Chapter 9 Pt. 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Spreading activation

A

Semantic networks

  • When a node is activated, activity spreads out along all connected links
  • concepts that receive activation are primed and more easily accessed from memory (distance important)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lexical decision task

A

Participants read stimuli and are asked to say as quickly as possible whether the item is a word or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Coglab:Lexical decision task

A

Independent variable is association between first and second word (if associated, second word RT faster)

Called priming effect

Dependent variable: reaction time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Coglab results

A

Word then non word had fastest reaction time then:

  • nonword then word
  • associated words
  • unassociated words
  • two non words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Myer and Schvaneveldt-lexical decision task

A
  • “yes” if both strings are words, “no” if not
  • some pairs were closely associated
  • reaction time was faster for those pairs (spreading activation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criticism of Collins and Quillians semantic network

A
  1. Can’t explain typicality effect (canary is a bird is quicker to identify than an ostrich is a bird even though they are same distance from bird node)
  2. Cognitive economy (hand example)
  3. Some sentence verification results are problematic for the model (e.g. pig as animal instead of mammal)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The connectionist approach

A
  • creating computer models for representing cognitive processes
  • parallel distributed processing
  • knowledge is represented in the distributed activity of many units
  • weights determine at each connection how strongly an incoming signal will activate the next unit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“Units” in the connectionist approach

A

Input units: activated by stimulation from enviro

Hidden units: receive input from input units

Output units: receive input from hidden units

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How learning occurs in the connectionist approach

A
  • network responds to stimulus (might be random at beginning)
  • provided with correct response (from feedback etc)
  • modifies responding to match correct response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Error signal in connectionist approach

A

-difference between actual activity of each output unit and the correct activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Back propagation (in connectionist approach)

A
  • error signal transmitted back through the circuit
  • indicates how weight should be changed to allow the output signal to match the correct signal
  • process repeats until the error signal is zero
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Graceful degradation (connectionist approach)

A

Disruption of performance occurs gradually as parts of the system are damaged

In semantic network: 1 concept is at one node and if it’s broken it’s gone

In connectionist approach: concept represented at multiple units and if one is damaged, concept may still be there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What type of learning process is the connectionist approach

A

A slow learning process that creates a network capable of handling a wide range of inputs

Learning can be generalized (if for e.g. new concepts share a lot of features with old concepts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Categories in the brain

A

Different areas of the brain may be specialized to process information about different categories

  • double dissociation for categories “living things” and “non living things”
  • category specific memory impairment (patient K.C and E.W could name non living objects but not living)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sensory-functional (S-F) hypothesis

A
  • distinguishing living things depends on perceiving their sensory features
  • artifacts are more likely to be distinguished by their function
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Multiple factor approach

A

Looks at how concepts are divided up within a category rather than identifying specific brain areas of networks for different concepts

17
Q

Crowding

A

When different concepts within a category share many properties (animals all share eyes and legs)

Results in higher similarity

18
Q

Hoffman and Lambon Ralph experiment

A
  • presented items to subjects
  • then asked them how much do you associate this item with a particular ____ (colour, motion or action)

Animals were rated higher for colour and motion

Artifacts rated higher for performed action

19
Q

Semantic category approach

A
  • specific neural circuits in the brain for specific categories
  • Huth et al experiment in which participants listened to stories in a scanner

Results: Similar words have similar locations in the brain

20
Q

The embodied approach

A

-Our knowledge of concepts is based on reactivation of sensory and motor processes that occur when we interact with the object

Mirror neurons: neurons that fire when we do a task or when we observe another doing the same task

21
Q

Semantic somatotopy

A
  • embodied approach
  • correspondence between words related to specific body parts and the location of brain activation
  • Hauk et al experiment:

Movements: e.g. foot movement
Action word: e.g. kick

Lights up similar areas in the brain

22
Q

Hub and Spoke model

A

-proposes that areas of the brain specialized for different functions are linked to the anterior temporal lobe (ATL), which integrates the information from these areas

23
Q

Pobric et al TMS experiment

A

TMS stimulation of the ATL affected subjects speed of naming equally for artifacts and living things

TMS stimulation of the parietal cortex caused an increase in speed of naming only for artifacts

24
Q

TMS

A

Temporarily disrupts the functioning of a particular area of the brain by applying a pulsating magnetic field using a stimulating coil