Crime - Theories on Crime - 4.1 (Functionalism & Strain Theories) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define Deviance

A

Actions going against norms and values of a society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Crime

A

Behaviour breaking law of a society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Social Control

A

How our behaviour is controlled by society to conform to norms & values e.g. government, police, media

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Social Construction

A

Norms & values are created by society e.g. crime shaped by culture/historical period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

General Functionalist view on Crime & Deviance

A

> See society based on value consensus, disrupted by Crime

> But crime inevitable & natural & sometimes good for society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Two Reasons for Inevitability of Crime (Durkheim)

A

> Not all socialised with same values, leading to differences & thus crime

> Anomie common in modernity

> Crime due to diversity and the creation of subcultures with different norms from mainstream society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two Positive Functions of Crime (Durkheim)

A

> Boundary Maintenance
Adaptation and Change

> Adaptation & Change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Boundary Maintenance (Durkheim)

A

> Crimes unites members to reject deviance, reinforces value consensus & collective conscience

> Society’s rejection of deviance is distinctive from law breaking, we understand behaviours are wrong & shouldn’t be repeated

> Boundary maintenance is good versus evil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Example of Boundary Maintenance

A

e. g. public reaction to Manchester attacks

e. g. public reaction to murder of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes by his father and step-mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Adaptation & Change (Durkheim)

A

> All changes begin with deviance, and a need for people to challenge values

> Without deviance there is no change.

> If new ideas are rejected, society stagnates, unable to make the necessary changes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Examples of Adaptation & Change

A

Votes for women - violent and criminal acts by Suffragettes
Rosa Parks - Civil Rights Movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cohen view on Crime

A

Warning signal, something in society is not working properly to policymakers/leaders.

e.g. certain aspect of law needs reform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Erikson view on Crime

A

> Institutions e.g. police actually ensure crime occurs

> e.g. festivals & carnivals rules are relaxed (public drunkeness, drug use) & they turn a blind eye to deviant behaviour.

> So we can let off steam and don’t do darker crimes

> Also eases transition from childhood to adulthood, through sanctioned rule-breaking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Davis view on Prostitution

A

Safety valve for men’s sexual frustration, not threatening monogamous nuclear family as it’s one off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Polsky view on Pornography

A

Safe channel for sexual desires, not threatening monogamous nuclear family as adultery would.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

General Criticisms of Durkheim’s view

A

> Doesn’t say how much crime there should be

> Causes fear & isolation in individuals e.g. rape so not functional and positive for society

> Crime is functional for society but not for the victims

> Crime doesn’t always create social solidarity, it can divide people

17
Q

Why does Merton believe people engage in deviant behaviour?

A

> Unable to achieve socially approved goals by legitimate means.

> Strain between the goals, society encourage us to achieve & what society allows us to achieve (means).

18
Q

Two Factors for Engagement in Deviance (Merton)

A

> Structural; societies unequal opportunity structure

> Cultural: emphasis on success & less emphasis on how to achieve it legitimately.

19
Q

Merton & American Dream as Flawed

A

> Values success, expected to be pursue legitimately

> Belief in meritocracy, but in reality poverty & discrimination block opportunities.

> This leads to stress & pressure to resort to illegitimate means.

> Due to emphasis on success at all costs - anomie

20
Q

Merton’s 5 Responses to Strain

A
> Conformity
> Innovation
> Ritualism
> Retreatism
> Rebellion
21
Q

Conformity - Merton

A

Accept goals & try to achieve them legitimately e.g. middle class people

22
Q

Innovation - Merton

A

Accept goals & but try achieve them illegally e.g. theft, drug dealing - working class

23
Q

Ritualism (Merton)

A

Give up on goals & simply plod on trying to achieve knowing they never will. e.g. people on minimum wage

24
Q

Retreatism (Merton)

A

Rejects goals & legitimate means & drop out of society e.g. alcohol & drug abusers

25
Q

Define Rebellion with an example

A

Replace existing goals & means with new ones with aim of social change e.g. protests, environmentalists

26
Q

How is Merton too deterministic?

A

Takes official crime statistics at face value, the working class experience most strain but don’t all deviate.

27
Q

Outline the General Criticisms of Merton

A

> Assumes that there is value consensus, everyone strives for material success, not all share society’s goals, people have individual motivations - not necessarily the American Dream.
Only focuses on crime for material gain and doesn’t explain crimes of violence, vandalism etc
Explains individual not group deviance.

28
Q

Cohen & Reasons for Occurrence of Deviance

A

> Due to status frustration, mainly from working, due to inability to achieve success goals by legitimate means.

29
Q

Criticisms of Cohen

A

> Assumes working class boys shared middle class values initially, but they may have never shared these in the first place

> Rejection from society doesn’t always led to rebellion e.g. retreatism/ritualism

> Focuses only on youth crime

30
Q

How do Cloward & Ohlin disagree with Merton?

A

> Not all engage in utilitarian crime e.g property crime.

> Not everyone who fails legitimately, succeeds illegitimately.

31
Q

Cloward & Ohlin & Variation of Crime in different areas

A

Different areas give different illegal chances to learn criminal skills & develop criminal careers.

32
Q

Cloward & Ohlin’s 3 Subcultures

A

> Criminal
Conflict
Retreatist

33
Q

Criminal Subcultures

A

Youths get apprenticeship in crime they learn from experienced members how to do crimes & slowly work their way up the criminal career ladder.

34
Q

Conflict Subcultures

A

Areas of high population with loose ties between individuals fighting for territory to gain status from other gangs.

35
Q

Retreatist Subcultures

A

> People who failed in legitimate & illegal opportunity structures ‘’double failures’’
e.g. drug abusers or alcoholics.

36
Q

Criticisms of Cloward & Ohlin

A

> Ignores powers of ruling class, who make laws to criminalise poor & not rich.

> Too deterministic & overexaggerates extent of working class crime & opportunities available to youth.

> Ignore crimes of wealthy

37
Q

South Criticisms of Cloward & Ohlin

A

3 subcultures overlap, drug trade is a mixture of disorganised crime & professional mafia style.

38
Q

Matza Criticisms of Cloward & Ohlin

A

Delinquents aren’t really committed to subcultures, but drift in & out of delinquency, membership’s often short lived.

39
Q

Miller Criticisms of Cloward & Ohlin

A

The Working Class have their own subculture & values separate to mainstream culture not valuing success in the first place so not frustrated by failure.