DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY - CHILDHOOD Flashcards

1
Q

Whats the memory span in childhood according to dempster?

A

Examined numbe of items able to recall from a list
2yrs =2-3 items
4yrs =4 items
10yrs =6 items

Digits span more than doubles over lifespan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Whats some conclusion behind the dempster study?

A

Older children
- process information faster in general
- more familiar with number
- use memory strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did deloache et al study?

A

Hid a doll under one of several different objects
Waited several minutes before allowed to retrieve doll
2 yrs used strategists of pointing and maiming object to aid memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did wellmann et al find?

A

Hid object under one of 3 identical cups
3yr olds used strategies: watching, naming, pointing to correct cup
2yr olds did no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who were the two people that studies memory stateries in childhood?

A

Deloache et al
Wellman et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did flavell et al study?

A

20, - 5,7,10 yr olds show 7 pics, experimenter pointed to 3
15 secs later pointed to same 3 pics in the same order
In rehearsal - all 10 yrs, only half 7yrs and 10% of 5yrs were accurate
All children who rehearse were more accurate then. Non - rehearse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Hagen et al find?

A

5 yrs can rehearse if taught
Taught to rehearse = perform better
But still not as good as olden children - process information faster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Carr et al find?

A

5 yr olds less likely to use organisation strategy than 10 yr olds

Children using organisation remember better
Younger children who use organisation do so inconsistently (like
rehearsal)

•4 yr olds can be taught organisation, and show improvement
But don’t often use it in other situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did chi find about knowledge during childhood?

A

Compared 10yr old chess experts and adult chess novices:
1) Chess memory task
2) Digit span
Adults outperformed children on digit span
10 yr olds outperformed adults on chess task
Knowledge enables child to outperform adults despite disadvantages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Schneider et al find about cognitive development?

A

Compared child and adult chess experts at chess task. Performed equally: child’s cognitive limitations are not importan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain self identity for early childhood to childhood?

A

Simple to differentiated = i am to i am good at certain stuff

Inconsistent to consistent = self changeable according to circumstance and to self more stable and underlying to dispositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain peer relationships according to Ellis, rogoff and Cromer?

A

Observed children in different age groups to establish their companions

Spend most time with other other children by age 2-3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when does the opportunity for peer relationships increase?

A

Entry to school increases social skills in childhood and enables the child to select peers with whom they’re gonna interact with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did kindermann study about social development in peer relationships?

A

9-10 year olds
- at start of the year they were grouped according to level of academic motivation
- at end of year = group membership changed but groups of motivational levels remain the same

  • showing how children of same mindset seek each other out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain peer group acceptance?

A

Diff children form diff types of relationships and its based on acceptance

  • measured on how much children would play with certain children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did doge, coie, dodge and coppotelli study?

A

Identified 3 main kinds of acceptance depending on profiles for each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What were the three types of profiles for the acceptance according to dodge et al?

A

Popular = happy, attractive, cooperative
Rejected = disruptive, argumentative, uncooperative
Neglected = shy, not assertive, solitary

18
Q

Who looked at whether peer groups rejection could later lead to social maladjustment?

A

Kupersmidt et al.

19
Q

What did kupersmidt et al study?

A
  • compared accepted, rejected and neglected children from ages 11-18
  • there was issues like truancy, suspension and police
  • all measures least for accepted and greatest for rejected
20
Q

Explain the truancy for a rejected child from friendship groups?

A

Truancy 2x more likely than average
Police incident 3x more likely than average

21
Q

Explain the neglected children from friendship groups?

A

No different from average

22
Q

Explain the casual cause for rejection arrow chart?

A
  1. Deviant behaviour like agression
  2. Low acceptance
  3. Deviant socialisation
  4. Maladjusted outcomes like crime
23
Q

Explains he incidental factor for rejection arrow chart?

A
  1. Underlying characteristics like family problem
  2. Deviant behaviour like agression = this could lead to low acceptance
  3. Maladjusted outcomes like crime
24
Q

Explain Woodward and Ferguson study/ argue?

A
  • longitudinal study
  • argued that there’s is support for both theories
  1. Rejection predicts relationships problems = causal theroy
  2. Low iq predicts underachievement = incidental theory
25
Whats the theory for causal?
Rejection predicts relationship problems
26
Whats the theory for indicental theroy?
Low IQ predicts underachievement
27
Whats moral development?
The end product of socialisation is an individual who can distinguish right from wrong and is prepared to act accordingly - someone behaves in pro or antisocial way depdent on moral development
28
What is Piaget intrested in about moral development?
Interested in how children actively construct moral Proposed theroy of moral development
29
Who proposed the theory of moral development?
Piaget
30
What method did Piaget do for moral development theory?
Clinical interview methods Asked questions about 1. Rules in children’s games 2. Interpretations of Paris of stories Asked diff age groups in order to chart progression - marbles games = Piaget joined in and asked where do these rules come from
31
What did Piaget find about premoral (up to 4yrs) for moral development?
- no understadnign of rules or right and wrong - random choice of who is naughtier in story pairs - marbles games = make up rules as you go
32
What did Piaget find about moral realism for (4-10 yrs) for moral development?
Actions judged according to objective damage done - do not take accounts intentions - rules made by authority and are inflexible - rights and wrongs determined by rules alone
33
What did Piaget find about moral subjectivism ( from 10 yrs)?
- actions judged according to intentions not amount of damage - rules are arbitrary agreements which can be changed - rights and wrong are determined by moral principles
34
What did moral subjectivism form?
Concept of fairness, justice and authority
35
Describe Piaget as a psychologist, nay critism?
Very influential Useful description how how child and adult morality differs Critism - story pairs very log and complex for lung children, not related to child’s own experiences - assumes no further moral development after middle childhood
36
What did kohlberg do?
Extended and refined Piaget theory - assess subjects responses to moral dilemmas at interviews Examined respondedents justification on wether certain scenarios are right or wrong
37
What was the three broad levels kohlberg created?
1. Pre- conventional level = not judge morality as social conventions 2. Conventional level = judge morality as social conventions 3. Principled level = judge morality in terms of general principles
38
Explain pre- conventional morality?
Morality is obedience to authority Simialr to moral realism by Paige’s Like if Heinz lets his wife die he will get in trouble
39
Explain conventional morality?
Judgements become based on intentions rather than outcomes Simialr to Piaget moral subjectivism Actions judged according to rules in social group Like Heinz shouldn’t steal because stealing is always wrong
40
Explain principled morality?
Accept laws in society but give precedence to fundamental ethical principles e.g. “Heinz should steal the drug because if he doesn’t, he is putting a greater value on property than on human life”
41
What’s some critism of kohlberg?
Focused too much on moral and justice Only wrongdoings not pro social behaviour