Day 9: Sexual Offences all Flashcards
What must be proved in all cases of sexual violation?
- There was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant
AND
- The complainant did not consent
AND
- The offender did not believe the complainant was consenting OR
- if he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable
What must occur to be able to charge with rape?
Penetration must occur without the complainant consent, and without the defendant believing on reasonable grounds that the complainant was consenting
What 3 ways can sexual connection occur?
- Penetration of the complainants genitalia or anus
- Connection between the defendants mouth or tongue and the defendants genitalia or anus
- Connection between the complainants mouth or tongue and the defendants genitalia or anus
Definition of sexual violation:
The act of a person who
(1) rapes another person
(2) has unlawful sexual connection with another person
Sexual connection means:
Section 2 interpretation
(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, (otherwise than for genuine medical purposes)
(i) a part of the body of another person
(ii) an object held or manipulated
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or (b)
How to prove penetration?
- The complainants evidence
- Medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA
- The defendants admissions
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproductive organs, interior and exterior, they include the vulva and labia both internal and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
Penis:
The male reproductive organ. It forms part of the male genitalia, the legislation encompasses trans-gender individuals
Section 127 Crimes Act (Presumption of age):
There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of their age
What must the crown prove in terms of ‘consent’?
- The complainant did not
consent (a subjective test)
AND
- The offender did not
believe the complainant
was consenting (a
subjective test)
OR
- If he did believe she was
consenting, the grounds
for such a belief were not
reasonable (objective test)
Define consent:
A persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
R v Cook
To be effective, consent must be “real, genuine or true consent, and that it may be conveyed by words, conduct or both”
R v Cox
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed…freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement”
Explain reluctant consent:
(R v Herbert)
True consent may be given reluctantly and regretted afterwards but if consent is given even in such a manner, provided it is without fear of force or actual/threatened force, then the act of sexual connection would not be rape.
Explain the subjective and objective tests in terms of consent:
Subjective: Absence of consent
Objective: Reasonable grounds for belief in consent