Chapter9.APGov.Juanita Espinoza Flashcards
Amicus Curiae
Friend of the court; amici may file briefs or even appear to argue their interests orally before the courts
Amicus curiae, briefs are often filed in appellate cases heard by the U.S. Supreme Court and state supreme courts.
Appellate Court
Court that generally reviews only findings of law made by lower courts
Appellate courts are the part of the judicial system that is responsible for hearing and reviewing appeals from legal cases that have already been heard in a trial-level or other lower court.
Appellate Jurisdiction
The power vested in particular courts to review and/or revise the decision of a lower court
Most appellate jurisdiction is legislatively created, and may consist of appeals by leave of the appellate court or by right.
Constitutional (article III) Courts
Federal courts specifically created by the US conception or by congress pursuant to its authority in Article III
Constitutional Court’s main authority is to rule on whether laws that are challenged are in fact unconstitutional.
Dissenting Opinions
A type of judicial opinion issued by a minority of judges on a court who disagree with the outcome of a case, but wishes to express different legal reasoning
Dissenting opinions also analyze legal principles, they can be used by lower courts to better apply principles that are related to but not controlled by the majority’s opinion.
Chisholm v Georgia
A supreme court case that allowed US Citizens to bring aa lawsuit against states in which they did not reside; overturned by the eleventh amendment in 1789
In 1792, Alexander Chisholm attempted to sue the State of Georgia over payments due to him for goods that Robert Farquhar had supplied Georgia during the American Revolutionary War. Georgia, refused to appear, claiming it could not be sued without consent.
Concurring Opinions
A type of judicial opinion issued by a minority of judges on a court who agree with the outcome of a case, but wishes to express different legal reasoning
In a concurring opinion, one of the judges, Thomas Bjorgen, said the information presented in the appeal “tend to create a reasonable doubt as to Jones’s guilt.”.
Elena Kagen
An associate justice of the supreme court, appointed by president Barack Obama in 2009 while she was serving as solicitor general in his administration
Elena Kagan was the fourth woman to serve on the supreme court.
Eleventh Amendment
An amendment adopted in 1789 protecting states from being sued in federal court by a citizen of a different state or country
The Eleventh Amendment was passed by Congress on March 4, 1794, and ratified by the states on February 7.
Federalist No. 78
A federalist papers . essay authored by Alexander Hamilton that covers the role of the federal judiciary, including the power of judicial review
Federalist 78 is the description of the federal judiciary as and for its defense of judicial independence and the constitutional power of “judicial review”.
John Jay
A member of the founding generation who was the first chief justice of the united states. A diplomat and a co-author of the federalist papers
John Jay was an American statesman, Patriot, diplomat, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, and first chief justice in the US.
John Marshall
The longest-serving supreme court chief justice, Marshall served from 1801 to 1835. Marshall’s decision in Marbury v Madison established the principle of the judicial review in the United States
John Marshall became the fourth chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and is responsible for establishing the Supreme Court’s role in federal government.
Judicial Activism
A philosophy of judicial decision making that posits judges should use their power broadly to further justice
An example of Judicial Activism is Roe v. Wade. In this case, the Supreme Court determined that a Texas law criminalizing abortion was unconstitutional.
Judicial Implementaton
How and whether judicial decisions are translated into actual public policies affecting more than the immediate parties to a lawsuit
The main way of limiting the courts power lies with judicial implementation, the process by which a court’s decision is enforced.
Judicial Restraint
A philosophy of judicial decision making that posits courts should allow the decisions of other branches of government to stand, even when they offend a judge’s own principles
Judicial restraint asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional, though what counts as obviously unconstitutional is itself a matter of some debate.