choice theories Flashcards
the 3 main choice theories
deterrence (18th century), rational choice (1986), and routine activity (1979)
deterrence theory (classical criminology)
the first school of thought for criminology
Cesare Beccaria
(DT) wrote on crimes and punishments (1764), laws should be simple, clear, fair and equal. Regardless of motive, laws should be equally applied to everyone because it is a personal choice to break it (free will)
Jeremy Bentham
(DT) wrote an introduction to principles of moral legislature (1780), believed punishments should fit the crime and be rendered at low cost to deter crime.
specific vs. general deterrence
specific- harsh punishments convince offenders to not re-offend
general- threats of punishment convince would-be offenders to not offend
free will
we are free to make behavioral choices
according to deterrence theory, what do punishments need to be effective?
celerity (fast/swift), certainty, and severity
critiques of deterrence theory
delinquents may not fear consequences, punishments may produce defiance, and what types of punishment are effective
rational choice theory
developed by Derick Cornish and Ronald Clark in 1986, states that people commit crime because the possible benefits outweigh the possible punishments
rational criminal
an intelligent criminal that is capable of planning and making a calculated decision, non-impulsive (costs vs benefits)
critiques of rational choice theory
teens lack mature thinking, so are they capable of “rational thoughts”? Teens may be under the influence, participating in group crime (not personal choice), or have variations in individual motives
routine activity theory
developed by Marcus Felson and Lawrence Cohen in 1979, explains crime rates across neighborhoods and focuses on predatory crime
according to routine activity theory, crime rates depend on:
a motivated delinquent( teenage boy) with suitable targets/victims (expensive cars) and a lack of capable guardians present (police officers)
situation crime prevention
recognize the characteristics of sites and situations at risk:
- potential offenders are better monitored
- potential targets/victims are better guarded
- means to commit crime are controlled