Day 2: Serious Assaults Flashcards
Wounding with Intent (1)
Section and Elements
Section 188 (1)
- With intent to cause GBH
- To any person
- Wounds, maims, disfigures or causes GBH
- To any person
Wounding with Intent (2)
Section and Elements
Section 188 (2)
- With intent to injure any
person or - With reckless disregard
for the safety of others - Wounds, maims,
disfigures or causes GBH - To any person
Intent meaning:
Intent means that act must be done deliberately. More than involuntary or accidental
GBH meaning:
Harm that is really serious
Maims meaning:
Deprive the victim of the use of a limb or one of the senses. Needs to be some degree of permanence.
Disfigures meaning:
To deform or deface; to mar or alter the figure or appearance of a person
Doctrine of transferred malice:
Not necessary that the person suffering the harm was the intended victim. He is still criminally responsible under the doctrine of transferred malice, despite the wrong target being struck.
R v Taisalika
Intent
The nature if the blow and the gash it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent
R v Collister
Intent
Circumstantial evidence from which an offenders intent may be inferred can include:
- the offenders actions and words before, during and after the event
- the surrounding circumstances
- the nature of the act itself
DPP V SMITH
GBH
‘Bodily harm’ need no explanation and ‘grievous’ means no more and no less than ‘really serious’
R v Waters
Wound
A wound is a ‘breaking of the skin evidenced by the flow of blood. May be internal or external.
R v Rapana and Murray
Disfigure
Disfigure covers not only permanent damage but also temporary damage.
R v Mcarthur
Bodily Harm
‘Bodily Harm’ includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim. It need not be permanent but must be more than transitory and trifling.
Cameron V R
Recklessness
Recklessness is establish if:
(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; and/or
(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and
(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable
R v Tipple
Recklessness
Recklessness requires that the offender know of, or have a conscious appreciation of the relevant risk, and it may be said that it requires “a deliberate decision to run the risk”