Coaching Flashcards

1
Q

2 phases of research in past 50 years

A

Phase 1: The “what” of coaching
-Mediational Model of Leadership
-Coach Behaviour Assessment System

Phase 2: The “how” coaching
-Coach effectiveness, mastery approach, decision making, autonomy supportive, leadership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

John Wooden

A

Coaching Behavior Recording Form (UCLA basketball coach, Behaviours coded included 14 Behaviours: e.g. instruction, hustle, non-verbal reward, modeling, scold, reinstruction, minimal use of praises and disapprovals).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Coaching Behaviour Assessment System (CBAS)

A

Event-based coding system;
-8 reactive behaviours
(occur in response to an event or an athlete’s behaviour)

-4 spontaneous behaviours
(unprovoked, not related to an event or an athlete’s behaviour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CBAS – 8 Reactive Behaviours

A
  1. Positive reinforcement or reward (R) – positive reaction by coach to desirable player performance
  2. Non-reinforcement (NR) – failure to reinforce a positive behaviour
  3. Mistake-contingent encouragement (EM) – encouragement following a player’s mistake
  4. Mistake-contingent technical instruction (TIM) – telling or showing player how to make a play correctly following a mistake
  5. Punishment (P) – negative response following an undesirable behaviour
  6. Punitive TIM (TIM+P) – situations when TIM and P occur in same communication, or when TIM is given in hostile manner
  7. Ignoring mistakes (IM) – lack of response to a mistake
  8. Keeping control (KC) – responses designed to maintain order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CBAS – 4 Spontaneous Behaviours

A
  1. General technical instruction (TIG)– instruction designed to foster learning of skills or strategies
  2. General encouragement (EG)– encouragement that does not immediately follow a mistake, and is not in response to specific player actions
  3. Organization (O)– administrative organization
  4. General communication (GC)– communication unrelated to the sport activity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Effective practices for coaching youth sport

A

-Reinforce effort as much as or more than results
-Give encouragement in positive ways after a mistake
-Establish clear expectations
-Set a good example, encourage athletes to be supportive of each other, reinforce them
-Give instructions in positive, clear manner
-Foster 2-way communication and respond to individual needs of players

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Coaching Interventions- Mastery Approach to Coaching (MAC)

A

-Smith et al. (2007) developed an intervention - Mastery Approach to Coaching (MAC)
* Workshop duration is 75 minutes and material is lecture-based
* MAC has goal to increase mastery climate
* Emphasizing coaching intervention in positive ways

-MAC research indicates children playing for trained coaches, as opposed to untrained volunteers, regardless of win-loss record had:
* Significant increases in self-esteem
* Decreases in anxiety levels
* More enjoyable sporting experiences
* More likelihood of returning to team following season

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Coach’s mental model: goal to develop athletes (3 components)

A

-Competition
-Training
-Organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 peripheral components influence coach’s mental model

A
  1. Coach’s personal characteristics: Coach’s philosophy, perceptions, beliefs, or personal characteristics.
  2. Athlete’s personal characteristics: Athlete’s stage of learning, personal abilities, and characteristics.
  3. Contextual Factors: Factors that need consideration in the organization, training, and competition components (e.g. facilities, travelling).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Coaching effectiveness definition

A

“The consistent application of integrated professional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal knowledge to improve athletes’ competence, confidence, connection, and character in specific coaching contexts.”

*professional, integrated and intrapersonal knowledge to improve 4 C’s of athletes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Professional knowledge

A

Coaches’ sport specific knowledge and behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Interpersonal knowledge

A
  • 3 + 1 Cs model of coach-athlete relationships
    – Closeness
    – Commitment
    – Complementarity
    – Co-orientation
  • Emotional intelligence
  • Leadership behaviours
    *building positive relationship with team/individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intrapersonal knowledge

A

Reflection-in-action
–Occurs in the midst of an activity (e.g. during a game

Reflection-on-action
–Occurs within action-present, but not in midst of activity (e.g. between games)

