DR - 5 - Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Burden of proof

A

Lies with C. Each fact must be proved unless it is admitted by the opponent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Contributory negligence

A

Burden of proof falls on D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Exception?

A

D in civil has been convicted of a relevant criminal offence. Burden of proof is reversed. D argue they should not have been convicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Standard of proof

A

Balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Part 32

A

Witness-
Must serve witness statement on other parties setting out facts which witness would be allowed to orally rely on.
Inadmissable not included.
If not served only with courts permission which is rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Written witness Summary

A

If person unable to attend.
Party applies to court without notice -
Witnesses name and address
Evidence the witness can provide
Matters on which the witness would be questioned at trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Formalities of witness summary under CPR 32.

A

(a) The statement should be headed with the title of the proceedings and details such as the
name of the witness, the number of the statement and the date in the top right hand corner.
(b) In the opening paragraph should be the witness’s address, their occupation or
description, whether the statement is made as part of their employment or business and,
if so, the name of the business and whether they are a party to the proceedings.
(c) The paragraphs must be numbered with all numbers, including dates, being expressed
as figures and not words, thus, ‘five people’ should read ‘5 people’. The format for dates
would be, for example, 16 January 2022 and not 16.01.2022.
(d) The statement should normally follow the chronological sequence of the events.
(e) The function of the witness statement is to set out in writing the evidence that the
individual wants to provide on behalf of the party that called them. Historically, such
evidence was given orally at the trial but now, to save time, the witness statement usually
replaces this.
(f) Consequently, it should be written in the first person and expressed in the witness’s own
words as far as possible.
(g) The witness must also indicate which of the statements are made from their own
knowledge and which are based on information and belief, naming the source if
appropriate. Also, the process by which the witness statement was prepared must be
included, for example, face to face or over the telephone with a party’s solicitor.
(h) Any documents that are attached are formally exhibited, for example, ‘AP1’.
(i) Under PD 32 para 20.2, it must be verified by a statement of truth in the format:
‘I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that
proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes
to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an
honest belief in its truth’.
Unlike statements of case, a witness statement cannot be signed by a legal
representative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Directions for exchange

A

Simulatenously.
After disclosure and inspection of documents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Use at trial

A

Take oath or affirm.
Cross-examination
Cannot add to it without permission from the court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Affidavit

A
  • In front of solicitor (not own)
  • Mostly used in freezing injunction or search order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Relevance

A

Irrelevant material is in-admissable.
In dispute
The facts which are not admitted or denied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Opinion

A

General rule - Opinion evidence is not admissable.
BUT
s3(2) Civil Evidence Act 1972 - if made as a way of conveying facts personally perceived.
CANNOT
Draw a conclusion
An expert may give their opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hearsay

A

S1(2) of the Civil Evidence Act 1995
- a statement made outside court
-which is repeated in court
-to prove the truth of the matter stated.
Can be relevant fact or admissible opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Multiple?

A

Multiple when relayed through more than one person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Procedure?

A

Notice requirements when relying on hearsay-
-Serve the other party with the statement
-OPP then decides whether to ask court to order the original maker of statement attend for cross-examination or serve notice of intention to attack the credibility of the hearsay evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If party is not attending?

A

Serve hearsay notice - served at same time as witness statement
- OPP can still apply to court to make statement maker attend or serve notice of intention to attack credibility

17
Q

Failure to comply with requirements?

A

Failure may be taken into account when assessing weight given to it

18
Q

Weight given to statement

A
  • What issue does it address
    -How important is the issue
  • Other evidence available on issue?
    -More probative than other evidence that can be obtained by reasonable endeavours?
19
Q

Statutory safeguards S4 Civil Evidence Act 1995

A
  • reasonable for party to attend (are they dead etc..)
  • contempareously made statement?
  • dangers of multiple hearsay
  • motive to conceal or misrepresent
    -collusion, edited or collaboration
    -preventing proper evaluation (notice given late)

OPP may attack weight under these.

20
Q

Expert evidence

A

Court will restrict to that which is reasonably required to resolve the issues.
- refusing any at all
-limiting
-directing to agree on experts
-limiting to written reports.

Must obtain permission at directions stage (fast-track) or management conference (multi-track).

Proportionality and costs used to assess

21
Q

Information required?

A
  • name of expert
    -field of expert
    -knowledge and experience
    -issues they will address

Opinion allowed s3(1)

22
Q

Expert duty

A

Unbiased opinions, duty to court overrides

Not to assume role of advocate.
S13 Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 - reasonable care and skill to party who has instructed them.

23
Q

Single Joint Expert

A
  • it is proportionate
  • more speedily and cost-effectively
    -likely a range of expert opinion

If no agreement court will choose.
Fast-track normally written to increase speed.

24
Q

Separate experts

A
  • Multi-track more common (amount, importance and complexity)

Further directions to speed up process-
Deadline for exchange
Questions (within 28 days) put written questions to expert for clarification in report.

Discussion - different experts without prejudice and parties narrow down issues together.

After this written joint statement - points of agreement and disagreement to both parties

Court will then decide if oral evidence required (usually is in Multi-Track).

25
Q

Formalities Part 35 (Expert Report)

A

Must
- address the court
- give details of qualifcations
- literature or material relied on
-set out substance of all facts and instructions
-say who carried out experiments, measurements tests
-if range of opinion summarise and reasons for own opinion
-summary of conclusions
-Part 35 complied with and statement saying they understand duty to the court.

26
Q

Effect of breach

A

If serious not allowed
- If not (same as before) judge will decide weight given to evidence.

27
Q

Ethics

A

Instructions not privileged.
- Inspection and scrutinisation of instruction may be ordered if reasonable grounds suggest inaccuracy.