Critical Thinking Flashcards
Driving on autopilot is called what
Drone mentality
This requires the combination of rational logic, creativity, commonsense, and intuition
Critical thinking
Intellectual humility, currents, and busy, metonymy, integrity, perseverance, confidence and reason, and fair-mindedness are all what
Essential intellectual traits
for this intellectual trade one does not claim to know more than they actually know
Intellectual humility
This intellectual treat causes you to challenge what you believe to have learned or are influenced to believe is true.
Intellectual courage
Consciousness for need to imaginatively put yourself in another’s place in order to understand them
Intellectual empathy
Having rational control one’s beliefs, value, inferences
Intellectual autonomy
Intellectual treat to which you hold yourself true and consistent in intellectual standards that you apply
Intellectual integrity
Intellectual shrink requires you to have a consciousness of the need to use intellectual insight despite challenges
Intellectual perseverance
Inflectional treat that holds an ability for humans to use reasonable thought in order to persuade others
Confidence in reason
This intellectual trait is having consciousness of the need to treat all viewpoints alike
Fair-mindedness
Should be applied to thinking to ensure quality they must be taught explicitly and infused the students to form part of an inner voice and guide better reasoning
Universal intellectual standards
Which Universal and electrical standard would you see questions like can you elaborate further on that point, could you express that point another way, can you give me an illustration, can you give me an example
Clarity
You can check for this intellectual standard by asking questions such as is that really true, how could you check that, how could you find out if this is true
Accuracy
You can check for this universal intellectual standard by asking questions such as could you give me more details, could you be more specific
Precision
You could check this universal and like she’ll standard by asking questions such as how is that connected to the question, how does that bear on the issue
Relevance
You may address this universal intellectual standards by asking how does your answer address the complexities question, how are you taking into account the problems in the question, are you dealing with the most significant factors
Depth
You may recognize this universal and like she’ll standard by asking do you need to consider another point of view, is there another way to look at this question, what would this look like from a more conservative standpoint, what would this look like for more liberal standpoint
Breadth
When the combination of thoughts are mutually supporting it is an example of this universal intellectual standard
Logic
You can check for this universal standard by asking questions like are you considering all the relevant viewpoints in good faith, are you distorting some information to maintain your biased perspective, are you more concerned about your vested interest in the common good
Fairness
Basic human limitations, use of language, faulty logic or perception, and psychological or sociological pitfalls are four categories of what
Hindrances to critical thinking
Confirmation bias and selective thinking, false memories and confabulation, personal biases and prejudices, physical and emotional hindrances, testimonial evidence are all what
Basic human limitations to critical thinking
This basic human limitation causes you to select facts that you already believe to be true, the best way to combat this limitation is to seek out the actual facts rather than beliefs
Confirmation bias and selective thinking
This basic human limitation the critical thinking is a result of your mind construing the facts you think you remember
False memories and confabulation
This basically human limitations critical thinking is probably most common and the best way to combat it is to focus on the facts references and their motives
Personal biases and prejudices
These basic human limitations to the critical thinking the main food stress drugs or exhaustion
Physical and emotional hindrances
This basic human limitation the critical thinking usually is represented by extraordinary claims of extraordinary claims are to be proven true they must be supported by extraordinary evidence
Testimonial evidence
Ad hominem fallacy and populam bandwagon fallacy, emotional appeals, evading the issue or red herring fallacy. False dilemma, either or fallacy and poisoning the well were all examples of what
Psychological and sociological pitfalls to critical thinking
Criticizing the person making our human another argument itself
Ad hominem fallacy
Basing the validity of the claim on the popularity of the claim versus facts
Add populam, bandwagon fallacy
And attempt to evade the real issue by distraction
Evading the issue, red herring
You’re either with us or with them
Fallacy or false dilemma, either/or fallacy
An attempt to refocus off the argument by using prejudicial remarks
Poisoning the well
Ambiguity, shirring expressions, meaningless comparisons, doublespeak jargon, you motive content, false implications are all indicative of what type of hindrance to critical thinking
Use of language
Statements comparing items that are unclear
Meaningless comparisons
Intentional use of words two rouse feelings about a subject to bias others positively or negatively
Emotive content
Superstition, argument from ignorance, false analogies, relevant comparisons, pragmatic fallacy, slippery slope fallacy are all examples of what type of hindrances to critical thinking
Faulty logic or perception
Claiming something is true because it is not been proven false
Argument from ignorance
Failing to compare apples to apples
Irrelevant comparison
Choosing causes more emotionally appealing then factual
Pragmatic fallacy
Claiming that because of one action other actions will occur
Slippery slope fallacy
Qualifications, integrity, reputation, accuracy/bias
items we should be evaluated when selecting a source
Probability and statistics Dangers
People can be easily fooled by numbers you should be educated in the basics of probability and statistics
Who developed and authored the military and defense critical thinking inventory
Dr. Peter Facione
Who develop critical thinking scoring rubric for the US military called the holistic critical thinking scoring rubric
Dr. Peter and Dr. Noreen Facione
Consist of cognitive mental process, results in selecting a course of action, final choice can be an action or an opinion
Decision-making
System to approach to the two system decision-making is
Reflective
Type of thinking that plays off of situational cues and memories
Reactive
Positives of this type of thinking include decisive, time management, reteam decisions, credibility and reliability, balances over thought, increases intuition from gut feelings
Reactive thinking
Megan is involved with this type of thinking include mistakes, important details overlooked, missed improvement opportunities, impaired judgment and reliability, impact others that work around you
Reactive thinking
This type of critical thinking focuses on information, deliberation, try on planning, and consideration
Reflective thinking
The positives of this type of thinking include improve critical thinking and problem-solving skills, forced consideration of logical arguments, deliberate processes, allows time to monitor and process system thinking
Reflective thinking
Negative this type of thinking include taking too long appearing to be reluctant to make decisions, or overthinking simple tasks
Reflective thinking
Critical thinking and decision-making approach that combines reflective and reactive decision-making
Two system approach
Which step of decision analysis include a list of must and wants
Step two decision criteria