Retrospective reflection-on-action
–Occurs outside of action-present (e.g. post-season)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Athlete Outcomes (4 C’s)

A

-Competence (positive view of one’s actions in sport)
-Confidence (internal sense of overall positive self-worth in sport)
-Connection (positive bonds with coaches, parents, and other athletes)
-Character/Caring (respect for rules, integrity, empathy for teammates and opponents)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contexts of coaching effectiveness (phases of athlete development)

A

-According to competitive context (Recreational/Participation)
-According to Athletes’ Development

-Sampling years (children ages 6-12)
-Recreational years (adolescents/adults ages 13+)
-Specializing years (young adolescents ages 13-15)
-Investment years (late adolescents/adults ages 16+)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Coaching effectiveness: developing competence (4)

A

(1) Provide supportive feedback
(2) Minimize the use of punishment
(3) Provide sport specific instruction
(4) Promote autonomy supportive behaviours and interactions

17
Q

Coaching effectiveness: developing confidence

A

(1) Modify activities for youth to experience successes
(2) Stay positive in verbal and non-verbal communication
(3) Attribute successes to effort and ability
(4) Attribute failures to lack of effort or preparation

18
Q

Coaching effectiveness: developing connection

A

(1) Create task-oriented motivational climate
(2) Discuss and assign responsibilities to each player
(3) Reinforce fulfillment of responsibilities
(4) Encourage team unity through teamwork and social events

19
Q

Coaching effectiveness: developing character

A

(1) Create and reinforce positive codes of behaviours on 4 levels:
- i. team rules, ii. game rules, iii. referees and opponents, iv. social situations
(2) Teach and model positive values in sport
(3) Discuss social responsibilities with young athletes
(4) Promote fair play and do not tolerate cheating and inappropriate behaviours; “acceptable” behaviours in sport should be “acceptable” in life

20
Q

Coaching Education: Coaching Association of Canada

A

-Governs coaching education and development
-Created in 1970
-Mission is to provide the foundation of skills, knowledge, and attitudes to ensure coaching leadership for Canadian athletes
-Trains and certifies coaches in 66 sports (5 of which are disability sports)
-First nationally adopted coach education program worldwide

21
Q

4 Levels of Coaching Education

A
  1. Community Sport Stream
    - Participation at introductory sport levels. Sport for fun, skill development, interactions, and life long participation
  2. Competition Stream
    - Skill development for competition. Coaches are instructed in physical, technical, tactical and mental areas
  3. Instruction Stream
    - Skill proficiency in non-competitive situations
  4. Advanced Coaching Diploma
22
Q

Places for coaching education

A

Selected universities offer specialized training in coach education.
* University of Victoria:
– Two-year Master of Education in Coaching Studies
– Offers courses and co-operative work terms
* Université Laval:
– Baccalauréat en Intervention Sportive
– Provides theory and practical experiences

Australia: National Coaching Accreditation Scheme
* Progressive coach education program offering courses at various levels across 70+ sports

United Kingdom: UK Coaching Framework
* Designed to enhance quality coaching
* Designed to help UK become world leader in coaching development

United States
* USA doesn’t have a government-based national coaching organization. Rather, there are several existing programs.
* American Sport Education Program (ASEP) most widely used (particularly in schools)
* Positive Coaching Alliance also influential and provides training workshops
* Society of Health and Physical Educators created National Standards for Sport Coaches

23
Q

Coaching efficacy

A

The extent to which coaches believe they have the capacity to affect the learning and performance of their athletes.
- It involves the “what” and the “how” coaching.

24
Q

Sources of Coaching Efficacy (4)

A

-Coaching experience and preparation
-Prior success
-Perceived skill of athletes
-School/community support

25
Q

Dimensions of Coaching Efficacy (4)

A

-Game strategy
-Motivation
-Technique
-Character building

26
Q

Outcomes of Coaching Efficacy (4)

A

-Coaching behaviour
-Player/team satisfaction
-Player/team performance
-Player/team confidence