SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY - ATTRIBUTION Flashcards

1
Q

Whats anthropomorphism?

A

Anthropo - human
Morph - form

Explaination of events by attributing human characteristics such as thoughts and language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Whats heiders theory of naive psychology?

A

Humans tend to explain behaviour in terms of intentions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Whats the 3 principles of heider?

A
  1. Own behaviour has purpose so assume others will also have intentions
  2. Predicting what will happen next means we can responsd appropriately so searching for causes and anticipation is useful
  3. All aspects of another person needs to be determined so may evaluate them.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The 2 attributions of heiders 3 principles theory?

A

Dispositional attribution - internal -clumsy careless
Situational attribution - external - evil colleagues, late

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What theory did jones and Davi’s do?

A

Theory of correspondent inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Whats the theory of correspondent inference?

A

Predictable people make lie easier and leave us more inc on troll so we correspond their behaviour to an edging feature of them such as their personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Whats the 5 sources of information in the theory of correspondent inference?

A
  1. Was their behaviour freely chosen?
    2, was the behaviour socially desirable?
  2. Can we infer personalism?
  3. Were there non-common effects?
  4. Did the behaviour have hedonic relevance?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Whats the evidence for jones and Harris?- student speech choices?

A

Freely chosen + ‘dicey’ topic = correspondent inference

Limitations = unintentional behaviour can be strong basis for correspondent inference
People don’t pay attention to behaviours that don’t happen - so can’t work out if something has non-common effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Whats the Kelley’s covariation model?

A

3 types of information is used
1. Consistency
2. Distinctiveness
3. Consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain Kelley’s consistency for covariation model?

A

If the person only occasional behaves like this and its not linked to a particular situation it suggests there is something else externally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain distinctiveness in Kelley’s covariation model?

A

If this person generally behaves like this then this is down to something internal to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain consensus in Kelley’s covariation model?

A

Is this what most people would do in a similar circumstance? If not then it is internal to this person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Critism of Kelley’s attribution theory?

A

People under use consensus information.
Co-variation (correlation) is a naïve mechanism
If covariation does exist multiple observations are
required to form any attribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Whats Kelley’s reply to criticisms?

A

He described causal schemata to cover how some
attributions are made from a single observation
At least two kinds of cause may interact to form an effect
(‘multiple necessary cause’ schema)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happens in labelling our emotions?

A

Immediate stimulus
Bodily response
Appraisal of context
Subjective emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain attributing emotions?

A

Cognitive awareness of the source of an emotion means that therapy can allow reassignment of arousal
Eg anger, anxiety

17
Q

What throes did wiener do?

A

Attributional theory

18
Q

Whats attributional theory?

A

Success or failure of attributions
- locus, stability and controllability

19
Q

What are the indivudlas differences in attribution?

A

Some people favour internal attributions and others favour external
Some always see failure as their fault and success as luck
Some see success as their hard works and failure as bad luck

20
Q

Whats the three points in attribution theory and relationships?

A

Formation - make thoughtful attributions
Maintenance - use persona schema we’ve formed
Dissolution - attribute blame/ excuse them

21
Q

Who did the Castro experiment?

A

Jones and Davi’s

22
Q

What happened in the Castro experiment?

A

Student gave speeches that were pro or anti Castro
Particpants told: students chose topic or were assigned it

23
Q

Whats outcome bias?

A

Peoples behaviour has an outcome for others = people intend these outcomes

24
Q

Whats actor - observer

A

We make dispostional rather then situational attributions for others but not for self - we need to take inot account the nature of the behaviour involved)

25
Whats perceptual focus?
Actors can’t see their own behaviour they see their background situation
26
Whats informational differences?
Actors have more information about themselves and how they typically behave
27
Whats false consensual effect?
Describes how individuals frequently overestimate how much others share their beliefs, values and behaviours .
28
Why is there false consensus effect?
Our own views are more salient then anyone else’s Surrounded by simialr other means same information circulating Self-justify own views by saying they are representative
29
What is self-serving biases?
Bias to assist self-esteem - credit internal assigned (self-enhancing) Blame externally assigned (self-protection)
30
Why do we do self-serving biases?
Success results from effort so people associate personal striving with success Failure tends to be unintentional so if it happens it is not associated with personal motive
31
Whats the self- handicapping?
relates to winter = protection of sense of personal ability with reference to external attributes for poor performance