labour and the Conservatives) or Richmond Park (alternates between Conservative and Lib Dem)
Arguments in Favour of FPTP (also known as majoritarian representation)
a) Easy to understand, simple and quick (no horse trading)
b) Usually delivers strong, stable government (but not in 2010)
c) Strong link between voters and constituency MP
d) Keeps out extremist parties
(e) clear accountability – if government is poor it’s voted out)
(f) AV rejected in referendum – PR is unpopular
Disadvantages of FPTP
a) Most MPs do not have an absolute majority (of support) in their constituency, and governments don’t normally have this either (no government since 1931 has had over 50% of the vote),
b) Results are not proportional. Small parties generally do badly,
c) Large number of wasted votes, problem of safe seats – only voters in marginal seats are important.
d) Encourages tactical voting which is undemocratic. All votes should be equal.
Supplementary Vote
- Used for London Mayor and other Mayors and Police and Crime Commissioners
- Voter has 1st/2nd choice.
- If no-one gets 50% votes, all but top two candidates drop out and 2nd choice votes are redistributed until one of the remaining candidate’s get 50% of vote.
- In 2021 London Labour’s Sadiq Khan achieved 55.2% of the vote against Conservative Sean Bailey’s 44.8% after two rounds of voting.
- However, in 2021 I Greater Manchester, there was no second round as Labour’s Andy Burnham obtained 67.3% of first round votes against Conservative Laura Evan’s 19.6% of first round votes.
- Please note as of 2025/6 England’s directly elected mayors and PCC’s in England and Wales will be elected by FPTP and not SV.
Supplementary Vote - PROS
- Simple
- Fairer than FPTP
- Penalises extreme parties
- Less tactical voting
- Winning candidate can claim to have an overall majority of support.
Supplementary Vote - CONS
- Compromise candidate tends to win after 2nd choices counted
- Not very proportional.
Against Referendums:
- Politicians should decide,
- Low turnout reduces legitimacy,
- Media makes issues emotional,
- Can become an opinion poll on popularity of government
- Too much power to wealthy groups who can distort the debate.,
- Voters may not understand the complexity of the issue (eg Brexit?)
- Can represent the ‘tyranny of the majority’,
- Some issues cannot have a simple yes/no answer (eg 2011 on AV).
AMS
- Scottish Parliament
- Welsh Assembly
- Greater London Assembly.
- Voters get two votes
- One for constituency candidate (by FPTP) and the second for a party (using the party list system).
- Party list is used to ‘top up’ the constituency results and achieve fairness and proportionality.
AMS - PROS
- Good compromise between FPTP and PR
- Smaller parties win seats
- Gives voters 2 votes so more choices
- Preserves constituency link
AMS - CONS
- Creates two types of MP (one more legitimate than other)
- Less democratic because party chooses who goes on the list
- Can result in a minority or coalition government
- Having 2 votes can confuse voters.
STV
- Northern Ireland Assembly
- Northern Ireland MEPs.
- Voters rank candidates in numerical order with successful candidates getting a certain quota of votes in multi-member constituencies (the way the quota is calculated is known as the Droop Formula).
STV - PROS
- Very proportional
- Works well in N. Ireland
- Helps smaller parties
- Leads to coalitions (good or bad?)
- Voters get a wide choice of candidate( 6 representatives per constituency)
- Can choose to vote for candidates from different parties
- Every vote is of equal value.