Crime - Theories of Crime - 4.1 (Interactionism) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

General Interactionist view on Deviance as a Social Construct

A

No act is deviant, but labelling makes it so, so is a social construct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Becker view on Crime as Social Construct

A

> Groups create deviance through rules, applying them to people they see as outsiders.

> People only become deviant when labelled as so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who are Moral Entrepreneurs?

A

> People who decide what’s morally acceptable in society e.g. government & parents.

> Begin a mission to see new laws created then policed in the belief that it will benefit in particular vulnerable groups in society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Becker view on Social Control Agencies as moral entrepreneurs to increase own powers

A

> US Bureau of Narcotics, campaigned for Marijuana Tax Act, to protect young people, but really to expand influence.

> Not harmfulness of behaviour, leading to new law, but efforts of powerful individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Circourel’s Idea of Typifcations

A

> Police have idea of the working class as typical delinquent individuals, so police these areas more, leading to more arrests, confirming stereotype.

> Held view that there youth delinquency, due to lone parent families & poverty, so stigmatise working class & unlikely to give non-custodial sentences to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Marxist Criticisms of Cicourel - Typifications

A

Fails to locate origins of labels in unequal capitalist society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cicourel - Negotiation of Justice (Difference between working class and middle class children)

A

> Middle class: parents are able to negotiate the child out of the justice system, convincing them, it won’t occur again, so likely to see it as a one off & let them go.

> But working class parents are less likely to do the same & actually feel they deserve to be punished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cicourel - Crime Statistics

A

> Crime statistics aren’t valid, so shouldn’t be taken at face value.

> Should look at how they’re socially constructed, don’t tell us about the dark figure of crime.

> Victim surveys & self report studies should be used instead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2 Types of Deviance - Lemert

A

> Primary
Secondary

> Secondary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Primary Deviance - Lemert (1)

A

Not publicly labeled, unnoticed & meaningless ‘’moment of madness’’ - so people don’t self identify as deviant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Secondary Deviance - Lemert (2)

A

Results from societal reaction, caught and labelled as criminal, excluded from normal society. E.g. as thief, junkie, pedo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Master Status occur as Reaction to SD (Lemert) (3)

A

> People see offender only in terms of label, excluded from society & becomes master status

> Begin to act up to label & becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does Deviant Career as Reaction to Master Status (4)

A

> Promotes further hostile reactions from society, hard to make amends e.g. lack of employment.

> Become an outsider & join deviant subcultures for status, confirms deviant identity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define Deviancy Amplification

A

Where a group becomes more deviant, as result of media exaggeration of deviance, in attempts to control them leads to an escalating spiral.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who are Folk Devils?

A

Scapegoat, group media focuses on as outsiders & deviant, blamed for social problems, subject of moral panic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Young - Hippy Marijuana Users

A

> Drugs were minor part of hippies lifestyle, policies persecution of them as junkies.

> So develop deviant subcultures, where drug use became central activity

> Actions of police caused more crime - deviancy amplification.

17
Q

Mods & Rockers as example of Deviancy Amplification

A

> Media exaggeration began moral panic with growing public concern.

> Moral entrepreneurs called for crackdown, so police arrested more youth, leading to more concern.

> Seeing Mod and Rockers as folk devils, marginalised them further, resulting in more deviance.

18
Q

Labelling & Criminal Justice Policy - Triplett

A

> Tendency to see young people as evil & less tolerant of minor deviance, which creates more deviance

> So logical to have fewer rules e.g. decriminalising soft drugs

> Solution is to reduce number with convictions & end shame culture.

19
Q

2 Types of Shaming - Braithwaite

A

> Disintegrative Shaming
Reintegrative Shaming

> Reintegrative Shaming

20
Q

Disintegrative Shaming

A

Where crime & person is shamed & they’re excluded from society

21
Q

Why is Reintegrative Shaming better than Disintegrative

A

Label act but not actor, so opportunity for person to be forgiven, stops labelling & secondary deviance, so no self-fulfilling prophecy.

22
Q

Examples of Reintegrative Shaming

A

> Rehabilitation
Abolition of small sentences

> Restorative Justice

23
Q

Criticisms of Braithwaite

A

Focus on how to rehabilitate offenders, not why they offend in the first place.

24
Q

Downes & Rock (Determinism)

A

Not everyone who’s been labelled will follow a deviant career, free to chose to not deviate more.

25
Q

General Criticisms of Labelling Theory

A

> Why do people commit primary deviance in the first place, some actively chose deviance without labelling.

> Deviant becomes the victim & thus not to blame for behaviour.

26
Q

General Interactionist view on Mental Health & Suicide

A

Rejects reliance on official statistics , to understanding suicide, we need to study meanings of those who do it.

27
Q

Douglas - Meaning of Suicide

A

> Rejects official statistics, as they’re social constructs, don’t give us a full picture, only tells about label applied by coroners & opinions of friends & family.

> Suicide notes, diaries, letters & interviews better for true meanings.

28
Q

Criticisms of Douglas

A

No reason to believe sociologist interpretation, will be truer than coroners.

29
Q

Atkinson - Coroners Commonsense Knowledge

A

> Official statistics based on coroners with taken for granted assumptions, when reaching verdicts on suicide, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy

> Ideas on typical suicide effected verdict e.g. types of death, locations seen as typical of suicides.

30
Q

Criticisms of Atkinson

A

> If all we have are interpretations & not facts about social world.

> His theory itself is a interpretation & there is no good reason to accept it.

31
Q

Interactionist view on Mental Illness & official statistics

A

> See use of official statistics on mental illness as social construct

> Just recording activities of doctors with the power to attach labels e.g. depression.

32
Q

Goffman on Institutionalisation - Effects of being admitted to Total Institutions

A

> Patient undergo mortification of self, where prior identities killed off.

> Replaced with identity of inmate, through degradation rituals e.g. confiscation of personal possessions.