Day 4: Robbery Caselaw Flashcards
R v Skivington
Theft is an element of Robbery. Defence to theft (claim of right) is a defence to robbery
R v Lapier
Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession by thief is only momentary
R v Cox
Possession involves 2 elements:
1) Physical. Actual or potential custody or control
2) Mental. Combination of knowledge and intention
R v Maihi
There must be a connection between the act of stealing and the threat of violence. Both must be present. Does not need to be contemporaneously.
Peneha V Police
(Womens wrist and handbag)
It is sufficient that the defendant’s acts interfere with personal freedom
R v Broughton
Threat may be direct or veiled, conveyed by conduct or words. Absence of fear by the victim does not negate the threat
R v Joyce
The crown must establish that at least two persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred.
R v Galey
(look out)
“Being together” in the context of Section 235(b) involves “two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force, directly in the perpetration of the crime.
R v Peat
The immediate return of the goods does not purge the offensive
R v Mitchell
There may be occasions when property is handed over to a thief as a result of threats previously made but still operating on the mind of the victim at the time
R v Bentham
What is possessed must under the definition be a thing. A person’s hand or fingers are not a thing.