Critical appraisal Flashcards
1
Q
What is critical appraisal
A
- systematically examining research evidence
- assess its validity, results and relevance before using it to inform a decision
- allowing us to make sense of research evidence and begin to close the gaps between research and practice
- quality of study designs is never certain, even if published
2
Q
How does one write a research paper?
A
- Question:
- Recognise the need for new information
- Should be focused - Finding Evidence: If you have the wrong evidence, you’ll get the wrong answer to your question
- Appraisal:
- Evaluate the validity and usefulness of the details (relative to your question) - Acting on evidence:
- what are you going to do with your new knowledge? - Evaluation and reflection:
- You made changes. Did it impact as you wanted it to?
3
Q
What should be considered when doing a systematic review?
A
- Systemiatic - research process
- Logical - deductive/inductive
- Empirical - evidence based
- Reductive - generalisation
- Replicable - methodology should be repeatable
4
Q
How does one approach a critical review?
A
- Find models (be guided by others)
- Problem formulation – which topic is under consideration and what are the constituent issues?
- Literature search
- Evaluation of findings (against your criteria/Q’s)
- Analysis and interpretation of literature
- describe and analyse the existing evidence base (not a description)
- detail what gaps you’ve found
- reveal similarities and differences, consistencies and inconsistencies and controversies
- (try to) explain reasons for these…
5
Q
What are ideal studies for therapeutic methods
A
RCT
efficacy
alternative method
6
Q
What are ideal studies for diagnosis methods
A
cross sectional
efficacy
reliability
7
Q
What are ideal studies for prognosis
A
longitudinal cohort
8
Q
What are ideal studies for causation
A
cohort, case control, case report
9
Q
Checklist for critical analysis
A
Question Design Population Methods Analysis Counfounders Bias Intepretation
SEE NOTES