Democracy & Participation: Key Points 2022 - 2023 Flashcards
Democracy
- people power
- decisions are made by the people
- the government is accountable to the people
- all are equal
- there is freedom of information
- began in ancient Greece (Athens)
Legitimacy
- government has a right to power in a democracy (because of elections)
- regime in Iran claims legitimacy because of Islamic teachings
Direct democracy
- people (not politicians) actively make decisions themselves (eg. referendums, initiatives, citizens’ juries, Athenian democracy)
- not an election
- 2015 Recall of MP’s Act
Direct democracy (PROS)
- disperses power away from professional politicians
- increases participation and debate
- ‘pure’ democracy
- increases legitimacy of decisions
- more information available (internet) so voters are better informed
- less confidence in politicians
- all votes count equally (unlike First Past The Post)
Direct democracy (CONS)
- issues too complex for people to understand
- often an emotional response from voters (often made worse by media)
- too much power to wealthy groups who can distort the debate
- tyranny of majority
- politicians are experts, let them decide
- low turnout reduces legitimacy
- can become an opinion poll on popularity of government
- impractical in a large heavily populated state
Representative democracy
Politicians are elected to represent voters
Features of representative democracy
- free and fair elections
- representatives are accountable
- representatives sit in legislation and represent the voters
- there are political parties and pressure groups to represent people
Representative democracy (PROS)
- more practical than lots of referendums
- government by ‘experts’
- that’s what we elect politicians for
- representatives are accountable so usually act responsibly
- representatives can act for the benefit of whole of society
Representative democracy (CONS in the UK)
- FPTP means parties are not fairly represented
- Lords are unelected
- small parties do badly
- possibility of an elective dictatorship
- rule by elites
- whips distort democracy
- mad for minorities
- reduces participation
Features of Liberal Democracy
- frequent and fair elections
- power is separated so no-one becomes too powerful (elective dictatorship)
- checks and balances (each branch controls the power of others)
- strong civil liberties (e.g. freedom of speech)
- diversity and tolerance
independent judiciary
Features of Pluralist Democracy
- frequent and fair elections
- power is separated so no-one becomes too powerful (elective dictatorship)
- checks and balances (each branch controls the power of others)
- strong civil liberties (e.g. freedom of speech)
- diversity and tolerance
independent judiciary - lots of different political parties and pressure groups
- power is widely dispersed (not concentrated, e.g. devolution)
- government makes decisions having listened to the ideas and contrasting arguments from competing groups and organisations
Features of Parliamentary Democracy
THIS IS THE UK
- frequent and fair elections
- power is separated so no-one becomes too powerful (elective dictatorship)
- checks and balances (each branch controls the power of others)
- strong civil liberties (e.g. freedom of speech)
- diversity and tolerance
independent judiciary - lots of different political parties and pressure groups
- power is widely dispersed (not concentrated, e.g. devolution)
- government makes decisions having listened to the ideas and contrasting arguments from competing groups and organisations
- parliamentary is sovereign (has ultimate power)
- Government is drawn from Parliament (all Ministers are MPs or peers)
People participate by:
- voting
- joining a party
- joining a pressure group
- standing for election
- making views known (e.g. letter writing / internet)
Is there a participation / legitimacy crisis?
LOW TURNOUT
- turnout in 2019 was 67% up from low point of 51% in 2001, but still well below 84% in 1950
FALLING PARTY MEMBERSHIP
- except Labour at first under Corbyn but then fell away, Greens and SNP)
- disillusionment with politicians
Causes of a participation / legitimacy crisis:
- behaviour of politicians (e.g. expenses scandal)
- media influence
- consensus politics (‘all the same’?)
- FPTP
- cultural changes in society
- declining community spirit
Positive aspects of UK democracy
- free parties and variety of pressure groups
- government has a clear mandate to govern
- strong rights
- independent judiciary
- MPs represent constituents
- free media
- referendums
Democratic deficit
A deficiency or problem in the ay democracy works (e.g. poor accountability)
Negative aspects of UK democracy
- Lords are unelected
- elective dictatorship (government too strong, Parliament too weak)
- EU too powerful?
- FPTP
- small parties are under-represented
- low turnout in elections
- party membership declining (except Greens and SNP)
- disillusionment amongst voters
- lack of protection for citizens’ rights
- powerful media controlled by wealthy elite
Possible improvements to democracy:
- elected Lords
- introduce a codified constitution
- BREXIT might bring more subsidiarity
- more devolution for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
- reducing MPs to 600
- introduced PR
- strengthening power of Parliament
- ‘re-calling’ MPs who are failing
- votes at 16
- compulsory voting
- more referendums
- digital democracy
- citizens’ juries
Widening of the franchise (vote)
1832 Great Reform Act
- got rid of ‘rotten boroughs’
- new urban areas got seats
- gave vote to male middle class
1918
- all men over 21
- all women 30
1928
- all over 21
1969
- all over 18
Suffragists
- mainly middle class
- believed in non-violent persuasion (peaceful demonstrations, petitions)
Suffragettes
- working class and middle class
- militant tactics (e.g. hunger strikes)
Extend vote to 16?
HISTORY
- ‘Votes at 16 Coalition’ was formed in 2013 to press for change
- success in Scottish independence in 2014, and for Scottish Parliament elections in 2015
- Conservatives opposed so no change for UK general elections
Extend vote to 16?
YES
- can marry, leave school, start work
- would increase participation
- parties would need to pay attention to the youth issues