Contract 6 - Termination Flashcards

1
Q

Right to terminate future performance?

A

Serious breach of an innominate term
-affirm the contract
-discharge the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mitigate loss

A

Still a duty to mitigate loss - e.g. getting other quote etc..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Frustration?

A

Supervening event or circumstances must-
-make performance of the contract impossible, or radically different.
-be something beyond the ordinary risks that parties can be treated as having taken on board
-be something that was beyond the control of either party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

‘Radically different’

A
  • Government intervention
    -Unavailability of a specific person crucial to the contract
  • illegality
    -destruction of the subject matter
    -non-occurrence of a fundamental event.
    In all cases; a question of degree.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Delay?

A

-whether there are contractual provisions for delay
-the likely length of delay relative to the duration of the contract
-any time set in the contract for the obligations to be performed
-whether the performance resumed is radically different from the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Examples?

A

-Suez canal (unless it specified that route not frustrated.
-Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr (1918) - first world war.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

‘Force majeure’ clause

A

No need for doctrine of frustration- when parties specified an exceptional circumstance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Something beyond the control of either party.

A

Cannot be either parties fault.
The Super Servant Two (1990)-
parties own actions of choosing a specific oil rig.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consequences of frustration

A

Contract terminated automatically. All parties released from their future obligations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Recovering money already paid?

A

Law reform (Frustrated Contracts) Acts 1943-
-money paid before the event can be recovered
-money that should have been paid before the event need not be paid.
-At the court’s discretion expenses incurred by the payee can be recovered out of the total sums paid/payable before the event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

One party conferred a benefit?

A

Court may order a just sum to be paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Discharge by performance

A

Doctrine of complete performance - pay when performance is completed fully and exactly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exceptions

A

-Divisible obligations
-Substantial performance
-Wrongful prevention
-Voluntary acceptance of part peformance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Divisible obligations

A

Agreed to specific payment for each distinct part of stage of the contract. Each part treated like a separate contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Substantial performance

A

Cost of rectifying not more than 1/14 of the contract price a court is likely to accept the work that has been substantially performed.
Completed the work but slightly defective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wrongful prevention

A

Party wrongfully prevented from completing their contractual obligations they will be entitled to damages or a reasonable sum in restitution.
If terminated falling short of a serious breach.

17
Q

Remember!

A

S13 SGSA 1982 - business to business work will be carried out with reasonable care and skill (innominate term).

18
Q

Voluntary acceptance of part performance

A

If other party voluntarily accepts party carrying out work is entitled to a reasonable sum for what they have done.
Other party must have a genuine choice.

19
Q

Sumpter v Hedges (1898)

A

Defendant did not have a choice other than to finish building work. Builders claim for reasonable sum failed.

20
Q
A